Cases Flashcards

1
Q

What happened in the Hedley Berne v Heller case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Bankers, disclosure statement, value of business
  • Negligent mistatement - contracting out
  • Held that the disclosure removed liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What happened in the Pascoe Properties v Attorney General case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Agency, ostensible v actual authority and how silence can create authority
  • Held not authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happened in the Holmes v Australisian Holdings case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Takapuna, premise search, AHL provides signed offer, Holmes, doesn’t get full signature and communciated, AHL cancels, “Hit us with a contract”
  • No contract exists - intention of parties was obvious by words to only be formed when both signed - despite S24(1) PLA 2007
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happened in the Markholm Construction v WCC case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Ballot, Bilateral contract, tender, invitation to treat vs offer, unilateral offer
  • Held: council had committed to carry out ballot but to do now would result in massive loss and be ineffecient
  • Held: amalgamation of votes was wrong as not stipulated
    Givien: damages based on probability and value forfeited.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happened in the Tri-star Customs v Denning case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Tri-star sued due to mistake

- Tri-star had constructive knowledge, which was insufficient for proving mistake to be unilateral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened in the KB & QB v REAA & Li case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • House & INcome // “The single most important requirement”
  • Issue: Was the agent misconduct by not investigating the premise to his/her claim
  • Held: yes, ought to have duty to invesitage to a reasonable depth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Closurepac NZ Limited v WS 2014 Limited What happened in the case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Misrepresentation to Nominee or not
  • Held: Yes, but Closure Couldn’t sue due to the misrepresentations sitting outside the contract documentation and thus, S24(1) CCLA 2017 non applhy
  • Director did not entilte
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson - What happened in the case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Ginger beer / Rotten Snail / Shock, vomit
  • Neighbour principle - reasonably ought
  • Duty of care owed to neighbour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Maketu Estates Ltd v Robb - What happened in the case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Robb = agent // Maketu = Vendor // Lemon = Unsucc. Buyer // Jones = Succ
  • Robb had a bias and was liable for difference on market value and the passed transaction value despite being of good character and in good faith
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Wakelin v RH & EA Jackson - What happened in the case and what is the main legal issues it relates to?

A
  • Crumbs / 1/2 mile competitor claim / opened / $7000 week to $6000 week claim
  • Damages of $21,000 awarded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly