BREACH OF DUTY: Explain + Apply Flashcards
(13 cards)
What does this decide?
Whether D’s conduct fell below the standard of a reasonable person
Reasonable person test
If the person acted as a reasonable person should have?
[Blyth v Birmingham]
[Glascow Corporation v Muir)
D’s characteristics may be taken into account?
Nettleship, inexperience doesn’t count
Children, standard of care will be that of a child the same age.
Mullins
Amateurs, judged against other reasonably skilled amateurs
Wells v cooper
Experts, judged against other professional
Bolam v Barnet hospital
Patients must be informed of all risks!
Montgomery v Lanarkshire health
Risk factors, standard lowered or higher end
Bolton v Stone
seriousness of harm
Paris v stepney
Cost + Practicality
Latimer
Potential benifits or social utility
Day v High performance sports
Unknown risks, if the risk of harm was not known, no breach
Row v Minister of health