CAPD Final Deck Flashcards
(142 cards)
Tell me about Evidence for a
Musician Speech-Perception-in-Noise Advantage in School-Age Children by Benítez-Barrera, C. R., Skoe, E., Huang, J., & Anne Marie Tharpe, A. M. (2022).
Study - Investigates whether musical training improves speech perception in noisy environments for school-age children. Recruited children with and without musical training (formal instruction). Children with musical training demonstrated better performance in speech in noise tasks which suggests an ability to focus on relevant signals. Musical training enhances auditory and cognitive functions likely due to practice with distinguishing pitch, rhythm, & timing.
Conclusion - Musical training enhances speech perception in noisy environments among school-age children. Tells us music education not only fosters artistic skill but also improves auditory & cognitive functions critical for communication.
Recommendations - Incorporating music into the school curriculum could support auditory and cognitive development. Music Intervention could benefit kids with auditory processing or speech perception challenges.
Tell Me about Blast Exposure and Auditory Processing by Gallun, F. J., Haley, E. G., Jorgensen, L. E., & Pratt, S. R. (March/April 2020).
Study - explore blast exposure on auditory processing & differentiate these effects from peripheral hearing loss and other injuries associated with blasts. Blast exposure often leads to damage in the peripheral and central auditory system resulting in problems with speech in noise, localizing, & processing complex auditory info. These people may exhibit normal thresholds but still report auditory difficulties, this is attributed to disruptions in central auditory processing rather than just peripheral damage. Frequently causes TBI which contributes to deficits in attention, memory, & executive function. Auditory impairments vary based on severity and proximity to the blast as well as susceptibility and comorbid conditions.
Conclusion - blast exposure can result in profound and long-lasting impairments in auditory processing. traditional audiometric tests may fail to detect these issues, emphasizing the need for specialized assessments to evaluate auditory processing and cognitive function.
Recommendations - Routine hearing tests should be supplemented with central auditory processing & cognitive evaluations for individuals with a history of blast exposure. Rehab programs should combine auditory training with cognitive therapy to address both sensory and cognitive deficits. Further studies are needed to develop targeted interventions and understand the mechanisms linking blast exposure to auditory processing deficits.
Tell me about Features of cognitive ability and central auditory processing of preschool children with minimal and mild hearing loss by Ji, H., Yu, X., Xiao, Z., Zhu, H., Liu, P., Lin, H., Chen, R., & Honga, Q. (2023)
Study - explores how minimal and mild hearing loss (MMHL) impacts the cognitive and auditory processing abilities of preschool-aged children.
Conclusion - Preschool children with MMHL exhibit subtle yet measurable differences in cognitive performance compared to peers with normal hearing. Areas affected include attention, memory, and executive functions, ability to localize sound, understand speech in noisy environments, and process complex auditory stimuli. While these children may not show significant delays in basic language milestones, their ability to develop advanced language skills may be compromised. Difficulty in distinguishing subtle sound differences (e.g., phonemes) can lead to later reading challenges. Cognitive deficits and auditory processing impairments interact, amplifying the challenges these children face in learning and communication. For example, deficits in working memory can exacerbate difficulties in processing and retaining auditory information. Early diagnosis of MMHL and its associated impacts on cognitive and auditory processing is essential for preventing long-term effects on academic and social outcomes. The study highlights the need for routine hearing screenings and comprehensive assessments of cognitive and auditory abilities in preschool-aged children.
Recommendations - Incorporate auditory training exercises. Provide access to hearing aids or other assistive listening devices, even for minimal and mild hearing loss. Educate parents. Collaborate among audiologists, speech-language pathologists, psychologists, and educators to provide comprehensive support tailored to the needs of these children.
