Ch 1 Flashcards

(65 cards)

1
Q

founder of American psychology William Jones

A

William Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

as the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

A

psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

levels of analysis psychology is a discipline that spans multiple

as the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

A

psychology is a discipline that spans multiple

as the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

like a ladder, lower levels tied to biological influences or the brain and higher levels tied to social influences or the mind. levels of analysis

levels of analysis psychology is a discipline that spans multiple

as the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

A

levels of analysis

levels of analysis psychology is a discipline that spans multiple

as the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

biological factors. what do psychologists believe is critical in understanding the causes of behavior?

like a ladder, lower levels tied to biological influences or the brain and higher levels tied to social influences or the mind. levels of analysis

levels of analysis psychology is a discipline that spans multiple

as the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

A

what do psychologists believe is critical in understanding the causes of behavior?

like a ladder, lower levels tied to biological influences or the brain and higher levels tied to social influences or the mind. levels of analysis

levels of analysis psychology is a discipline that spans multiple

as the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior psychology

founder of American psychology William Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

A

challenges for psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

behavior can be caused by many factors multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

A

multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

variations among people in their thinking, emotion, personality, and behavior. individual differences

behavior can be caused by many factors multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

A

individual differences

behavior can be caused by many factors multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

we mutually influence each other’s behavior reciprocal determinism

variations among people in their thinking, emotion, personality, and behavior. individual differences

behavior can be caused by many factors multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

A

reciprocal determinism

variations among people in their thinking, emotion, personality, and behavior. individual differences

behavior can be caused by many factors multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

can lead to believe something different why cant we always trust our common sense?

we mutually influence each other’s behavior reciprocal determinism

variations among people in their thinking, emotion, personality, and behavior. individual differences

behavior can be caused by many factors multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

A

why cant we always trust our common sense?

we mutually influence each other’s behavior reciprocal determinism

variations among people in their thinking, emotion, personality, and behavior. individual differences

behavior can be caused by many factors multiply determined

multiply determined, psychological influences aren’t independent, individual differences, reciprocal determinism, cultural influences challenges for psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

generate predictions that can be tested. for a theory to be scientific, what must it do?

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

for a theory to be scientific, what must it do?

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

educated guess hypothesis

generate predictions that can be tested. for a theory to be scientific, what must it do?

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

hypothesis

generate predictions that can be tested. for a theory to be scientific, what must it do?

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

tendency to seek out evidence that supports our hypotheses and deny, dismiss, or distort evidence that contradicts them; seek and you shall find confirmation bias

educated guess hypothesis

generate predictions that can be tested. for a theory to be scientific, what must it do?

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

A

confirmation bias

educated guess hypothesis

generate predictions that can be tested. for a theory to be scientific, what must it do?

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

A

belief perseverance

tendency to seek out evidence that supports our hypotheses and deny, dismiss, or distort evidence that contradicts them; seek and you shall find confirmation bias

educated guess hypothesis

generate predictions that can be tested. for a theory to be scientific, what must it do?

generate predictions what does a good scientific theory do?

explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world scientific theory

the premise that knowledge should initially be acquired thru observation empiricism

belief that we see the world precisely as it is naïve realism

we’re prone to naïve realism why do we trust our common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

A

metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

A

pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in?

set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

A

what does pseudoscience lack in?

set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis, lack of self correction, overreliance on anecdotes warning signs for pseudoscience

safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in?

set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

A

warning signs for pseudoscience

safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in?

set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

an escape hatch or loophole that defenders of a theory use to protect their theory from falsification ad hoc immunizing hypothesis

overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis, lack of self correction, overreliance on anecdotes warning signs for pseudoscience

safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in?

set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

A

ad hoc immunizing hypothesis

overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis, lack of self correction, overreliance on anecdotes warning signs for pseudoscience

safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in?

