CFA exam qs Flashcards
ch7 - Which of the following correctly reflects one of the 5 Climate Bond Initiative’s transition principles
Technological viability taken into account but not economic competitiveness
ch7 - 3 main investment reasons an analyst would prefer companies prioritising emissions reduction over using carbon offsets and abatement technologies. Which is NOT one of them
Reliance on abatement technologies may lead to increased costs
ch7 -all of the following have exhibited a strong correlation in relation to equity valuations, except for:
climate temp scenario alignment and returns
in order to reverse anthropogenic climate change, it is most accurate to state that
we must:
-> artificially move carbon dioxide from the atmosphere
(NOT - plant more trees, reach net zero emissions, remove dependence on fossil fuel energy)
For the steel industry to reach net zero within a predetermined timescale, there are
many potential priorities. Which two of the following are likely to produce the
lowest impact in the shorter term?
- to produce direct reduced iron with green hydrogen
- to capture emissions from production eg. with CCS technology
***A company has total greenhouse gas emissions of 5,000 tCO2e. They spend
£150,000 on sustainably-generated power, £200,000 on gas-produced power,
£100,000 on carbon offsets and £30,000 on complying with emission-reduction
regulations. The company’s INTERNAL CARBON PRICE is closest to:
£50 / tCO2e.
internal carbon price is the total cost of internal initiatives, green power purchases and carbon offsets, all divided by total emissions
(150 + 100) / 5 = £50 / tCo2e
Carbon based power is excluded, as are (external) regulatory costs
Engagement, as part of investment management, is LEAST likely to include:
shareholders voting on resolutions
(voting would take place at a general meeting and is not, when done by shareholders themselves, part of engagement)
The TCFD recommended disclosures under the “Governance” pillar in relation
to management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and
opportunities least likely includes which of the following?
The impact of identified climate-related risks and opportunities on the
business, strategy and financial planning.
The impact of identified risks on the
business etc fall under the “strategy” column, and not “governance”.
Compared to a smaller capitalisation listed company, a larger listed company is
LEAST likely to have greater:
Cost of capital. [MORE LIKELY TO BE LOWER THAN HIGHER]
(not liquidity, disclosures or transparency)
The TPI management assessment levels are:
Level 0: Unaware of CC as a business issue
* Level 1: Acknowledges CC as a business issue
* Level 2: Building capacity
* Level 3: Integrating into operational decision-making
* Level 4: Strategic assessment
By comparison to other forms of private equity investing, venture capital
investments most likely
Have fewer legacy assets
VC investing is typically in smaller, earlier stage companies with no
legacy assets and therefore less exposure to transition and physical climate
risks.
A limited partner is considering a blind pool investment in a private equity
firm. Their most useful source of information is:
The track record of the general partners.
[they must rely on assurances gained
through interrogating the GPs, their climate policies and track record.]
Empirical evidence of a link between investor activity and real-world impact
by investee companies is least likely to be seen when:
The fund has an impact-based mandate.
The Paris Aligned Investment Initiative Net Zero Investment Framework, or
PAII, has framework sections under “Portfolio / fund level” that include the
following, except for which one?
Implementing alignment
[The three sections of “Portfolio / fund level” are (1) Governance and
strategy, (2) Portfolio reference targets and (3) Strategic asset allocation.
Implementation alignment falls under the “Asset class level”.]
A financial institution uses the SBTi Portfolio Coverage Approach to create an
engagement objective for its investees to adopt science-based targets, with
notional start date in 2020. For which of the following coverage statistics are
they complying with the methodology appropriately?
75% by 2035.
[Under the SBTi Portfolio Coverage Approach, the proportion of investees
that use SBTi-approved science-based targets should reach 100% by 2040,
along a linear path. Hence beginning in 2020 would require at least 50% by
2030, 75% by 2035 and 100% by 2040.]
Companies YYY and ZZZ are both in the chemicals sector. YYY began to
decarbonise ten years ago and has made significant progress. ZZZ is at a much
earlier stage. Both companies now wish to use the SBTi absolute contraction
method for their Scopes 1 and 2 emissions. The required percentage reductions
per year for the two companies from now onwards should be:
The same.
[Under the SBTi absolute contraction method, the requirement is 4.2% per
year (based on the same initial date), regardless of where the companies
are in their decarbonisation trajectory]
EU Taxonomy Alignment…
100% aligned, as both wind turbine construction (80%)
and sustainable logistics (20%) are aligned.
Solar panel technology (75%) is aligned, and
above the 70% threshold. Nuclear power is not aligned
s 100% aligned, as PV panel production is included
. Electric rail service (60%) is aligned; the
courier service (40%) may or may not be taxonomy-aligned, and
we err on the cautious side by assuming it is not. Hence OO is
below the 70% threshold
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ALIGNMENT of portfolio
LL: $28m. Aligned 100% = $28m.
* MM: $15m. Aligned 75% = $11.25m.
* NN: $34m. Aligned 100% = $34m.
* Pre1: $20m. Aligned 85% = $17m.
* Pre2: $18m. Aligned 75% = $13.5m.
Total investment is 28 + 15 + 34 + 20 + 18 = 115
Total aligned investment is 28 + 11.25 + 34 + 17 + 13.5 = 103.75
Hence weighted average alignment = 103.75 ÷ 115 = 90.22%.
aligned investment divided by total investment
Within the energy sector, the highest contribution of greenhouse gases is from:
Heating, cooling and powering buildings.
Which of the following statements least accurately describes a challenge to
passive climate-focused investing?
A low-carbon index may unintentionally be biased towards energy and
agriculture sectors.
[A low-carbon index may have an unintentional bias away from the
traditionally high-carbon sectors of energy and agriculture. Although this
achieves the low-carbon content, it omits sectors that should be
transformational as the economy transitions to lower carbon
***An analyst is looking at a marginal abatement cost curve, or MACC. Projects
range from –100 to +100 in terms of dollars per tonne of emitted greenhouse
gases. She draws on this diagram a line representing a proposed carbon price, set
at $25. Her most accurate conclusion should be that it is economically
worthwhile to fund projects that are:
Below the +$25 level.
[The column height of each project is the abatement cost per tonne of GHG
emissions. With no carbon prices, all negative values are worthwhile, as
carbon savings represent a positive dollar return. If a carbon price of $25 is
set, then positive values (i.e. per tonne costs) below this level also become
economically viable. Hence worthwhile projects are now those with (1)
positive costs below $25/tonne or (2) negative costs]
Of the five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, which of the following has the
lowest challenges for mitigation?
SSP4 (inequality) [and ssp1 sustainability low mitigation challenges]
[ssp 2 moderate, ssp3 (regional rivalry and ssp5 (rapid growth) have high mitigation challenges]
A conflict of interest is least likely to arise when:
The investor wishes to vote against a resolution
When analysing a company’s carbon emissions, using a sectoral average as a
benchmark is least likely inappropriate because:
Sectoral averages can be computed in multiple ways