Business Law 2 Flashcards
(98 cards)
The statute of limitations for an alleged breach of contract
Generally commences on the date of the breach.
Conditions of performance:
- Precedent- must occur BEFORE duty to perform
- Subsequent- must be present or occur AFTER duty to perform (ex. turning in insurance claim after accident)
- Concurrent- common, title for goods passes when payment rendered
Discharge of duty to perform:
- Failure of conditions-precedent did not occur, duty to perform is discharged
- Under UCC- Right of assurance that contract will be met if reasonable grounds to believe merchant will not meet obligation
UCC Performance
- Rights to determine performance- right of inspection prior to payment
- Right of rejection (entire shipment, part of shipment or accept shipment)
- Buyer’s responsibility- must information seller of rejection in a timely manner, not effective until seller informed, provide specific reasons for rejection, buyer must take care to return goods to seller in good condition or store them properly
UCC Performance-Seller’s rights upon rejection
- Right to cure
2. Substituted performance if contract carrier not available or delivery is impractical by no fault of seller
Acceptance/Actual performance occurs when:
- Buyers notifies seller
- Buyer fails to reject goods in reasonable time
- Buyer engages in act inconsistent with seller ownership of goods
When can buyer revoke acceptance?
- Seller did not cure
- Later discovered that goods are nonconforming after assurance from seller that they are
- Nonconformity was initially difficult to detect
Discharge of duty to perform:
- Failure of conditions (condition precedent)
- Agreement or party action (ex. mutual rescission)
- Novation- new party substituted for original party
- Accord and satisfaction (completion of original or different performance that is agreed upon)
- Operation of the law (statute of limitations, bankruptcy, death, illegality, specific subject matter)
- Performance (including substantial performance meaning any deviations were in good faith and for practical purposes)
- Material breach- if one party breaches, other party is released
Commercial impracticability
UCC doctrine whereby contract can be discharged if there is extreme difficulty or cost to perform.
Delivery terms:
- FOB—(free on board)—Place of shipment or destination
- FAS (Free Alongside Vessel)—Place of shipment.
- CIF (Cost, Insurance, Freight)—Title and risk of loss pass from seller to buyer when the seller delivers (possession) identified conforming goods to the carrier, obtains a negotiable bill(s) of lading covering transportation to a named destination, procures an insurance policy, and forwards to buyer all documents
Passage of title
Important for purposes of who OWNS the property (ex. IRS cannot seize if not owned)
Nondelivery
1. If there is no document of title, title passes at the moment the contract is made, If there is a document of title, then title passes to buyer upon buyer’s receipt of the document
Delivery
2. Title passes upon tender to either carrier or buyer’s contract destination
3. Delivery- seller to deliver at the buyer’s destination and there are no other delivery terms, title passes from the seller to the buyer upon tender of conforming goods at buyer’s destination
Passage of risk of loss
Nondelivery:
1. If seller is a merchant, risk of loss does not pass until buyer actually gets possession
2. If seller is a nonmerchant, risk of loss passes upon seller’s tender of the goods to the buyer.
Delivery:
3. Shipment contract- determined by whether FOB shipping point or destination
Effect of Breach on the Passage of Title and Risk of Loss
Seller’s breach- risk of loss does not pass to the buyer until the defects are cured or buyer accepts goods despite their nonconformity
Buyer’s breach- risk shifts immediately to the buyer for a commercially reasonable period after seller learns of the breach, but only to the extent not covered by seller’s insurance
Breach affects risk of loss, but not title. Title passes according to the rules despite the breach.
Jane hired Delta to cut and remove nine trees from Jane’s lot for $1,000. Delta cut all of the trees but only removed about half of the debris. Will Jane be successful if she asks a court to force Delta to finish removing the debris since Jane has already paid Delta the $1,000?
Jane cannot force Delta to remove the debris.
Types of remedies:
- Nominal (small amount)- when no financial loss suffered
- Compensatory-all costs/loss associated with breach
- Incidental damages-ex. lawyer’s fees
- Consequential damages- forseeable loss known by breaching party of non-performance
- Punitive-designed to punish, used in cases of fraud
- Liquidated damages-agreed to in contract and are reasonable in comparison to loss from breach
Remedies in Equity
- Specific performance-Requiring the other party to perform the contract; available when there are rare goods (antiques) or for buyers of land (land is unique)
- Rescission- restored to same positions as before contract
- Reformation-contract rewritten
- Quasi-contract recovery- prevents unjust enrichment
To which of the following transactions does the common law Statute of Frauds not apply?
Contracts that can be performed within one year.
Under the parol evidence rule, oral evidence will be excluded if it relates to
A contemporaneous oral agreement relating to a term in the contract.
One of the criteria for a valid assignment of a sales contract to a third party is that the assignment must
Not materially increase the other party’s risk or duty.
Ferco, Inc., claims to be a creditor beneficiary of a contract between Bell and Allied Industries, Inc. Allied is indebted to Ferco. The contract between Bell and Allied provides that Bell is to purchase certain goods from Allied and pay the purchase price directly to Ferco until Allied’s obligation is satisfied. Without justification, Bell failed to pay Ferco and Ferco sued Bell. Ferco will
Prevail, because Ferco was an intended creditor beneficiary of the contract between Allied and Bell.
Ferco can collect as a creditor beneficiary.
Rogers and Lennon entered into a written computer consulting agreement that required Lennon to provide certain weekly reports to Rogers. The agreement also stated that Lennon would provide the computer equipment necessary to perform the services and that Rogers’ computer would not be used. As the parties were executing the agreement, they orally agreed that Lennon could use Rogers’ computer. After executing the agreement, Rogers and Lennon orally agreed that Lennon would report on a monthly, rather than weekly, basis. The parties now disagree on Lennon’s right to use Rogers’ computer and how often Lennon must report to Rogers. In the event of a lawsuit between the parties, the parol evidence rule will
Not prevent the admission into evidence of testimony regarding Lennon’s right to report on a monthly basis.
This answer is correct because an exception to the parol evidence rule allows evidence of “subsequent agreements” to be admitted into evidence.
Gray Fabricating Co. and Pine Corp. agreed orally that Pine would custom manufacture a processor for Gray at a price of $80,000.
After Pine completed the work at a cost of $60,000, Gray notified Pine that the processor was no longer needed. Pine is holding the processor and has requested payment from Gray. Pine has been unable to resell the processor for any price. Pine incurred storage fees of $1,000.
If Gray refuses to pay Pine and Pine sues Gray, the most Pine will be entitled to recover is
$81,000
Under the Sales Article of the UCC, which of the following rights is (are) available to the buyer when a seller commits an anticipatory breach of contract?
Recover damages
Cancel the contract
Right of replevin
Form of legal action to recover specific goods from the seller which are being withheld from the buyer wrongfully