set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t pseudoscience

assertions about the world that’s not testable b. metaphysical claim

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
the tendency to detect meaningful patterns in random stimuli v patternicity an escape hatch or loophole that defenders of a theory use to protect their theory from falsification ad hoc immunizing hypothesis overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis, lack of self correction, overreliance on anecdotes warning signs for pseudoscience safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in? set of claims that seems scientific but isn't pseudoscience assertions about the world that's not testable b. metaphysical claim tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance
patternicity an escape hatch or loophole that defenders of a theory use to protect their theory from falsification ad hoc immunizing hypothesis overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis, lack of self correction, overreliance on anecdotes warning signs for pseudoscience safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in? set of claims that seems scientific but isn't pseudoscience assertions about the world that's not testable b. metaphysical claim tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance
26
proposes that our awareness of our death leaves us with an underlying sense of terror with which we cope by adopting reassuring cultural worldviews terror management theory the tendency to detect meaningful patterns in random stimuli v patternicity an escape hatch or loophole that defenders of a theory use to protect their theory from falsification ad hoc immunizing hypothesis overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis, lack of self correction, overreliance on anecdotes warning signs for pseudoscience safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in? set of claims that seems scientific but isn't pseudoscience assertions about the world that's not testable b. metaphysical claim tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance
terror management theory the tendency to detect meaningful patterns in random stimuli v patternicity an escape hatch or loophole that defenders of a theory use to protect their theory from falsification ad hoc immunizing hypothesis overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis, lack of self correction, overreliance on anecdotes warning signs for pseudoscience safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science what does pseudoscience lack in? set of claims that seems scientific but isn't pseudoscience assertions about the world that's not testable b. metaphysical claim tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them belief perseverance
27
traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
logical fallacies
28
emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
29
uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
30
error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
31
error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
32
most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
33
wasting time and money, giving up correct resources, causes harm i.e. rebirth therapy dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
34
approach of evaluating all claims with an open mind but insisting on persuasive evidence before accepting scientific skepticism wasting time and money, giving up correct resources, causes harm i.e. rebirth therapy dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
scientific skepticism wasting time and money, giving up correct resources, causes harm i.e. rebirth therapy dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
35
keep an open mind, and willing to accept after successful tests. Carl Sagan says to be a scientific skeptic, we should adopt 2 attitudes that may be contradictory but aren't approach of evaluating all claims with an open mind but insisting on persuasive evidence before accepting scientific skepticism wasting time and money, giving up correct resources, causes harm i.e. rebirth therapy dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
Carl Sagan says to be a scientific skeptic, we should adopt 2 attitudes that may be contradictory but aren't approach of evaluating all claims with an open mind but insisting on persuasive evidence before accepting scientific skepticism wasting time and money, giving up correct resources, causes harm i.e. rebirth therapy dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
36
set of skills for evaluating all claims in an open minded and careful fashion critical thinking keep an open mind, and willing to accept after successful tests. Carl Sagan says to be a scientific skeptic, we should adopt 2 attitudes that may be contradictory but aren't approach of evaluating all claims with an open mind but insisting on persuasive evidence before accepting scientific skepticism wasting time and money, giving up correct resources, causes harm i.e. rebirth therapy dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
critical thinking keep an open mind, and willing to accept after successful tests. Carl Sagan says to be a scientific skeptic, we should adopt 2 attitudes that may be contradictory but aren't approach of evaluating all claims with an open mind but insisting on persuasive evidence before accepting scientific skepticism wasting time and money, giving up correct resources, causes harm i.e. rebirth therapy dangers in pseudoscience? most people are unaware of their biases but are aware of them in others. bias blind spot error of believing that we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people- "I wouldn't think that!" not me fallacy error of assuming that a claim is correct because many believe it- "If they believe... then I too!" bandwagon fallacy uses emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim- "I refuse to believe..." emotional reasoning fallacy emotional reasoning, bandwagon, not me 3 logical fallacies for evaluating psychological claims traps in thinking that can lead to mistaken conclusions logical fallacies
37
rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
6 scientific thinking principles
38
error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
39
anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
40
when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
41
remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
42
capable of being disproved falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
43
when a study's findings are able to be duplicated, ideally by independent investigators replicability capable of being disproved falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
replicability capable of being disproved falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
44
fact that the sixe of certain psychological findings appears to be shrinking over time decline effect when a study's findings are able to be duplicated, ideally by independent investigators replicability capable of being disproved falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