Tell me about An auditory perspective on concussion by Kraus, N., & Krizman, J. (May-June 2018)
Conclusion - The auditory system is highly sensitive to brain function. Concussions, as a form of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), can disrupt auditory processing, even in cases where peripheral hearing appears normal. Individuals with concussions may experience difficulty processing complex sounds, such as speech in noisy environments, due to disruptions in how the brain integrates auditory signals. Temporal precision, or the brain’s ability to process the timing of sounds, is often compromised, affecting speech perception. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), which measure neural activity in response to sound, can reveal subtle deficits in the brain’s ability to process sound timing and frequency. ABRs provide objective data that can be used to detect and monitor brain dysfunction caused by concussions. Concussion-related auditory processing difficulties can manifest as challenges in understanding speech, particularly in noisy or complex listening environments, affecting communication and quality of life. These issues are often overlooked in traditional concussion assessments, which focus on symptoms like memory, balance, and headaches. Auditory processing assessments should be integrated into concussion evaluation protocols to capture the full scope of neural impact. Rehabilitation efforts can include auditory training to help retrain the brain’s processing abilities and improve functional hearing. Studying the auditory effects of concussion can contribute to a better understanding of brain plasticity and recovery. Auditory-based diagnostics, such as portable and non-invasive brainstem testing, offer promising tools for detecting and managing concussion-related neural dysfunction.
Recommendations - Include auditory processing tests, such as ABRs, as part of standard concussion evaluation protocols to identify subtle neural impairments. Develop auditory-based rehabilitation strategies, such as sound-based therapy and listening exercises, to address deficits in sound processing. Educate clinicians and audiologists on the auditory impacts of concussions to ensure comprehensive care and early detection of auditory deficits.Use auditory biomarkers to track recovery over time, providing objective measures of brain health and guiding treatment decisions.
Tell me about Benefits for children with language- and reading-related learning difficulties by Loo, J. H. Y., Bamiou, D., Campbell, N., & Luxon, L. M. (2010)
Study - Investigate how auditory processing interventions or accommodations might benefit children with language and reading difficulties particularly those linked to auditory processing disorders.
Conclusion - Children with APDs often face difficulty distinguishing and processing sounds, which can contribute to problems in phonological awareness, a crucial skill for reading and language development. Auditory training programs and assistive listening devices improved auditory discrimination and processing in children, leading to better language and reading outcomes. Combining auditory interventions with other sensory-based learning strategies (e.g., visual or kinesthetic aids) enhanced the overall effectiveness of interventions. Identifying APDs early and implementing targeted interventions were critical for improving academic and social outcomes for children.
Recommendations - Tailored interventions that address the specific auditory deficits in children with learning difficulties. Collaboration between audiologists, educators, and speech-language therapists is essential to provide comprehensive support.
Tell me about Individual differences in language
and working memory affect children’s speech recognition in noise by McCreery, R. W., Spratford, M., Kirby, B., & Brennan, M. (2017)
Conclusion - Children’s ability to recognize speech in noisy settings varies widely and is influenced not only by auditory factors but also by cognitive and linguistic abilities. Speech-in-noise recognition is a critical skill, particularly in educational and social settings. Stronger language abilities (vocabulary, syntax, and phonological awareness) help children better predict and decode speech in challenging auditory conditions. Children with weaker language skills may struggle more in noisy environments, as they have less linguistic context to rely on. Working memory plays a vital role in processing and retaining auditory information while filtering out background noise. Children with better working memory capacities can more effectively manage the cognitive demands of noisy environments. The study highlights the interaction between auditory processing, language, and working memory in determining children’s speech recognition performance in noise.
Recommendations - Assessing and addressing individual differences in these areas are crucial for supporting children, particularly those with hearing loss or auditory processing difficulties. Make sure you are providing holistic assessments, using targeted intervention, and technical support such as FM systems, and use a collaborative approach.
Tell me about Assisting Veterans with mTBI/PTSD by Mehta, Z., Thorstad, T., & Hale, T. (2019, June)
Conclusion - Many veterans experience both mTBI and PTSD due to their service-related experiences. These conditions often co-occur, making it challenging to distinguish between their symptoms.
