Brehm Chapter 1 Flashcards
(11 cards)
Dynamic Financial Analysis (DFA)
Why wasn’t it incorporated
- Focused on volatilities in addition to expected values, which adds complexity
- Required working with different silos of the insurance company
- Required a “natural champion” - which most insurers lacked
- Lack of internal and external pressure
ERM was incorporated instead - had internal/external pressure
ERM & Key Components
ERM - the process of identifying critical risks, quantifying their impacts and implementing strategies to maximize enterprise value
1. Identifying critical risks
2. Quantifying their impacts
3. Implementing strategies
4. Maximize enterprize value
Key Components
* Ongoing process, not 1 time exercise
* Consider risks across whole enterprise
* Focus on material risks only
* Risk includes both favorable and unfavorable deviations from expectation
* Risk must be quantifiable (if possible)
* Implement strategy to mitigate significant risks
* Compare risk and return
ERM Risk Categories
Hint: Sofi Bank
Insurance Hazard Risk - risk taken from other parties in return for premium
* underwriting
* catastrophe
* reserve deterioration
Financial (Asset) Risk - risk to insurer’s asset portfolio due to changes in:
* interest rates, forex rates
* equity prices
* credit quality, liquidity
Operational Risk - execution risks of the insurer, things don’t go as planned
* difficult to (ERM) model - can be modeled in bulk using judgement or use other management methods
Strategic Risks - risks from insurer making wrong choices, or even realizing a choice needs to be made
* difficult to model
Sofi Bank
ERM Process
Hint: MAD Management
Diagnosis - perform high level risk assessment
* set a threshold and focus on material risk (serious threats to the firm)
Analytical - need to model the material risks identified
* quantify risk with probabilities of potential outcomes
* aggregate risk, factor in correlation
Management
* avoid, reduce, mitigate the risk
* eliminate or transfer the risk
* keep risk if there is good risk return tradeoff (speculative risk)
Monitoring
* monitor and update plan if needed
Good ERM Models/Modelers
Good ERM Models:
* show risk return tradeoff from different strategies
* reflect importance of the risks to business decisions
* factor in correlation/dependencies among the risks
* bad ones will overstate or understate certain risks
Good ERM Modelers:
* have deep understanding of the risks
* have trusted relationship with senior management
ERM Model
ERM Model > Underwriting Risk
Hint: PCP - using PCPs to help price accurately!
Pricing Risk
* mis-estimating projected losses
* loss (freq/sev) may be understated
Parameter Risk
* incorrect paramaters –> incorrect outputs
Cat Model Uncertainty - need to incorporate
* varying cat models results, and updates
* assumptions and data quality
ERM Model
ERM Model > Underwriting Risk > Parameter Risk
Hint: I need to SEE Parameters
- Estimation Risk - misestimation of model parameters
- Projection Risk - uncertainty in projections due to changes, i.e. freq/sev to future periods, gas prices, weather change, loss development
- Event Risk - significant unpredicted event (insurer didn’t price this in, not in historical data)
- Systematic Risk - risks (i.e. cats) that impact a large number of policies (non-diversifiable)
ERM Model
ERM Model > Reserving Risk / Asset Risk
Reserving Risk:
* risk that reserves will development adversely
* reserve uncertainty impacts amount of capital that needs to be held
Asset Risk:
* variability in asset values (bonds, stocks, real estate, forex)
* modeling scenarios consistent with historical patterns
ERM Model > Dependency/Correlation Risk
What is correlated?
Dependency/Correlation Risk
* UW cycle, insurance loss trend, reserve developments are correlated across LOBs
* Inflation rates, interest rates, equity values are correlated and should be account for in ERM model
* Cats are often correlated acrossed LOBs
Dependency is quantified with correlation coefficient
* insurers focused on modeling tail dependency
* tail dependency modeled using copulas
Approach to Capital Requirements
Why it’s important + Approaches
Capital must be enough to:
* sustain current underwriting and support growth
* provide for adverse reserve changes or decline in assets
* satisfy regulators, rating agencies, shareholders
Holding enough capital so that the probability of default is very low/remote
* strong financial strength that’ll attract new business
* protects policyholders, but also not holding too much so that shareholder can earn sufficient returns
Holding enough capital to maximize insurer’s franchise value
* protects both policy/shareholder
* franchise value includes balance sheet, customer base, agency relationship, reputation
Holding enough capital to continue to service renewals
* these are typically more profitable
Holding enough capital so that the insurer not only survives a major cat, but also thrives in its aftermath
Why is ERM bad at modeling tail events when determining capital need?
ERM models is least reliable in the extremes:
* difficult to model scenarios that would deplete all cpaital
* tail events are poorly understood
* there is little available data to help derive the tail