Ch 4: Choice of Law: The Erie Doctrine Flashcards
(36 cards)
What law governs an action commenced in U.S. district court?
The substantive law and rules of procedure that will govern the action must be determined
In a federal question claim, what law controls?
Federal substantive and procedural law, as well as federal common law
What substantive law must a district court apply in a diversity action?
State substantive law
How does a district court determine which state’s substantive law applies in a diversity action?
By applying the conflict-of-law rules of the forum state
What procedural law applies when a procedural issue in a diversity action is addressed by a valid federal law?
Federal law is applied
What happens if no federal law applies to a procedural issue in a diversity action?
The district court must follow state law regarding substance
What law applies when a federal court exercises supplemental jurisdiction over a state-law claim?
The substantive law of the state where the district court is located
What is the first step in determining whether an issue involves substance or procedure under the Erie doctrine?
Determine whether there is a conflict between state and federal law
If there is a conflict between state and federal law, what must the district court determine next?
Whether a valid federal statute or Federal Rule covers the disputed issue
What must the court do if a Federal Rule is on point?
Determine if the Federal Rule abridges, enlarges, or modifies any substantive right
What is the implication if a Federal Rule does not abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right?
The Federal Rule must be applied
What should the court consider if a Federal Rule could be considered to modify a substantive right?
Determine if the Federal Rule only incidentally affects a litigant’s substantive rights
What should a court do if no federal statute or rule is on point?
Determine whether federal common law should be applied
Under what circumstances may federal common law apply?
When no applicable federal statute or constitutional provision exists
In what types of cases does federal common law traditionally apply?
- Admiralty cases
- Cases in which the United States is a party
- Cases involving interstate disputes
- Cases implicating relations with foreign countries
- Cases in which the government acts in a proprietary role
- When Congress has left a gap in a statutory scheme
What happens if the state’s highest court has not yet ruled on an issue?
The federal court must determine how the state’s highest court would rule
What should a federal court do if no state court has considered the issue?
Determine how it believes the highest court in the state would rule
What is the controlling law when a diversity case is transferred to another district court?
The law that would have been applied in the district court that transferred the case
What must a U.S. district court with diversity jurisdiction do after determining state substantive law applies?
Apply the conflict-of-law rules of the forum state
What issues are generally considered procedural and controlled by the law of the forum state?
- The proper court in which to bring an action
- The form of the action to be brought
- The sufficiency of the pleadings
- The effect of splitting a cause of action
- The proper or necessary parties to an action
- Whether a counterclaim may be brought
- Venue
- The rules of discovery
- The right to a jury trial
- Service of process
- The burden of proof
- Trial procedure
- The methods of enforcing a judgment
What is the reason for applying state law where transferor court is located?
Convenience under § 1404(a)
What is the controlling law if a case is transferred due to improper venue under § 1406?
State law where transferee court is located
What must a federal court do if the state’s highest court rules differently after the federal suit is complete?
The federal appeals court is bound by the state court’s ruling
What is the distinction between the substance-procedure distinction in federal-state conflicts and state-state conflicts?
It is not the same substance-procedure distinction that arises in state-state conflicts under Klaxon