Case Control Studies Flashcards

1
Q

What are the fundamentals of case control studies? [4]

A

Identify individuals with a disease (cases)

Identify `similar’ individuals without the disease (controls)

Determine previous exposure

Relate information on exposure to disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where do you source cases [3] and controls [3]

A

Cases:
* Want representative of all people with the disease of interest
* Could be incident cases from disease registry
* Could be hospital based recruitment but this may give a biased sample

Controls:
* same population as cases
* If hospital based ensure the reason for being in hospital not also related to exposure of interest
* Usually more than one control per case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is undermatching? [1]
Give an example [1]

What is overmatching? [1]
Give an example [1]

A

Undermatching: Cases and controls aren’t similar enough
* don’t match on age cases may be older and therefore more likely to smoke than controls.

Overmatching: Cases and controls may be too similar
* Eg if choose siblings may not differ in exposure of interest, for example parental smoking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name 4 causes of bias in case control studies

A

Recall bias
* Cases may remember more than controls

Reverse causality
* Has disease caused changes in recent exposures

Selection of cases
* Are they representative of all people with the disease

Selection of controls
* Are they representative of all people without the disease
* Are they similar to the cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe structure of a nested case control study [2]

A

“Prepared” the case control studies: collected e.g. blood samples from a large population.

These are frozen and then waited to see who gets the disease

.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nested case-control studies are good for assessing what? [1]

A

Useful for biomarkers studies where biomarker is expensive to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

I want to investigate a risk factor for a rare disease. Which should you use?
Why?

Cohort
Case control

A

Case control

If a disease is extremely rare a cohort study may have to be impractically large to get enough people with the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

I want to investigate if a rare exposure is associated with a disease ? Which should I use and why?

Cohort
Case control

A

Cohort

If an exposure is rare there may be too few people exposed in a case-control study to be able to draw conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why cant you calculate relative risk of of a case control study?

A

Do not know risk of the disease (as you have started with cases with the disease)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Whata can you assess instead of relative risk in a case control study?

A

Use Odds Ratios = odds exposure in case / odds exposure in controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State 4 causes of bias in case control studies [4]

A
  1. Recall bias: cases may remember more than controls. If you have a disease and are being asked about previous exposures, you will have more thought into this than the controls will.
  2. Reverse causality: has disease caused changes in recent exposures?
  3. Selection of cases: are they representative of all people with the disease?
  4. Selection of controls: are they representative of all people without the disease and are they similar to the cases?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How effective is odds ratio for an estimate of relative risk if a disease is rare? [1]

A

If the disease is RARE the odds ratio is a good estimate of the relative risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Interpret this odds ratio [1]

A

Babies who died were twice as likely to have been put on their sides rather than their backs compared to babies who did not die

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can you assess for confounding variables in controsl that weren’t matched for? [1]

A

logistic regression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can you assess for confounding variables in controsl that weren’t matched for? [1]

A

logistic regression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

absoulte risk in case control

A
17
Q

How do you calculate attributable proportion in a case control study?

A
18
Q

Calculate the attributable proportion for this data?

A
19
Q

Does exposure to blue asbestos cause lung cancer - What study should you do?

Case-control
Cohort
Clinical trial
Cross-sectional survey

A

Does exposure to blue asbestos cause lung cancer - What study should you do?

Case-control
Cohort: Rare exposure
Clinical trial
Cross-sectional survey

20
Q

Is prevalence of back pain more common in men or women ?

Case-control
Cohort
Clinical trial
Cross-sectional survey

A

Is prevalence of back pain more common in men or women ?

Case-control
Cohort
Clinical trial
Cross-sectional survey

21
Q

Place the following in order of most to least likely to have bias

Case-control
Cohort
Clinical trial
Cross-sectional survey

A
22
Q

Place the following in order of most to least likely to have a risk of confounding factors

Case-control
Cohort
Clinical trial
Cross-sectional survey

A
23
Q

Place the following in order the strength of proof in causility in the following?

Case-control
Cohort
Clinical trial
Cross-sectional survey

A
24
Q

Name 5 reasons, apart from causility that may have associations between an exposure and a disease [5]

A

Bias
Reverse causality
Confounding
Incorrect analysis
Chance

25
Q

What criteria needs to be met to assess if an association is causal? [1]

A

Bradford Hill Criteria for Causation

26
Q

Name and explain the 9 criteria of Bradford Hill Criteria of Causility [9]

A

Temporal relationship: Exposure always precedes the outcome

Strengh: size of the the association as mesured by appropriate stastistical tests

Dose-response Relationship: an increasing amount of exposure increases the risk

Consistency: The association is consistent when results are replicated in studies in different settings using different methods

Plausibility” the association agrees with currently accepted understanding of pathological processes

Consideration of alternate explanations

Experiment: the condition can be altered by an appropriate experimental regimen

Specificity: this is established when a single putative cause produces a speficic effect

Coherence: this association should be compatible with existing theory and knowledge

27
Q

How do you calculate odds exposure in cases and odds exposure in controls? [2]

A

Odds exposure cases: number of exposed cases x number of unexposed controls

Odds exposure controls: number of exposed controls x number of unexposed cases

28
Q

What are relative and odds ratios like in case control studies when the disease is rare [1] and when disease is common? [1]

A

Relative risk and odds ratio are similar when disease is rare, but different when disease is common