ch3: perceiving ourselves and others Flashcards

1
Q

self-concept

A

an individual’s self-beliefs and self-evaluations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

which levels is the self-concept defined at

A

individual (personal traits), relational (connections to friends and coworkers) and collective (other entities)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the three components of an individual self

A

complexity, consistency, clarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

complexity

A

the number of distinct and important roles or identities that people perceive about themselves
 Everyone sees themselves in different roles at various times
 Self-expansion – increasing one’s complexity by seeking out new opportunities and social connections
 Also defined by the separation of different identities – if they’re highly interconnected that might lead to low self-esteem
 Complexity is higher when the multiple identities have a low correlation with one another (distinct spheres of life)
 A particular self-view is usually domain specific – more likely to be activated in some settings than others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

consistency

A

the degree to which the individual’s identities require similar personal attributes
 High consistency – individual’s identities are compatible with one another and with their actual personality traits, values and other attributes
 Low consistency – when some self-views require personal attributes that conflict with attributes required for other self-views + when an individual’s dominant self-concept identities are incompatible with their personal attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

clarity

A

the degree to which a person’s self-concept is clear, confidently defined, and stable
 When someone is confident about who they are, can describe their important identities to others, and provide the same description of themselves across time
 Increases through self-reflection, people who live in other cultures engage in more self-reflection + clearer when a person’s multiple selves have higher consistency (low consistency produces ambiguity about a person’s underlying characteristics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when’s psychological well-being higher

A

among those with distinct multiple selves (complexity), that are well-established (clarity) and require similar personal attributes that are compatible with the individual’s character (consistency)
o Self-concept complexity protects self-esteem when some roles are damaged or threatened
o Self-concept complexity helps people adapt, but too much variation causes internal tension and conflict
- Well-being also increases with self-concept clarity
o Those who’re unsure of their self-views are more easily influenced by others, experience more stress when making decisions, and feel more threatened by social forces that undermine their self-confidence and self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how are employees with complex identities

A

more adaptive decision making and performance – multiple selves generate more diverse experiences and role patterns (can alter their thinking and behaviour to suit new tasks and work environments)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

problem with high complexity

A

complex self-concepts require more effort to maintain and juggle which can be stressful
 Low complexity (define themselves by their work) – better performance due to more investment in skill development, longer hours, more concentration on work, lower absenteeism and turnover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

why does clarity improve performance and why is it bad for it

A

o Less threatened by interpersonal conflict (more constructive problem-solving behaviours)
o High clarity may lead to role inflexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

four selves

A

self-enhancement, self-verification, self-evaluation, social self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

self-enhancement

A
  • People are inherently motivated to perceive themselves and be perceived as competent, attractive, lucky, ethical and important – self-enhancement
  • Individuals tend to rate themselves above average, believe that they have a better than average probability of success, and attribute their successes to personal motivation or ability while blaming the situation for their mistake
    o Ex: 70% of students believe their academic performance is above average, 62% say that they have above-average leadership ability
  • Individuals tend to experience better mental and physical health when they amplify their self-concept + “can-do” attitude
    o Negative side: self-enhancement causes people to overestimate future returns in investment decisions and engage in unsafe behaviour + responsible for executives repeating poor decisions, launching misguided corporate diversification strategies, acquiring excessive corporate debt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

self-verification

A

a person’s inherent motivation to confirm and maintain their existing self-concept
- When a person’s identity as a leader is questioned by others, the leader applies self-verification strategies (making their role performance more visible, adopting a les threatening style of that self-view, directly confronting those who doubt or disagree with their identity as a leader)
- Unlike self-enhancement, self-verification includes seeking feedback that isn’t necessarily flattering
o Do we prefer compliments rather than accurate critique about weaknesses that we readily acknowledge?
- Affects the perceptual processes because employees are more likely to remember information that is consistent with their self-concept and nonconsciously screen out information that seems inconsistent with it
- People with high self-concept clarity will consciously dismiss feedback that contradicts their self-concept
- Employees are motivated to interact with others how affirm their self-views

