Ch 8 Flashcards
(48 cards)
Performance management
the process of creating a
work environment in which people can perform to
the best of their abilities
Performance reviews
a process in which a manager
evaluates an employee’s performance relative to the
requirements of the job and uses the information to
show the person where and how improvements can
be made
- More frequent, short reviews that provide employees
with feedback regularly are more effective
Purposes of Performance Management
- improving a firm’s overall
performance and profitability - developmental purposes
- administrative purposes
- Employers need to maintain accurate, objective employee performance records to defend themselves against possible charges of discrimination when it comes to promotions, salaries, and terminations
developmental purposes
- provide performance feedback
- identify individual strengths and weaknesses
- recognize individual performance achievements
- help employees identify goals
administrative purposes
- document personnel decisions
- promote employees
- identify performance problems and develop ways to correct them
- meet legal requirements
Why Performance Management Systems Sometimes Fail
Employees and managers alike often dread appraisals and complain that they are time-consuming and ineffective
What Are the Performance Standards?
Performance standards describe the accepted level of performance to be achieved by an employee
- should be based on job-related
requirements derived from a job analysis and reflected in an employee’s job description and job specifications
Calibration
a process whereby managers meet to discuss the performance of individual employees to ensure their employee evaluations are in line with one another
Acceptability
relates to how difficult it is to administer and use the performance management system
what can how managers view how well their employees are doing on the job/how they
rate them
Organizational politics, a firm’s culture and history, and current
competitive conditions
Performance ratings
must be job related, with performance standards developed through a job analysis
appeals procedure
appeals procedure should be established to enable employees to express their disagreement with the review
Sources of Performance Review Information
- Manager and/or supervisor review
- Self-evaluation
- Subordinate evaluations
- Peer evaluation
- Team evaluation
- Customer evaluations
Self-evaluation
best used for developmental purposes rather than for administrative decisions
Subordinate evaluations
to avoid any problems with retaliation, subordinate reviews should be submitted anonymously, and the
results of the individuals combined in a single report
Peer evaluation
ratings should be tallied to arrive at a composite score and the comments summarized by the worker’s supervisor
Team evaluation
a performance evaluation that recognizes team
accomplishment rather than individual performance
Customer evaluations
a performance evaluation that includes evaluation from both a firm’s external and internal customers
360-degree evaluation
a performance evaluation
done by different people who interact with the employee, generally on forms compiled into a single profile for use in the evaluation meeting conducted by the employee’s manager
Training Appraisers
-can vastly improve the performance review process
- firms should make accurately evaluating and developing their subordinates a standard by which the supervisors themselves will be evaluated
Error of central tendency (A Distribution Error)
a performance rating error in which all employees are rated about average
Leniency or strictness error
a performance rating error in
which the appraiser tends to give employees either unusually
high or unusually low ratings
Forced distribution
a performance ranking system whereby raters are required to place a certain percentage of employees into various performance categories
Peer ranking
employees in a work group are ranked against
one another from best to worst