Case Law and Definitions Flashcards
(47 cards)
Rape
Person A rapes person B if Person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by Person A’s penis, -
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection and;
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Sexual Connection
Sexual connection means—
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of—
(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)
Unlawful Sexual Connection
Person A has sexual connection with person B
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection and;
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Introduction / Penetration
Introduction and penetration have the same meaning. Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proving penetration
Proof of penetration may be established by:
- Complainant’s evidence
- Medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
- The defendant’s admissions.
Genitalia
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ, analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia
R v Koroheke
Genitalia
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior … they include the vulva [and] the labia, both interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.
Penis
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex).
Consent
Consent is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
R v Cox
Consent
Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed … freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.
R v Koroheke
Consent
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable. For example, submission by a woman because she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or co-operate, is not true consent.
R v Adams
Consent and the Belief in consent is to be considered at the time the act took place
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test, the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
R v Herbert
Reluctant consent
The Court held that a true consent may be given reluctantly or hesitantly and may be regretted afterwards, but if the consent is given even in such a manner, provided it is without fear of the application of force or the result of actual or threatened force, then the act of sexual connection would not be rape.
Matters that do not constitute consent
CA61; S128A
PFAAIMM
A person does not consent to sexual activity:
- Lack of Protest or Resistance
- Allows dues to Force, Fear, Threat
- Asleep or Unconscious
- Affected by Alcohol or Drugs
- Effected by Intellectual or Physical Disability
- Mistaken as to ID of offender
- Mistaken as to the nature and quality of Act
Crown must Prove (Consent)
Subjective
The Complainant was not consenting
Subjective
The Defendant did not believe the complainant was consenting
Objective
No person would have a reasonable belief that the complainant was consenting
Assault
Assault means the act of intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to the person of another, directly or indirectly, or threatening by any act or gesture to apply such force to the person of another, if the person making the threat has, or causes the other to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, the present ability to effect his purpose.
Intent
Firstly there must be an intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result.
R v Collister
Circumstantial evidence from which an offender’s intent may be inferred can include:
- The offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event
- The surrounding circumstances
- The nature of the act itself.
Intent to commit an offence
The Crown must prove that the defendant intended to commit the full act of sexual violation, and acted as he did for the purpose of achieving that aim.
Attempts
S72 Attempts
(1) Intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his or her object.
(whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not)
More than mere preparation
Proximately connected with the intended offence
R v Harpur
An attempt includes “an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime”.
Indecent Act Legislation
For the purposes of this Act, one person does an indecent act on another person whether he or she—
(a) does an indecent act with or on the other person; or
(b) induces or permits the other person to do an indecent act with or on him or her.
R v Cox
Consent Child
“exceptional and rare circumstances” that a child under 12 could give legal consent.