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

self-evolution

A
  • Defined by self-esteem, self-efficacy, locus of control
  • Self-esteem – the extent to which people like, respect, and are satisfied with themselves
    o People have degrees of self-esteem for each of their various roles – form an overall evaluation of themselves (global self-esteem)
    o High self-esteem – less influenced by others, tend to persist in spite of failure, have higher propensity to think logically
  • Self-efficacy – a person’s belief that they have the ability, motivation, correct role perception, and favorable situation to complete a task successfully
    o High self-efficacy leads to a “can-do” attitude – believe they possess the energy (motivation), ability, clear expectations (role perceptions) and resources (situational factors)
    o Often task specific, but it can also be more generalized
  • Locus of control – a person’s general belief about the amount of control they have over personal life events
    o Internal – believe that life events are caused mainly by their personal characteristics
     More positive self-evaluation + perform better in most employment situations, are more successful in their careers, earn more money, are better suited for leadership positions
     More satisfied with their jobs, cope better in stressful situations, and are more motivated by performance-based reward systems
    o External – events are mainly due to fate, luck, other external factors
    o Most apparent in new situations where their ability to control events is uncertain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the social self

A
  • Two opposing human motives that influence how humans view themselves
  • Motivation to be distinctive and different from other people
    o Personal identity/internal self-concepts – fulfils the need for distinctiveness because it involves defining ourselves by our personality, values, abilities, qualifications, achievements, other personal attributes
  • Motivation for inclusion and assimilation with other people
    o The relational and collective self-concepts fulfil the fundamental need for affiliation – involve both interaction and interdependence with others
    o Social identity or external self-concept
  • Social identity theory – a theory stating that people define themselves by the groups to which they belong or have an emotional attachment
  • One factor that determines importance of memberships – how easily you’re identified as a member of the reference group + your minority status in the group + the group’s status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

perception

A

– the process of receiving information about and making sense of the world around us
o Determining which information to notice, how to categorize this information, how to interpret it within the framework of our existing knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

when does perception begin

A

when environmental stimuli are received through our senses, some things are screened out, the rest are organized and interpreted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

selective attention

A

the process of attending to some information received by our senses and ignoring other information
o Influenced by characteristics of the person or object being perceived (size, intensity, motion, repetition, novelty)
o Characteristics of the perceiver also influence – without the perceiver’s awareness – our brain quickly and nonconsciously assesses whether it’s relevant or irrelevant and then attaches emotional markers (help us store information in memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

confirmation bias

A

the processing of screening our information that is contrary to our values and assumptions, and to more readily accept confirming information
o Pay attention to information that supports that decision, ignore information that questions the wisdom of the decision, and more easily recall the supportive than the opposing information
o Ex: student pilots became unsure of their location – tried to find their true location by relying on less reliable information that was consistent with their assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

categorical thinking

A

organizing people and objects into preconceive categories that are stored in our long-term memory
o People are usually grouped together based on their observable similarity + by their proximity to one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what’s the second perceptual grouping process

A

organizes incoming information – fills out in the missing pieces of the puzzle
o Everyone has a need for cognitive closure -> assumptions about missing information by relying on past images and experiences in those situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

example for a tendency to see patterns in random events

A

incorrectly believe that a sports player or gambler with a string of wins is more likely to win the next time as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

trustworthiness experiment

A

o We make judgements about another individual’s trustworthiness after viewing a facial image for as little as 50ms
o Whether we see a face for a minute or just 200ms our opinion about their trustworthiness stays the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

mental models

A

knowledge structures that we develop to describe, explain, an predict the world around us
o Partly rely on the process of perceptual grouping to make sense of things, fill in the missing pieces (including the causal connection among events)
o Make it difficult to see the world in different ways – block our recognition of new opportunities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

changing mental models

A

– being aware of and frequently questioning them – ask ourselves about the assumptions that we make
o Also working with people from diverse backgrounds

26
Q

stereotyping

A

the process of assigning traits to people based on their membership in a social category
o The assigned characteristics tend to be difficult to observe (personality traits and abilities)

27
Q

explanations for stereotyping

A
  • Stereotyping is a nonconscious “energy-saving” process – simplifies our understanding of the world
    o Easier to remember features of a stereotype than characteristics unique to everyone we meet
  • People have an innate need to understand and anticipate how others will behave – the higher the perceiver’s need for cognitive closure, the higher the reliance on stereotypes
  • Third explanation – motivated by the observer’s need for social identity and self-enhancement
28
Q

categorization

A

the comparison with others begins by categorizing people into distinct groups, see others as a prototypical representative of the group

29
Q

homogenization

A

to simplify the comparison process, we tend to think that people within each group are very similar to one another

30
Q

differentiation

A

assign more favourable characteristics to people in our groups than to people in other groups – motivated by self-enhancement

31
Q

problems with stereotypes

A

inaccurate – more characteristics are distorted and embellished

32
Q

stereotype threat

A

an individual’s concern about confirming a negative stereotype about their group so they end up displaying that stereotype trait
o People anxiously try to avoid conforming the undesirable traits and try to push the negative image from their mind – divert energy and attention + weaken self-efficacy (difficult to be confident in your ability when your group’s stereotype suggests otherwise)

33
Q

stereotype threat experiment

A

women perform worse on math and science tests when sensitized to the belief that women perform worse in these subjects + lower scores when there are few women in the group being tested
o Much higher scores when the gender stereotype isn’t salient
o Observed for women, African Americans and other minority groups, and older people

34
Q

unintentional systemic discrimination experiment

A

science faculty from several research intensive universities – given the application materials of an undergraduate student who was applying for a science lab manager job – half were male applicant, half female applicant
o Much higher ratings for the male applicant and a 4000 dollars higher starting salary

35
Q

intentional discrimination or prejudice

A

hold unfounded negative attitudes + deliberately puts the target person at an unfair disadvantage

36
Q

minorities stats

A

need to submit 50% more job applications to receive the same amount of interviews
o French code of BBR – bleu-blanc-rouge

37
Q

can specialized training programs minimize stereotype activation

A

to some extent, but the process is mostly hardwired in our braincells
o Better to prevent the application of stereotypes and not activation

38
Q

attribution process

A

the perceptual process of deciding whether an observed behaviour or event is caused largely by internal or external factor

39
Q

three attribution rules

A

consistency, distinctiveness, consensus
o Consistency is high for both internal and external attributions (low consistency weakens our confidence about what the source of the problem is)
o Distinctiveness and consensus determine whether the attribution should be internal or external, consistency determines our confidence

40
Q

self-serving bias

A

the tendency to attribute our favourable outcomes to internal factors and our failures to external factors
o We take credit for our successes and blame others or the situation for our mistakes

41
Q

fundamental attribution error

A

the tendency to see the person rather than the situation as the main cause of that person’s behaviour
o Observers can’t easily see the external factors that constrain another person’s behaviour + people like to think that human beings are the prime sources of their behaviours
o Less apparent in Asia and other cultures that encourage people to be mindful of the context of behaviour

42
Q

self-fulfilling prophecy

A

the perceptual process in which our expectations about another person cause that person to act more consistently with those expectations

43
Q

the process of self-fulfilling prophecy

A

o The supervisor forms expectations about the employee’s future behaviour and performance (sometimes inaccurate)
o These expectations influence their behaviour toward employees – high-expectancy employees receive more emotional support through nonverbal cues, more frequent and valuable feedback and reinforcement, more challenging goals, better training, more opportunities to demonstrate good performance
o High-expectancy employee learns more skills + the employee has higher self-efficacy which results in higher motivation and willingness to set more challenging goals
o Employee’s behaviour becomes more consistent with the supervisor’s initial expectations