Symptoms of mTBI, such as headaches, memory problems, and difficulty concentrating, often overlap with PTSD symptoms like hypervigilance, anxiety, and emotional dysregulation. Accurate diagnosis can be difficult because of the overlapping symptoms and the subjective nature of many complaints. Comprehensive assessments are recommended, including neuropsychological testing, interviews, and self-report questionnaires to identify the primary sources of impairment. Veterans with mTBI/PTSD often experience difficulties in cognitive functioning (e.g., attention, memory), emotional regulation, and interpersonal relationships. These challenges can affect their reintegration into civilian life, including employment and social relationships. Interdisciplinary Care: The article emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, audiologists, and occupational therapists. Cognitive Rehabilitation: For mTBI, cognitive training and strategies to compensate for memory and attention deficits are highlighted. Trauma-Focused Therapy: Evidence-based therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) are effective for PTSD. Symptom Management: Addressing secondary symptoms such as sleep disturbances, headaches, and chronic pain is also crucial. Social support and family involvement play critical roles in recovery. Education for family members about mTBI and PTSD can improve understanding and communication. The authors discuss the availability of resources through organizations such as the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which provides specialized programs for veterans with these conditions. Assistive technologies, vocational rehabilitation, and peer support groups are highlighted as valuable tools for reintegration.
Recommendations - Treatment should be individualized based on the veteran’s specific needs, with flexibility to address the evolving nature of their symptoms. Early intervention and ongoing care are essential for better outcomes. Increasing awareness among healthcare providers about the unique needs of veterans with mTBI/PTSD is critical for improving care.
Tell me about Auditory processing performance of the middle-aged and elderly: Auditory or cognitive decline? by Murphy, C. F. B., Rabelo, C. M., Silagi, M. L., Mansur, L. L., Bamiou, D. E., & Schochat, E. (2018)
Study - Explored if declines in auditory processing in older adults are primarily due to age-related changes or if it is influenced by cognitive decline. Determined auditory processing difficulties are not solely due to peripheral hearing loss but also involve cognitive decline. The Elderly showed poorer performance on auditory processing tasks compared to the middle-aged - particularly speech in noise & temporal processing. Cognitive factors contribute to auditory processing performance, particularly for tasks requiring complex integration.
Conclusion - Auditory processing problems are not solely due to peripheral hearing loss but also cognitive decline. When assessing auditory processing issues in older adults consider auditory & cognitive factors.
Recommendations - Audiological evaluations should include cognitive assessments for older adults. Interventions may benefit from targeting auditory training and cognitive strategies to improve auditory processing abilities.
Tell me about On the clinical entity in audiology: (Central) Auditory processing and
speech recognition in noise disorders by Vermiglio, A. J. (2014)
Study - examines the concept of auditory processing disorders (APDs), particularly focusing on speech recognition in noisy environments, and questions whether APD can be considered a distinct clinical entity in audiology.
Conclusion - Vermiglio discusses the criteria for a “clinical entity” in medical and audiological practice, which include a clear and distinct pathology, associated symptoms, and effective diagnostic and treatment protocols. He questions whether CAPD meets these criteria, particularly concerning speech recognition in noise (SRN).SRN difficulties are often attributed to CAPD, but the author argues that SRN challenges might instead reflect broader cognitive, linguistic, or hearing issues rather than a distinct auditory processing deficit. Variability in SRN performance may be influenced by factors such as language skills, working memory, and attention, rather than solely central auditory processing.The article highlights the lack of standardization and consistency in diagnosing CAPD, leading to potential misclassification of individuals. Tests used for diagnosing CAPD often overlap with those measuring cognitive and linguistic abilities, raising questions about their specificity to auditory processing.Vermiglio emphasizes that SRN difficulties are likely multifactorial, involving peripheral hearing, cognitive processes, and language abilities. The author advocates for a more holistic approach to understanding SRN challenges, rather than attributing them solely to CAPD. The article calls for a re-evaluation of the concept of CAPD as a distinct clinical entity and suggests focusing on functional outcomes, such as improving communication in noisy environments, regardless of the underlying cause. Vermiglio recommends a broader, multidisciplinary perspective that considers the interaction of auditory, cognitive, and linguistic factors in assessment and intervention
Recommendations - Use comprehensive evaluations that account for cognitive and linguistic contributions to SRN performance. Shift from diagnosing CAPD as a standalone entity to addressing practical communication challenges in noise. Incorporate expertise from audiologists, speech-language pathologists, and cognitive scientists to create effective intervention strategies.
