Ch 4: Choice of Law: The Erie Doctrine Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

What law governs an action commenced in U.S. district court?

A

The substantive law and rules of procedure that will govern the action must be determined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In a federal question claim, what law controls?

A

Federal substantive and procedural law, as well as federal common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What substantive law must a district court apply in a diversity action?

A

State substantive law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does a district court determine which state’s substantive law applies in a diversity action?

A

By applying the conflict-of-law rules of the forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What procedural law applies when a procedural issue in a diversity action is addressed by a valid federal law?

A

Federal law is applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens if no federal law applies to a procedural issue in a diversity action?

A

The district court must follow state law regarding substance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What law applies when a federal court exercises supplemental jurisdiction over a state-law claim?

A

The substantive law of the state where the district court is located

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the first step in determining whether an issue involves substance or procedure under the Erie doctrine?

A

Determine whether there is a conflict between state and federal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If there is a conflict between state and federal law, what must the district court determine next?

A

Whether a valid federal statute or Federal Rule covers the disputed issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must the court do if a Federal Rule is on point?

A

Determine if the Federal Rule abridges, enlarges, or modifies any substantive right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the implication if a Federal Rule does not abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right?

A

The Federal Rule must be applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What should the court consider if a Federal Rule could be considered to modify a substantive right?

A

Determine if the Federal Rule only incidentally affects a litigant’s substantive rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What should a court do if no federal statute or rule is on point?

A

Determine whether federal common law should be applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under what circumstances may federal common law apply?

A

When no applicable federal statute or constitutional provision exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what types of cases does federal common law traditionally apply?

A
  • Admiralty cases
  • Cases in which the United States is a party
  • Cases involving interstate disputes
  • Cases implicating relations with foreign countries
  • Cases in which the government acts in a proprietary role
  • When Congress has left a gap in a statutory scheme
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happens if the state’s highest court has not yet ruled on an issue?

A

The federal court must determine how the state’s highest court would rule

17
Q

What should a federal court do if no state court has considered the issue?

A

Determine how it believes the highest court in the state would rule

18
Q

What is the controlling law when a diversity case is transferred to another district court?

A

The law that would have been applied in the district court that transferred the case

19
Q

What must a U.S. district court with diversity jurisdiction do after determining state substantive law applies?

A

Apply the conflict-of-law rules of the forum state

20
Q

What issues are generally considered procedural and controlled by the law of the forum state?

A
  • The proper court in which to bring an action
  • The form of the action to be brought
  • The sufficiency of the pleadings
  • The effect of splitting a cause of action
  • The proper or necessary parties to an action
  • Whether a counterclaim may be brought
  • Venue
  • The rules of discovery
  • The right to a jury trial
  • Service of process
  • The burden of proof
  • Trial procedure
  • The methods of enforcing a judgment
21
Q

What is the reason for applying state law where transferor court is located?

A

Convenience under § 1404(a)

22
Q

What is the controlling law if a case is transferred due to improper venue under § 1406?

A

State law where transferee court is located

23
Q

What must a federal court do if the state’s highest court rules differently after the federal suit is complete?

A

The federal appeals court is bound by the state court’s ruling

24
Q

What is the distinction between the substance-procedure distinction in federal-state conflicts and state-state conflicts?

A

It is not the same substance-procedure distinction that arises in state-state conflicts under Klaxon

25
What is the purpose of conflict of laws?
To identify which state's laws will determine the parties' rights in cases with connections to multiple states ## Footnote This concept helps resolve legal disputes involving multiple jurisdictions.
26
What does choice of law commonly refer to in a federal court?
Determining whether state or federal law controls a given issue in diversity cases ## Footnote This is relevant when federal courts deal with cases that involve parties from different states.
27
In federal question jurisdiction, what law is applied?
Federal law ## Footnote This applies to cases where the issue arises under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
28
In diversity jurisdiction, what law is applied?
State law ## Footnote This applies when the parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds a specified threshold.
29
What law is applied in supplemental jurisdiction for state-law claims?
State law ## Footnote This allows federal courts to hear additional claims that are related to the original jurisdictional claim.
30
What type of issues are considered substantive?
Elements of a claim, statutes of limitations, burden of proof ## Footnote These issues relate to the rights and duties of the parties involved.
31
What type of issues are considered procedural?
Judge and jury allocation, assessment of attorney’s fees ## Footnote These issues relate to the methods and means of enforcing rights.
32
What is the general approach when determining if an issue involves substance or procedure?
Consider whether there is a conflict between state and federal law ## Footnote If no conflict exists, both laws can be applied harmoniously.
33
What does the Rules Enabling Act state about federal law?
It is arguably procedural and does not modify substantive rights ## Footnote This means that while federal rules can govern procedure, they should not change the underlying rights of parties.
34
What is the Erie Analysis used for?
To determine whether to apply state or federal law in diversity cases ## Footnote It assesses if state law is outcome-determinative and if there is no countervailing federal policy interest.
35
What are the limitations on federal district courts exercising diversity jurisdiction?
Bound by the conflict-of-laws rules of the state in which the court is located, valid under the Full Faith and Credit Clause and the Due Process Clause ## Footnote This ensures that state law is respected while adjudicating cases in federal court.
36
Can states apply their own procedural laws and substantive laws of another jurisdiction?
Yes ## Footnote States often apply their own procedural rules while sometimes applying the substantive laws from other jurisdictions based on the conflict-of-laws rules.