Bowlby's Monotropic Theory Flashcards
(13 cards)
What is montropy?
The idea that one relationship that the infant has with their primary caregiver is of special significance in emotional development
What is an internal working model?
A mental model of the world, model relates to a persons expectations about relationships
What is the evolutionary theory?
We are biologically predisposed to form an respond to attachment behaviour
- innate drive to survive
- attachment is innate
What is the acronym for Bowlby’s theory?
A = adaptiveness
S = social releasers
C = critical period
M = monotropy
I = internal working model
Explain the adaptive advantage
Babies who form attachments have adaptive advantage, making them more likely to survive, as they are kept safe, warm and given food
Explain social releasers
Have ‘social releasers’ which unlock the innate tendency of adults to care for them
- Physical releasers: baby face features
- Behavioural releasers: crying, cooing
Explain the critical period
Between 3-6 months. If attachment does not form then, babies are damaged for life - socially, emotionally, intellectually, and physically
Explain montropy
Bowlby believed that babies form one special attachment with their mother. It is special and intense
Explain the internal working model
Through monotropic attachment the infant would form an internal working model.
- A special model for relationships
- Childs future relationship will be based on their relationship with the mother
A03 - The continuity hypothesis provides evidence for Bowlby’s theory
- The Minnesota parent-child study by Sroufe et al followed ppts from infancy to late adolescence
- found continuity between early attachments and later emotional and social behaviour
- Individuals who were securely attached in infancy was highest rated for social competence, less isolated, more popular and empathetic
- Therefore, supports Bowlby’s theory as it shows link between early attachment and later attachment
A03 - Temperament hypothesis may provide an alternative explanation to Bowlby’s theory
- Bowlby placed ownership of how attachments are formed solely on the mother
- In contrast, the temperament hypothesis suggests that infant temperament may explain attachment behaviour
- Easy temperament is more likely to lead to strong attachment
- Whereas temperament difficulty was more likely to lead to insecure attachment
- Kagan’s view is that attachment can be explained in terms of the infants behaviour
A03 - Critical period for attachment is between 3-6 months
- According to Bowlby it’s not possible to form attachments beyond the critical 3-6 month period
- Evidence from Rutter et al show that Bowlby’s claim is true to some extent
- shows that attachment is less likely to form after this period but is not impossible
- The development window is one where children are maximally receptive to formation of certain characteristics/behaviours
- nevertheless such developments are ablet to place outside this window
- Psychologists refer to this as ‘sensitive period’
A03 - Support for Bowlby’s monotropic theory
- Multiple attachments model proposes that all attachments are integrated into one simple internal model
- Appears to contradict Bowlby’s theory but they are not different models
- Secondary attachments do contribute to social development but Bowlby’s theory suggests that a healthy development requires one central person ‘higher’ than the others
- Research into infant-father attachment, suggest the role of fathers are important as secondary attachments and social development (Grossmann + Grossmann)
- Prior and Glaser conclude from a review of research that evidence still points to a hierarchal model