decline effect when a study's findings are able to be duplicated, ideally by independent investigators replicability capable of being disproved falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
45
if two explanations account equally well for a phenomenon, we should generally select the more simple one Occam's razor fact that the sixe of certain psychological findings appears to be shrinking over time decline effect when a study's findings are able to be duplicated, ideally by independent investigators replicability capable of being disproved falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
Occam's razor fact that the sixe of certain psychological findings appears to be shrinking over time decline effect when a study's findings are able to be duplicated, ideally by independent investigators replicability capable of being disproved falsifiable remember that a correlation between two things doesn't demonstrate a causal connection between them. correlation isn't causation when we evaluate a psychological claim we should ask if we've excluded other plausible explanations. ruling out rival hypotheses anything that can vary variable error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other correlation causation fallacy rule out rival hypotheses, correlation isn't causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims, Occam's razor 6 scientific thinking principles
46
developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
Wilhelm Wundt
47
method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
48
structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
49
school of psych that aimed to identify the basic elements of psychological experience; asked the what structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
50
founded structuralism Ed Titchener school of psych that aimed to identify the basic elements of psychological experience; asked the what structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
Ed Titchener school of psych that aimed to identify the basic elements of psychological experience; asked the what structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
51
introspectionists disagreed on subjective reports; Oswald Kulpe showed that participants engaged in imageless thought 2 problems that caused structuralism to extinct founded structuralism Ed Titchener school of psych that aimed to identify the basic elements of psychological experience; asked the what structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
2 problems that caused structuralism to extinct founded structuralism Ed Titchener school of psych that aimed to identify the basic elements of psychological experience; asked the what structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
52
aimed at understanding the adaptive purposes of psychological characteristics; asks the why functionalism introspectionists disagreed on subjective reports; Oswald Kulpe showed that participants engaged in imageless thought 2 problems that caused structuralism to extinct founded structuralism Ed Titchener school of psych that aimed to identify the basic elements of psychological experience; asked the what structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
functionalism introspectionists disagreed on subjective reports; Oswald Kulpe showed that participants engaged in imageless thought 2 problems that caused structuralism to extinct founded structuralism Ed Titchener school of psych that aimed to identify the basic elements of psychological experience; asked the what structuralism structuralism, functionalism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and psychoanalysis. 5 major theoretical perspectives that shaped contemporary psychological thought method by which trained observers carefully reflect and report on their mental experiences v. introspection developed the first full fledged psych lab in Germany. Wilhelm Wundt
53
founder of functionalism. Will James
Will James
54
functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
55
principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
56
founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
57
focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
58
proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
59
new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
60
founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
61
focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
62
discipline that applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behavior Bevo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
evo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
63
what extent are our behaviors freely selected rather than caused by factors outside our control? free will determinism debate discipline that applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behavior Bevo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
free will determinism debate discipline that applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behavior Bevo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
64
research that looks at how the mind works basic research what extent are our behaviors freely selected rather than caused by factors outside our control? free will determinism debate discipline that applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behavior Bevo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
basic research what extent are our behaviors freely selected rather than caused by factors outside our control? free will determinism debate discipline that applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behavior Bevo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
65
research that looks at how we can use basic research to solve real world probs applied research research that looks at how the mind works basic research what extent are our behaviors freely selected rather than caused by factors outside our control? free will determinism debate discipline that applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behavior Bevo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James
applied research research that looks at how the mind works basic research what extent are our behaviors freely selected rather than caused by factors outside our control? free will determinism debate discipline that applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behavior Bevo psych focuses on internal psychological processes which we're unaware of; goal is to decode Freudian slips psychoanalysis founder of psychoanalysis freud new field in psych that looks at the relation between brain functioning and thinking cog neuroscience proposes that thinking is central to understanding behavior; not rewards and punishments but by insight b. cog psych focuses on uncovering the general laws of learning by looking at observable behavior; rewards and punishments behaviorism founder of behaviorism John Watson principle that organisms that possess adaptations survive and reproduce at a higher rate than do other organisms. natural selection functionalists was inspired by who? Darwin's natural selection founder of functionalism. Will James