C- EXAM Flashcards
(44 cards)
How to measure intent?
Outward Manifestations and objective test (the reasonable person)
Outward Manifestations
Words and actions
Secret intent/thoughts are NOT relevant. (Jesting does not count either)
Objective Test
Would a reasonable person in the position of the recipient would understand that the manifestations (acts, behaviors, and other relevant circumstances) of x were an offer/acceptance?
Express Contract
A legally binding agreement that is written and the terms of which are all clearly stated.
Implied-in-Fact Contract
obligations arising from a mutual agreement expressed not through words but implied through non-verbal conduct.
Disclosing an idea with the expectation of compensation for its use. Can arise even if no agreement was reached as to price, curation, or other terms - just requires “mutual assent”.
If offer invites acceptance only by performance, by rendering the requested performance - thus, completing the bargain, and the user has to pay author for it’s use.
- Taco Bell (used the idea so they have to pay for it)
Offer Standard
Whether a reasonable person would believe THE CONDUCT is an offer?
Southworth Test (Objective Test for Offer)
- Context
- Language
- Number of Recipients
- Details
Southworth/ Offer Objective Test Definitions
Context = what offeree would have understood given the circumstances (ex: two conversations over it including one that was a follow up clarifying seller was still selling the land)
Language = what is said - is offertory language used like “i am SELLING”
Number of Recipients = if it is addressed to just you (more people –> less of an offer)
Details = more likely it is an offer if more specific details - enough detail in the letter to conclude that it has all the necessary info FOR it to be an offer
Are ads or “form letters” considered offers?
NO - they are just an invitation to deal (Lonergan)
Unilateral Offer
promise given in exchange for a COMPLETED act
Bilateral Offer
Promise for a promise
Acceptance
Either by:
- performance
- return promise
Where should you look to determine how to accept an offer?
Look to the offer; the offer will dictate the method of acceptance.
three types of acceptance for a bilateral contract?
(a) Exclusive - “shall” - have to accept by their terms
(b) Suggested - “may accept by the following” - either by their terms or by something equivalent
(c) No method stated - any reasonable method under the circumstances, but MUST GIVE NOTICE FOR THIS TYPE
When must you always provide notice of acceptance to the offeror?
Bilateral - No Method Suggested
If stated in exclusive and explicitly requires a notice of acceptance.
Notice is just letting them know now there is a contract. The contract is completed as soon as other person signs it.
*Silence can count as acceptance in no method stated but you must inform them…
Notice is effective upon dispatch…*
When is a signature ever a unilateral offer?
Autograph
Dispute in a contract…
look to the language of the contract… construe the document against the guy who put the language in it, you are responsible for the stuff you put in and responsible for defining it, it is not up to the opposite party to interpret it.
(You should be able to look to when the exact moment it was accepted - when it was impregnated)
Always remember
offeror is the master of his/her offer.
Can you accept an offer you didn’t know about? (Glover)
No
does there need to be notice of acceptance for a unilateral offer?
No!
Notify of your completed act to get your money duh… just have to give notice of completion within a reasonable amount of time
Ambiguous Manifestations
An offeror cannot force offerees to accept via things they normally do everyday.
If a mode of acceptance is something the offeree does everyday, it cannot be a valid means of acceptance.
Can there be acceptance by silence?
Yes
Bilateral Acceptance:
- act can signal acceptance (driving over land is an act that signals acceptance to terms to pay)
- Conduct can signal acceptance
Silence operates as acceptance in 3 cases:
- where an offeree takes the benefit and has reason to know that they were offered it with the expectation of compensation (Taco Bell)
- Where offeror states or gives reason to understand that assent may be manifested by silence or inaction (Beneficial)
- Because of previous dealings. (Ammons)
Parties have to agree that silence will be agreement because…
Silence is ambiguous - B is about when both parties AGREE to use silence. If one doesn’t agree, how could they accept…