cases Flashcards
(17 cards)
green v. lupo
motorcycle: and easment is not in gross if anything in the deed indicates that it is connected to the land
cox v. glenbrook
an apputertenant easement runs with the land even when subdivided, can maintain the easement
henley v. continental cable
when gross easement is exclusive it is apportionable
granite properties
8 interences of intent
shopping center
8 inferences of intent.
1. who is claiming the easement
2. terms of the conveyance
3. consideration
4. was there a simultaniouse conveyance
5. extent of necessity
6. manner in which the land was used prior
7. was the manner of use know to the parties
finn v. williams
roads closed not way off farm
dormant easement
neponsit
increase of Touch and concernt to PUPE
in substance not in form
berger
mass case wiht 30 years covenant
rules for extension need to be in origina document
evans v. pollack
easetmetn
lakefront case
balaning values of both parties
characteistics of the land
time was an isseu
commone general scheme
not all parcels intended to have the burden
simmons properties
need to look at:
does the change lessen the utility of the easemetn
- increase the burden on the onwer of the easemetn in it use or enjoyment
- does it frustrate the purpose for which it was created
town of bethany beach
** Relative Hardship Doctrine:** A covenant will not be enforced if the harm caused by
enforcement will be greater by a “considerable magnitude” than not enforcing it.
Changed conditions doctrine: Covenants will not be enforced of conditions have
changed so drastically inside the neighborhood restricted by the covenants that
enforcement will be of “no substantial benefit” to the dominant estates.
johnson
Remedies? p.949
Buyer’s Remedies
Specific Performance
Damages
Rescission
Vendee’s Lien
Seller’s Remedies
Specific Performance
Damages
Rescission & Forfeiture of down
payment
Vendor’s Lien
In Re Ward
Essential Terms of a Deed
It must:
1) Identify the parties
2) Describe the property being
conveyed
3) State the grantor’s intent to
convey the property interest in
question
4) Contain the grantor’s signature
5) A notary stamp if being recorded
It does not need:
1) To be recorded (delivery is
sufficient)
In Re Ward
the wife that died and husband tried to take everything
Takeaways - In Re Estate of Ward
- There is no longer a requirement, as there was at common law, that a deed or instrument to effect conveyance of real
property have all the formal parts of a deed formerly recognized at common law or contain technical words. If from the
whole instrument a grantor and grantee can be ascertained, and there are operative words or words of grant showing an
intention by the grantor to convey title to a real property interest (which is sufficiently described) to the grantee, and is signed
and acknowledged by the grantor[,] it is a deed which accomplishes a legally effective conveyance. - Delivery of a deed has two elements: (1) the grantor must place the deed within the control of the grantee (2) with the
intention that the instrument becomes operative as a conveyance. - How does this compare to Burns v. McCormick?
Takeaways - Sabo v. Horvath
Takeaways - Sabo v. Horvath
- A deed recorded outside the chain of title does not meet notice requirement
- Unfairness on both sides, but weight goes to title requirement
fraud and forgery
Fraud and Forgery
Bonafide Purchaser - A bona fide purchaser is someone who exchanges value for property without
any reason to suspect irregularities in the transaction.
What happens when a deed is fraudulently conveyed or forged?
-Ask: Void or Voidable?
Void – conveys no title, the conveyor had no power to convey title (Bonafide purchaser is not protected)
-Forged deeds are void absolutely
Voidable – conveys title, Bonafide purchaser is protected (harmed party can seek damages)
-Fraudulent deeds are usually voidable (as opposed to void)
-Victim induced to transfer deed fraudulently can void the deed, but not once a Bonafide
purchaser gets involved.
Brock v. Yale - Takeaways
Brock v. Yale - Takeaways
-When a deed is forged, one cannot get good title even if a Bonafide purchaser
-Tenant in common can convey only their interest in property.
McCoy v. Love - Takeaways
McCoy v. Love - Takeaways
Fraud in the inducement = voidable (NOT VOID)
Grantor knew she was conveying a deed, it was her responsibility to inform
herself of what the deed said. (THIS WAS NOT THE EQUIVALENT OF A
FORGERY)
Subsequent Bonafide purchaser can get good title.