Case Names Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

Fundamental right to marry - back child support

A

Zablocki v. Redhail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fundamental right to custody of child (not here)

A

Michael H. v. Gerald D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

First case to recognize fundamental right to marry

A

Loving v. Virginia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Right to privacy includes right to abortion

A

Roe v. Wade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Current abortion standard

A

Planned parenthood v. Casey (undue burden test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Separate but equal is not equal under the equal protection clause

A

Brown v. Board of Education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Test for discriminatory purpose

A

Village of Arlington Heights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Old standard for gender classification - strict scrutiny

A

Frontiero v. Richardson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gender classifications receive intermediate scrutiny - Gov. can show important purpose through an exceedingly persuasive justification.

A

VMI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Affirmative Action

A

Fisher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Content-based restrictions must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest.

A

Reed v. Town of Gilbert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Distinction between vagueness and over-breadth

A

Jews for Jesus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example for when prior restraint is allowed

A

New York Times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Test for incitement of illegal activity

A

Brandenburg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

two situations for fighting words (unprotected speech)

A

Chaplinsky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

states may not regulate categories of unprotected speech, such as “fighting words,” on the basis of content

17
Q

Test for obscene speech

18
Q

Indecent speech (less protected speech)

A

Cohen v. California

19
Q

Flag burning case- Application of O’Brien test

A

Texas v. Johnson

20
Q

Corporate spending is symbolic speech

A

Citizens United

21
Q

Test for symbolic speech

22
Q

Content-neutral rule

A

Ward v. Rock Against Racism

23
Q

A state may curtail a person’s freedom of speech directed at unwilling listeners as a proper content-neutral, reasonable time, place, and manner restriction.

A

Hill v. Colorado

24
Q

Substantial disturbance (school forum test)

25
Bong hits for Jesus
Frederick
26
Off campus speech test
Mahanoy
27
the government must protect the rights of those who object to same-sex relationships on religious or philosophical grounds.
Masterpiece Cake Shop
28
Test for Establishment Clause
Lemon
29
School prayers are impermissible
Santa Fe Indpt. School Dist.
30
Free exercise test
Smith
31
Right to privacy - marriage is within the zone of privacy
Griswold v. Conn.
32
Test for entanglement
Lugar
33
Entwinement case
Brentwood academy
34
Public function standard
Jackson v. Met. Ed.
35
Content-based TPM restriction
Boos v. Berry
36
Secondary effects of speech
City of Renton v. Playtime Theater
37
Example of race-based classification
Korematsu v. United States