Cases Flashcards

(47 cards)

0
Q

Gitlow V New York

1922

A

Gitlow publishes stuff with no real consequence
First amendment - prohibits NY ability to punish overthrow of gov’t?

Opinion- no: 1st applies to states thru 14th, but dangerous tendencies=punishable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Barron V Baltimore (1833)

A

Shipyard taken over
Fifth Amendment - does it deny states the right to take private property?

Opinion - no, just feds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Near V Minnesota

1929

A

Scandal sheets banned
Prior restraint=okay?

Opinion- no. Cannot prohibit speech in advance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Palko V Connecticut

1937

A

5th amendment- does it stop states from double jeopardizing?

Opinion - no: protection against double jeopardy not fundamental so not incorporated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reynolds V US

1878

A

First amendment - prohibits laws against bigamy?

No - does not protect religious practices judged to be criminal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Engel V Vitale

1961

A

First amendment - prohibits voluntary, nondenominational prayer in schools?

Yes. No religious activities in public policies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Abington Schools V Schempp

1962

A

First amendment - prohibits mandatory religious practice with an opt-out?

Yes. Violates establishment and free exercise clauses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lemon V Kurtzman

1972

A

Stipends for private religious schools unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Christian Legal Society Chapter V Martinez

2009

A

Law school not recognized
First amendment - okay to deny student organization rights to religious organizations?

Yes. Okay to make all registered student organizations accept all people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Schenck V US

1918

A

Anti-draft advocate
First amendment - protects speech against draft

No. Clear and present danger in wartime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Brandenburg V Ohio

1968

A

KKK rally in the boonies
First amendment - KKK hate speech protected?

Sometimes. Test for prohibition: (1)aims produce imminent lawless action AND (2) is likely to produce this action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

NY Times V US

1970

A

Pentagon papers
Prior restraint okay with classified info (pentagon papers)?

No. No immediate threat=no prior restraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nebraska Press Association V Stuart

1975

A

Murder trial
First amendment - prior restraint okay if it guarantees rights to fair trial?

No. Does not fix the problem enough to balance denial of free press.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stromberg V California

A

Display flag opposing US okay?

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tinker V Des Moines

1968

A

First amendment - black armbands OK in schools?

Yes. Must materially and substantially interfere with school to be suppressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

RAV V St. Paul

1991

A

Cross burning
First amendment - protects racial speech if it is otherwise okay?

Yes. If speech is okay in one case, it can’t be not okay because of ethnicity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NY Times V Sullivan

1963

A

New York Times libel against Montgomery city commissioner

First amendment - must prove speech harmed him and were known to be false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Roth V US

A

Obscene circulars

First amendment - obscenity (contemporary community standards) not protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Miller V California

1971

A

Obscene mailers

First - not protected. Test )prurient )offensive )lacks value

19
Q

De Jonge V Oregon

1936

A

Communism + Criminal syndicalism

14th - speaking at communist meetings okay, speech must be examined by itself

20
Q

Dred Scott V Sandford

1856

A

Dred Scott sues for freedom

Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, slaves have no citizenship, therefore can’t sue

21
Q

US V Miller

1939

A

Sawed off shotgun = not protected

22
Q

D.C. V Heller

2007

A

DC gun ban for non-militia

2nd - guns can be kept for personal protection, not just militia

23
Q

McDonald V Chicago

2009

A

Illinois gun bans

2nd - incorporated at state level

24
Miranda V Arizona | 1965
Miranda rights | Cannot use statements gained without notifying people of their rights
25
Weeks V US | 1913
Betting slips with no warrant 4th - seizure of property with no warrant directly prohibited, can't be used in a case "Exclusionary rule"
26
Mapp V Ohio | 1960
Obscene materials, illegal search | 4th right to lawful search/seizure incorporated
27
Gideon V Wainwright | 1962
``` No lawyer granted in FLA 6th incorporated (right to counsel) ```
28
Furman V Georgia | 1971
Death penalty accidental death in burglary Death penalty sometimes unconstitutional (8th)
29
Gregg V Georgia | 1975
Burglary and murder death penalty Death penalty OK in extreme criminal cases.
30
McKleskey V Kemp | 1986
Black man sentenced to death, statistically more common Death penalty OK unless clear racial bias in those specific proceedings
31
House V Bell | 2005
Death sentence new info Reasonable doubt=enough cause for new trial on new evidence
32
Griswold V Connecticut | 1964
Contraceptive counseling Right to privacy established, laws against contraceptives bad
33
Roe V Wade | 1971
Abortion Right to abortion? Yes, depending on trimester.
34
Webster V Reproductive Health Services | 1988
More steps before abortions (viability tests) restrictions on state aid Restrictions OK because no mandate to help and compelling state interest for viability tests
35
Planned Parenthood V Casey | 1991
Abortion waiting period, parental consent OK because no "undue burden"
36
Stenberg V Carhart | 1999
Partial birth abortions=murder Not okay in this case because undue burden + no clause for safety of mother
37
Gonzales V Carhart | 2006
Congressional partial birth abortion ban OK because 1 type and not medically necessary and not undue burden
38
Bowers V Hardwick | 1985
Sodomy Can be prohibited
39
Lawrence & Garner V Texas | 2002
Gay sex in the home Constitutionally protected
40
Lee V Weismann | 1992
No prayer at middle school grad ceremony
41
Osborne V Ohio | 1990
Child pornography = not okay
42
Terry V Ohio | 1968
Stop and Terry frisk okay if reasonable suspicion
43
McClesky V Zant | 1990ish
Limits appeals of death penalty cases
44
Atkins V Virginia
Bars execution of mentally retarded
45
Roper V Simmons
Bars execution under 18
46
Cruzan V Missouri Dept. of Health | 1990
Living will required to stop vegetative state treatment