Caregiver-infant interactions, role of father and schaffer's stages Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

what is meant by attachment?

A

an emotional bond between two people, it is a two-way process (reciprocal) that lasts a long time

attachment leads to certain behaviours such as proximity-seeking and it helps the infant survive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the two purposes of attachment?

A
  1. survival- to protect from danger, keep safe
  2. provides an internal working model about relationships which leads to expectations about future relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are 3 attachment behaviours?

A
  1. proximity- people try stay physically close to those they are attached to
  2. separation anxiety- people are distressed when an attachment figure leaves their presence
  3. secure base behaviour- infants regularly return to attachment figure when playing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what do babies emit which helps form attachments?

A

social releasers e.g. looking cute, cooing, having big eyes, laughing, smiling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is meant by interactional synchrony as a caregiver-infant interaction?

A

mother and infant reflect both the actions and emotions or the other (mirror), they do this in a coordinated (synchronised) way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is meant by reciprocity as a caregiver-infant interaction?

A

interaction is 2 way
both infant and mother respond to each other’s signals and each elicits a response from the other

it is described as a ‘dance’ between mother and baby, sometimes called ‘turn-taking’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what did Meltoff and Moore investigate?

A

interactional synchrony between mothers and 2 week old infants

adult displayed 3 different facial expressions and 3 different gestures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what did Meltoff and Moore find?

A

the response of the child to the expressions/gestures was rated and they found an association between the action of the child and expression/gesture of adult

this was rated by researchers independently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what could a limitation of Meltoff and Moore’s study be?

A

we don’t know the purpose of the interactions or how important they are for forming attachments- which is why we look at Isabella et al study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did Isabella et al study?

A

observed 30 mothers and babies together and assessed degree of synchrony

also assessed the quality of mother-infant attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what did Isabella et al find and what does this suggest?

A

high levels of synchrony are associated with high quality attachments

which suggests that these interactions are important for development of quality attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what experiment did Tronick carry out?

A

still face experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe Tronick’s still face experiment?

A

parent and child are interacting and responding to each other, then parent stops responding and goes ‘still face’

the child then becomes distressed and tries to get the parent to respond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how does Tronick’s findings support the importance of caregiver-infant interactions?

A

the interactions must be important in forming attachments and therefore the child’s emotional development because the child becomes so distressed when the interactions aren’t there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a general strength of research into caregiver-infant interactions?

A

generally controlled observations that capture fine details e.g. Meltoff and Moore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a main limitation of research into caregiver-infant interactions?

A

observations don’t tell us the meaning behind the interactions e.g. are they important for attachment/development? are infants actions conscious or deliberate?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are the 4 stages of Schaffer’s stages of attachment?

A
  1. asocial stage (first 2 weeks)
  2. indiscriminate attachment stage (2-7 months)
  3. specific attachment stage (around 7 months)
  4. multiple attachment stage (7 months onwards)
18
Q

what happens in the asocial stage of attachment?

A

babies are interested in discovering the world around them

have similar response to objects and humans

accept comfort from any adult

19
Q

what happens in the indiscriminate stage of attachment?

A

show preference for people over objects

recognise and prefer familiar adults

usually accept comfort from any adult

20
Q

what happens during the specific attachment stage?

A

start to show anxiety towards strangers and separation anxiety from one particular adult (mother in 65% of cases) called the PRIMARY ATTACHMENT FIGURE

21
Q

who is usually the primary attachment figure and why?

A

65% mother

it isn’t the person the baby spends the most time with, but the person who best responds to their emotional needs

22
Q

what happens during the multiple attachments stage?

A

children become attached to other people who they have regular contact with- called SECONDARY ATTACHMENTS

these aren’t as important to the child as primary attachments

23
Q

who is a key researcher who can be used to support stages of attachment? what did they do?

A

Schaffer and Emerson’s Glasgow baby study

observed the development of 60 infants in their own homes in Glasgow

24
Q

what were the findings or Schaffer and Emerson’s Glasgow baby study?

A

65% attached to mother only
30% mother and another (usually father)
3% father only

they found responsiveness to emotional needs, play and social interaction mattered most in attachment formation

the primary attachment wasn’t necessarily the person who fed, changed, washed or spent most time with child

25
how can Schaffer and Emerson's Glasgow baby study be used to support stages of attachment?
supports stage 3 as most children had a primary attachment at 6 months (specific attachment)
26
BUT not all children had one primary attachment, some went straight to multiple attachments, what problems does this raise about Schaffer's stages?
does primary attachment formed during stage 3 necessarily come before secondary attachments at stage 4, or can some children go straight to having multiple attachments
27
what is a limitation of research into Schaffer's stages of development?
difficult to measure the asocial stage- babies under 2 weeks have poor co-ordination and are often pretty much immobile so there isn't much observable behaviour so we can't rely on evidence during this stage
28
what are some strengths of research into Schaffer's stages of development? counter these?
high external validity as the observation was naturalistic (carried out in children's own homes) HOWEVER findings might not be that generalisable since the study was using a small sample of 60 babies and all were brought up in the same city 50 years ago, might lack temporal validity longitudinal study meant higher validity- same children were followed and studied regularly.... so we can be sure findings aren't a one off, also less participant variables
29
what is the problem with measuring multiple attachments for Schaffer's stages?
just because a baby gets distressed when an individual leaves the room does not necessarily mean the individual is a 'true' attachment figure Bowlby pointed out children have playmates as well as attachment figures and may become distressed when these leave but that doesn't actually mean they're attached Schaffer and Emerson's study cannot distinguish between observations when a secondary attachment figure leaves the room and when a 'playmate' leaves
30
in basic terms, what is the role of the father?
research shows fathers have an important role in play and stimulation and less so in nurturing (meeting emotional needs) when father's take on the caregiving role, they adopt behaviour more typical of mothers
31
how can evidence from Schaffer and Emerson's study be used to support role of the father?
found majority of infants attached to mother first around 7 months but shortly after, they would form secondary attachments to other family members including the father. 75% of the children had formed attachments to father by 18 months
32
what does Shaffer and Emerson's study tell us about importance of father's in attachment?
1. perhaps father's role is less important than mothers 2. children do form attachments with the father so the father is important in child development
33
what did Field do that supports the role of the father? what did they found?
filmed 4 month old babies in face to face interactions with mother and father found that if father was the primary caregiver, they spend just as much time smiling, imitating and holding the infants as the mother does
34
what does Field's study tell us about the importance of the father in attachment?
1. if the father takes on primary caregiver role, they are just as capable of meeting the child's emotional needs as mother. 2. it isn't about gender, it is about how responsive the parent is to the child's needs
35
what did Grossman do that supports role of the father?
found that the quality of a fathers play with infants was correlated to the quality of child's attachment in adolescence.
36
what does Grossman's research tell us about the importance of the father in attachment?
father plays important role but not through meeting emotional needs, play and social interaction instead could help explain why fathers are often the secondary attachment figure also still shows importance of father for quality attachment in later life
37
what did MacCallum and Golombok find?
children growing up in single or same-sex parent families do not develop differently from those in two-parent heterosexual families tells us attachment is less to do with gender and more to do with quality of interactions and responding to child's emotional needs
38
why don't father's generally become the primary attachment?
societal expectations of the father going to work and the mother caring for child- it is less down to ability.
39
why is it difficult to draw conclusions from research into the role of the father?
research focuses on different things so hard to make comparisons
40
why is research into the role of the father and caregiver interactions socially sensitive?
it suggests fathers aren't usually the primary caregiver so that might imply mothers have a role of staying at home to look after the children so reinforces societal expectations and restricts women in careers.