Ch 1: Nature of Negotiation Flashcards

1
Q

What is the author’s approach to negotiation

A

A win-win situation

A complex social process

Process by which two parties attempt to resolve their opposing interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Several characteristics of negotiation situation

A
  1. There are two or more parties
  2. Conflict of needs and desires between the parties and it needs to be resolved
  3. Parties negotiate by choice
  4. When we negotiate we expect a give and take process that is fundamental to our understanding of the term negotiation
  5. Parties prefer to negotiate than fight openly and make. a scene
  6. Successful negotiation involves management of the tangibles( the price or terms of agreement) and intangibles( psychological motivators- need to be right, win, look tough
  7. Interdependence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Interdependence

A

Means that the parties rely in each other, they need each other to function

They may have to work together

Or they choose to, because they can get better outcomes if you do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 5 types of Interdependence

A

Sequential
Pooled
Reciprocated
Task
Goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Zero-sum or distributive situations

A

Persons try to split limited resources. Typically one person achieves goal and the other doesn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does type of Interdependence affect outcomes

A

I dont know- look up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do alternatives shape Interdependence

A

If parties have a better alternative to working together, they will go fo it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is BATNA

A

Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement..
Next best thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is mutual adjustment

A

Parties must make some adjustment to their position to reach an agreement that satisfies both

So Both can influence each other to make adjustments to their stance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What us a concession

A

Reducing range of options within which a solution can be reached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Two dilemmas if mutual concession

A

Dilemma of honesty: how much of the truth to share with other party

Dilemma of trust: how much should u belive what the other party says

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is value creating and value claiming

A

Non-zero sum: when goals are linked in such a way that one person’s goal achievement helps another achieve their goals

In distributive bargaining the aim is to claim value as there can only be one winner

In integrative bargaining the aim is to find solutions in which both parties can do well and achieve their goals
(Finding satisfactory solutions is the creating of value)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Most negotiations are a combination of seeking to claim value and create value. What then are the 3 implications of this?

A
      1. Negotiators must be able to recognize situations that require more of one approach than the other: those that require predominantly distributive strategy and tactics, and those that require integrative strategy and tactics

Distributive: when time and money limited, when other party is likely to be competitive, no chance of interaction in the future

  1. Negotiators must be versatile in their comfort and use of both major strategic approaches
  2. Negotiator perceptions of situations tend to be biased toward seeing problems as more distributive/competitive than they really are. Accurately perceiving the nature of the interdependence between the parties is critical for successful negotiation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 4 differences in negotiators

A

Differences in interest

Differences in judgments about the future.

Differences in risk tolerance.

Differences in time preference

while value is often created by exploiting common interests, differences can also serve as the basis for creating value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is conflict

A

Conflict may be defined as a “sharp disagreement or opposition, as of interests, ideas, etc.” and includes “the perceived divergence of interest, or a belief that the parties’ current as

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the four levels of conflict

A

Intrapersonal or intrapsychic conflict

Interpersonal conflict.

Intra group conflict

Intergroup conflict

17
Q

Elements that contribute to negative perception of conflict

A
  1. Competitive win-loss goals
  2. Misperception and bias
  3. Emotionality
  4. Decreased communication
  5. Blurred issues
  6. Rigid commitments
  7. Maximised differences and minimized similarities
  8. Escalation of the conflict
18
Q

What are the 7 ways in which conflict can be productive?

A

… fill in on Sat night

19
Q

Factors that make conflict easy/difficult to manage

A

If issue is based on values, ethics or if it can be easily divided into small parts, pieces, units.

Size of stake- large/small

Interdependence- degree to which one party’s win means certain losses for the other

Continuity of interaction

Structure of parties

Involvement of 3rd parties (None- more difficult, 3rd party-less difficult)

Perceived progress of conflict: balanced

20
Q

Effective conflict management- Dual Concerns model

A

People in conflict have 2 concerns- one for self (x-axis) and one for the other(y-axis)

When party cares more for self- pursues strategies to the left; for others- to the right.

Yielding(accommodating/obliging)

Inaction(avoiding)- withdrawal/passivity/retreat/be silent/ do nothing

Compromising- the middle; let’s settle

Problem-solving (Collaborating)

Contending (Competing/dominating)- try to get other party to yield.

21
Q

When is it appropriate to use the integrating conflict management approach

A

When the issue is complex
When the synthesis of ideas is needed to come up with better solutions

Not Appropriate when:
Issue is simple
Immediate decision required

21
Q

When is it appropriate to use the obliging conflict management approach

A

When you think you are wrong

When the issue is more important to other parties.

Not appropriate:
Issue important to you
You think you are right
Other party is wrong/unethical

22
Q

When to use Dominating approach

A

Issue is trivial
Speedy decision needed
Necessary to overcome assertive subordinates

Not:
Issue complex
Issue not important to you
Decision does not need to be made quickly

23
Q

When do you use the avoiding approach?

A

Issue is trivial

Potential dysfunctional effect of controlling other parties outweighs the benefits

A cooling off period is needed

Not:
Issue is important to you
Your responsibility to make decision

Prompt attention needed

24
Q

When it is appropriate to use Compromising

A

Goals for both parties are mutually exclusive
Parties are equally powerful
Consensus cannot be reached

Not:
One party is more powerful
Problem complex enough to need a problem-solving approach