44
Q

self-fulfilling prophecy - Israeli army

A

told that 1/3 of the incoming trainees had high command potential, 1/3 had normal potential and the rest were unknown
o High-expectancy soldiers performed significantly better by the end of the course

45
Q

when’s self-fulfilling prophecy stronger

A

at the beginning of a relationship + when several people hold the same expectations of the individual + among those with a history of low achievement

46
Q

positive organizational behavior

A

a perspective of organizational behaviour that focuses on building positive qualities and traits within individuals or institutions as opposed to focusing on what’s wrong with them

47
Q

training programs for self-fulfilling prophecy

A
  • Training programs that make leaders aware of the power of positive expectations – minimal effect
    o Hiring supervisors who’re inherently optimistic – increasing the positive self-fulfiling prophecy
48
Q

halo effect

A

a perceptual error whereby our general impression of a person, usually based on one prominent characteristic, colours our perception of other characteristics of that person
o Most likely to occur when important information about the perceived target is missing or we’re not sufficiently motivated to search for it

49
Q

false-consensus effect

A

a perceptual error in which we overestimate the extent to which others have beliefs and characteristics similar to our own
o Reasons: comforted by the belief that others are similar to us (especially with regard to less acceptable or divisive behaviour), we interact more with people who have similar views and behaviours, we’re more likely to notice and remember information that is consistent with our own views, we engage in the process of homogenizing people within groups

50
Q

recency effect

A

a perceptual error in which the most recent information dominates our perception of others
o Most common when people make a decision involving complex information

51
Q

primacy effect

A

a perceptual error in which we quickly form an opinion of people based on the first information we receive about them

52
Q

awareness of perceptual bias training

A
  • Diversity awareness training – making people aware of systemic discrimination and prejudices + dispel myths about people from various cultural and demographic groups
    o Only has a limited effect – teaching people to reject incorrect stereotypes has the unintended effect of reinforcing rather than reducing reliance on those stereotypes
    o Ineffective for people with deeply held prejudices against those groups
53
Q

Johari window

A

a model of mutual understanding that encourages disclosure and feedback to increase our own open area and reduce the blind, hidden and unknown areas
o Open – known both to you and others
o Blind – known to others but not to you
o Hidden – known to you but not to others
o Unknown – nobody knows them

54
Q

Johari window - increasing the size of the open area

A

o Disclosure – informing others of your beliefs, feelings, experiences that may influence the work relationships
o Feedback from others about your behaviour – reduces your blind area
contact hypothesis

55
Q

contact hypothesis

A

the more we interact with someone, the less prejudiced or perceptually biased we will be against that person

56
Q

when are meaningful interactions the strongest

A

when people work closely and frequently with one another on a shared goal that requires mutual cooperation and reliance
o Reduces dependence on stereotypes – diminishes psychological distance, improves our knowledge about individuals, helps us to observe their unique attributes in action

57
Q

empathy

A

understanding and being sensitive to the feelings, thoughts and situations of others
o Empathize when they visualize themselves in other person’s place – cognitive, emotional, experiential
o Improves our sensitivity to the external causes of another person’s performance and behaviour

58
Q

global mindset

A

an individuals’ ability to perceive, appreciate, and empathize with people from other cultures, and to process complex cross-cultural information

59
Q

four elements of the global mindset

A

o Adopting a global perspective – global rather than a local frame of reference about their business and its environment – accumulating knowledge and appreciation of many cultures without judging the competence of others by their nationality
o Empathizing and acting effectively across cultures
o Processing complex information about novel environments
o Developing new multilevel mental models

60
Q

what are people with a global mindset good at

A
  • Form better relationships across cultures by understanding and showing respect + can sift through ambiguous and novel information + capacity to form networks and exchange resources more rapidly
61
Q

how does the global mindset begin

A

with self-awareness -> more open minded and non-judgemental when receiving and processing complex information