changing character of war Flashcards
(52 cards)
what are the 3 new challenges in the world?
- geopolitical (multipolarity/ great power politics)
- political (new populism/inequality)
- technological (drones, cyber, A.I)
how does the state perceive new threats?
the modern state looks to the future to ensure long term security. looks at long term threats, next 10, 50, 100 years
what is a black swan event?
an event that takes you by surprise and has a big shock factor e.g 9/11
what was the problem faced by the US in the 1990s in relation to power?
the US was the only superpower and the power that comes with that, all that power can lead to overstepping and making mistakes
what is the scarface theory of IR?
what have we misunderstood about th world, in terms of international relations, realists have alerted us to these mistakes by overusing our supply of power
what is the world of power games?
creating short term marriages of convenience, frenemies. e.g osama bin Ladin was considered hero for fighting soviets in the 1980s but then planned 9/11 attacks, allies can change
what was considered the end of history?
post Cold War 1990s, period of globalisation, deterrence by entanglement and end of superpower rivalry, a world of liberal peace and new world order
what is deterrence by entanglement?
the idea we are so interconnected that wars will not happen due to entanglement of economy and society
how was 9/11 significant in nature of threats?
the attack was carried out by a non-state actor and was black swan event, attack used as media spectacle
what was the consequence of 9/11 on the west’s outlook on conflict?
the west then entered into wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and further relentless wars which ultimately resulted in the emergence of new threats such as ISIS
what was the neoliberal response to foreign policy after 9/11?
US should spread liberal democracy through military force and we must act pre-emptively to survive and demonstrate power
what are the different types of deterrence?
deterrence by punishment: you will inflict a cost
deterrence by denial: you will deter actor because what they want to do won’t work
what are peer competitors?
those actors close to your power level and so wouldn’t wage direct war on a peer competitor as it is not easily won
what are near peer competitors?
those who are not seen as close your power level.
how was war in Iraq neither peer or near peer?
it was seen as neither as the US is so powerful compared to Iraq it was war that could be easily won
how has great power politics changed in relation to war?
war is now too dangerous to wage as stakes are too high, the great power politics has become about deterring your enemies
what is ‘war is peace’?
the threat of apocalypse from WMDs has worked so far, but this talks about states and nuclear weapons, not small state and non-state actors
how is deterrence not as effective against terrorism?
terrorist groups won’t be deterred the same way as states, as they have less at stake and are more fluid in structure
how is deterrence not as effective against terrorism?
terrorist groups won’t be deterred the same way as states, as they have less at stake and are more fluid in structure
how has terror changed the way we see future threats?
the new creativity of terror through exploiting of vulnerabilities in open networked societies, the new challenge is to find the black swan event
how can future terror threats be treated?
is it policing the operation, they can’t be deterred the same way as states, is there a need to act preemptively and destroy the threat before it can happen
what was the neoconservative view on tackling future threats?
America needs to deal with forces domestically that are weakening the state and need to maintain their position in the world, not giving into new ideas such as climate change and international organisations
what do realists see as the problem in danger of power politics?
the danger in American politics is in uni-polarity there is no deterrence against the power,
what do realists say the consequence of uni-polar power?
the problem of policymakers living in worlds of fantasy and overestimate their own power and leading to underestimation of the enemy. it makes us blind to the messiness on the ground