Case and Costs Management Flashcards
(40 cards)
CPR 1.4
court has duty to further the overriding objective by actively managing cases
- hands-on approach to deal with cases
Timeline (allocation and CCMC)
- defence
- notice of proposed allocation
… at least 28 days later
- Both parties file and serve (1) directions questionnaire D181, (2) proposed directions
- allocation and notice of allocation sent o both parties
- directions OR require CMC
Precedent H (deadlines and main details)
costs budget 3.13(1)b
filed with directions questionnaire if value of claim is less than £50,000
if value of claim between £50,000 and £10mn - filed not later than 21 days before CCMC
disclosure report (deadline and main detial)
Form N263 (CPR 31.5(3)-(8)
not less than 14 days before CCMC
Precedent R (deadline and main detail)
3.13(2)
no later than 7 days before CCMC
notice of proposed allocation (26.3)
tells parties what track provisionally allocated
- specify matters parties which parties must comply with by date specified in notice
- requires parties to file DQ and serve copies, proposed directions, costs budget, budget discussion report
Directions Questionnarire
enables court to determine whcih track case should be allocated to
- compliance with pre-action protocol
- settlemnet considered?
- extent of disclosure?
- witness/experts
- estimated time for trial
- which court
- which track
- stay?
parties attempt to agree directions if case has been provisionally allocated to FT
PRECEDENT H (costs budget)
a prescribed form for costs budget - it is an estimate of reasonable and proportionate costs which party intends to incur in proceedings
- contains statement of truth
filed with DQ if value less than £50,000 (3.13(1)a)
filed not later than 21 days before 1st CMC in any other case (3.13(1)b)
PRECEDENT R (budget discussion report)
parties discuss budgets with each other
- shows what figures agreed to for each phase of litigation
- brief summary for grounds of dispute (3D PD)
costs management (CPR)
- 1
3. 1(2)m - sweep up
cases exempt from costs management
3.12
more than £10mn
made on behalf of person under 18
sanctions for non compliance
3.4 - strike out
otherwise:
- case management
- money
IN TIME APPLICATION (deadline not passed)
3.1(2)a
court considers:
- reasons for requiring extension
- if delay in making application, why
- overriding objective
- hearing date affected?
not all or nothing - court can offer 7 e.g. if person applied for 14
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (out of time application)
3.9, Denton
- identify and assess the SERIOUSNESS and SIGNIFICANCE of the failure to comply with relevant rule/PD/court order
(if hearing date affected -it is serious)
- hearing dates affected?
- disrupt conduct of proceedings?
- if yes = serious and significant
- how late? if other party can still comply with rules = ok - Consider WHY the default occured
- debilitating illness = good
- forget/pressure at work = not good - Evaluate ALL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE to ensure court deals with matter justly, with particular weight to CPR 3.9(a), (b)
- so consider pass failures, promptness of application, how well innocent party has complied in the past
pre action protocols + PD on pre-action conduct
sets out best practice + reasonable procedure to be followed
CPR requires parties to comply with these before issuing court proceedings
issue and serve CF
serve within 4m of issue (7.5(1))
summarises C’s case - issued by court at request of C
serve POC
(1) at same time as CF
(2) within 14 days of service of CF (7.4(1)b)
must be accompanied by notes for R and response pack
file acknowledgement of service
within 14 clear days of deemed service of POC
- optional
- gives D more time to draft defence
- OR used if D wants to dispute jurisdiction
file and serve defence
within 14 days of service of POC (or 28 days if AOS was filed) - CPR 15.4(1)b)
comprehensive response to POC D must state which allegations it: (1) admits (2) denies (3) require proof (unable to admit or deny)
allocation
track determines recoverability of costs and level of judge who hears case
court officer provisionally decides track and then serves on each party a notice of proposed allocation
after DQ - official allocation
if parties disagree - allocation hearing
small claims track
part 27
claims with value of less than £10,000
fast track
part 28
claims with value of up to £25,000
AND
- trial lasts no longer than 1 day
- there will only be 1 expert per party in a max of 2 expert fields
multi track
part 29
all other cases
i.e. worth more than £25,000 and FT requirements not met
CCMC (MT only)
hearing attended by both sides’ solicitor
PURPOSE
- discuss proposed directions
- judge provides directions order
- ensure real issues between parties are identified and understood
- approve costs budget, make CMO
COURT CONSIDERS
- settlement?
- steps taken?
- previous order/directions
- costs proportionate?