Tell me about Using different criteria to diagnose (central) auditory processing disorders: How big a difference does it make? by Wilson, W. J., & Arnott, W. (2013)
Study - examines how the application of varying diagnostic criteria affects the identification and diagnosis of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders (CAPD). The study highlights the lack of standardization in CAPD diagnostic practices and its implications for clinical and research contexts.
Conclusion - CAPD diagnosis lacks a universally accepted standard, with different clinicians and researchers applying varying criteria to interpret test results. The authors explore how changes in diagnostic criteria, such as the number of failed tests or the severity of the deficits required, impact diagnosis rates. The study involved a retrospective analysis of test data from individuals assessed for CAPD. The researchers applied different diagnostic criteria to the same dataset to determine how diagnosis rates varied. Diagnosis rates fluctuated significantly based on the criteria used. For example: Stringent criteria requiring failure on multiple tests yielded lower diagnosis rates. Lenient criteria allowing failure on fewer tests or emphasizing certain domains (e.g., auditory discrimination) resulted in higher diagnosis rates. These discrepancies highlight the subjectivity in current CAPD diagnostic practices. Variability in diagnosis can lead to inconsistencies in treatment recommendations, with some children receiving interventions unnecessarily while others may be overlooked. The study underscores the need for standardized diagnostic protocols to ensure accurate and equitable identification of CAPD. Many tests for CAPD overlap with assessments for other conditions, such as language impairments or cognitive deficits, complicating differential diagnosis. The reliance on behavioral tests, which depend on patient cooperation and attention, introduces variability in results.
Recommendations - Develop and adopt consistent diagnostic guidelines to reduce variability and improve the reliability of CAPD diagnoses. Incorporate input from audiologists, speech-language pathologists, and psychologists to distinguish CAPD from related conditions. Focus on functional impairments, such as difficulties in real-world listening environments, rather than strictly test-based criteria. Promote research to establish the validity and reliability of various diagnostic tests and criteria.
What is CAPD?
complex, heterogenous, bottom up perceptual disorder. it affects the auditory system leading to a sensory processing problem that impacts listening, spoken lanauge, comphrension, and learning
4 subtypes of (C)APD
lexical decoding, tolerance fading memory (TFM), organizational deficits and integration deficits
lexical decoding deficits
difficulty processing words verbal and written resulting in porr reading and spelling. the left posterior temporal lobe is involved
tolerance fading memory
difficulty listening in noise and recalling information resulting in weak expresssive language and poor handwriting. The frontal and anterior temporal lobe with a small region of the parietal lobe are involved.
organizational deficit
poor auditory sequencing or planning resulting in problems with sequential information. The pre and post central gyri with anterior temporal lobe are involved.
integration deficit
problems integrating acoustic and linguistic information. the corpus callosum is involved.
What is developmental APD?
cases presenting in childhood with normal hearing and no other known etiology or potential risk factors
What is acquired APD?
cases associated with a know post natal event that could plausibly explain the APD
What is secondary APD?
cases where APD occurs in the presence or as a result of peripheral hearing impairment
Someone with dichotic processing problems would present with? Which tests assess dichotic processes?
present : speech in noise issues, difficulty in complex environments, difficulty with rapid speech and difficulty following directions
tests : dichotic digits, competing sentences, SSI CCM, & SSW
Someone with temporal processing problems would present with? Which tests assess temporal processes?
present : difficulty with timing cues, difficulty understanding fast speech, difficulty following rhythms and patterns
-leading to difficulty reading and writing
tests : GIN, RGDT, DPT, PPST
Someone with binaural interaction problems would present with? Which tests assess binaural interaction?
present : difficulty localizing, difficulty in noise and spatial awareness issues
tests : MLD & auditory fusion
Someone with auditory closure problems would present with?
Which tests assess monaural low redundancy speech/auditory closure processes?
present : difficulty with muffled speech or accented speech, reverberant issues, difficulty with phone conversations and may report missing information
-impacts phonemic processing and suprasegmental cues therefore impacting language learning
tests : filtered words, time compressed sentences, SSI ICM, speech in noise
What tests assess the brainstem?
PSI, SSI ICM, MLD (lower brainstem),