Cars & Containers Flashcards

1
Q

Chambers v. Maroney

A

warrantless search of vehicle not incident to arrest. Car at police station. OK if officer had PC at seizure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Carrol v. U.S.

A

Holds a search warrant unnecessary where there is PC to search an automobile stopped on the highway. The car is movable, the occupants are alerted, and the cars contents may never be found again if a warrant must be obtained.

  • fleeting opportunity to search bc car is moveable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Coolidge v. N.H.

A

search of car in driveway 2 hours after taken into custody is unconstitutional. Not fleeting. No valid s/w.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

California v. Carney

A

“motor home” warrantless search.

policy: (1) ready mobility (2) less expectation of privacy in vehicle

Vehicle falls within scope of automobile exception laid out in Carroll.

  • licensed motor vehicle, subject to regulation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Inventory search

A

“automobile inventory” warrant exception.
- ok under the Fourth Amendment
- Not related to criminal investifation.
- Protects defendants stuff, protects claims against police, protection of potential danger to police.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fl v. Wells

A

Highway officer not permitted to open locked luggage because not part of department policy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Chadwick

A

double locked 200 pound footlocker in trunk. Taken to fed building. Not automobile exception. Need warrant because evidence is not at risk of being destroyed.

Law enforcement officers may seize a container and hold it until SW is obtained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Arkansas v. Sanders

A

personal luggage, loaded in taxi full of marijuana. Not an automobile search exception, expectation of privacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Containers by nature that may be opened without a search warrant?

A

gun case, kit of burglar tools (contents can be inferred from outward appearance).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Robbins v. CA

A

smell marijuana = PC
2 packages opened, warrantless search impermissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

U.S. v. Ross

A

Overrules Robbins. “A warrant to search a vehicle would support a search of every part of their vehicle” –including containers therein–that might contain the object of the search.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

CA v. Acevedo

A

marijuana in fed ex package, paper bag in house then back out.

The police may search without warrant if police officer has probable cause (in a car)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Are searches per se unreasonable?

A

Yes, unless an exception applies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly