Chapter 1 Flashcards

(52 cards)

1
Q

According to Pinker what is the decline of violence?

A

fractal phenomenon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PInker: 4 explanations why violence has declined.

A
  1. Anarchy (invade your neighbors before they invade you)
  2. Life was seen as “cheap”
  3. Non-Zero Sum game. “non-violence benefits both parties.”
  4. Circle “we now have empathy”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What 4 concepts are related to violence and aggression?

A
  1. Elusive 2. Ubiquitious 3. Transforming 4. Thrilling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Buss Definition 1961

A

Aggression is a response that delivers noxious stimuli to another organism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dollard

A

Aggression…is an act whose goal response is injury to an organism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does goal response mean?

A

Motivation and striving (intent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dollard 1939

A

Accidents are NOT aggression because there is no goal response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Baron and Richardson

A

Aggression in any form of behavior direct towards the goal of harming or injuring another living being who is motivated to avoid such treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cambridge Dictionary Definition of aggression

A

Spoken or physical behavior which is threatening or involving harm to someone or something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aggressive (non-negative)

A

Being determined to win or succeed and using strong methods to achieve victory or success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Working definiton of aggression

A

Aggression is the delivery or an aversive stimulus from one person to another with intent to harm and with an expectation of causing such harm, when the other person is motivated to escape or avoid stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Forms of aggression:

A

Gossip, Damaging property, social snub

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

**It is customary to classify aggressive behavior into two categories.

A
  1. affective aggression 2. instrumental aggression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Affective aggression

A

in which harming the victim is the main motive for the action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Instrumental aggression

A

– which may or may not involve strong emotions but it is motivated by concerns more important to the aggressor than harm doing itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Delayed response

A

state of impulse, it disposes the person to action, it is often accompanied by bodily arousal. – It can be preoccupation that takes attention away from other matters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Reactive aggression

A

aggressive behavior that is enacted in response to provocation, such as attack or an insult its manifested in both self-defense and angry reactions (Crick & Dodge 1996)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Proactive aggression

A

aggression that is initiated without apparent provocation, not evoked by anger, hostility, or the needs to defend oneself. Motive – Obtaining goods, asserting power, assuming the approval of reference groups and other goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Lorenz’s definition of aggression

A

Behavior triggers by specific external stimuli following a progressive accumulation of aggression specific energy within the person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Three types of research methods

A
  1. Observation
  2. Correlation
  3. Experimental
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Outcomes

A

Likely hood of aggression being rewarded

22
Q

Self-effacy

A

If reinforced child also develops a sense of confidence in his or her ability to execute the necessary aggressive behaviors

23
Q

Cerebral Cortex

A

(important part in aggression as a cognitive processes in relation of provocation and aggression.

24
Q

organizing effects

A

Influence the bodily development and structure and function of the nervous system in the fetus prior to birth

25
Activating effects
CAN CAUSE CHANGES IN THE MOODS AND behaviors of animals after birth, outcomes that are called
26
A definition of aggression was presented that focuses on three aspects
namely harmful consequences, intention and expectancy of inflicting harm, and desire by the target person to avoid the harmful treatment.
27
Intention
inflicting harm on the target,
28
Anticipation
that the action will produce a particular outcome.
29
Baron and Richardson (1994) has three important implications:
Aggressive behaviour is characterised by its underlying motivation (to harm or injure another living being), not by its consequences (whether or not harm or injury actually occurs). A necessary feature of the intention to harm is the actor’s understanding that the behaviour in question has the potential to cause harm or injury to the target. Defining aggression as behaviour that the target would want to avoid means that actions that may cause harm but which are performed with the target’s consent, such as painful medical treatment, do not represent instances of aggression.
30
Direct aggression
Direct aggression involves a face-to-face confrontation between the aggressor and the target,
31
Indirect aggression
aimed at harming other people behind their back by spreading rumours about them or otherwise damaging their peer relationships
32
Hostile
primary motive for aggressive behaviour may be either the desire to harm another person as an expression of negative feelings
33
Instrumental
aim of achieving an intended goal by means of the aggressive act,
34
Coersion
is defined by Tedeschi and Felson (1994, p. 168) as “an action taken with the intention of imposing harm on another person or forcing compliance.”
35
Violence
intention of causing serious harm that involve the use or threat of physical force,
36
physical force
such as hitting someone over the head, or – in the ultimate form – taking another person’s life.
37
Geen/ Archer definition of violence
“the infliction of intense force upon persons or property for the purposes of destruction, punishment, or control” (Geen, 1995, p. 669), or as “physically damaging assaults which are not socially legitimised in any way” (Archer & Browne, 1989, p. 11).
38
6 functions of violent behavior
(1) change of, or escape from, aversive situations; (2) positive reinforcement (i.e., attainment of a particular goal); (3) release of negative affective arousal; (4) resolution of conflict; (5) gaining of respect; and (6) attack on a culturally defined “enemy,” (i.e., a member of a devalued out-group).
39
Structural violence
is seen as a latent feature of social systems that leads to social inequality and injustice
40
measurement reactivity
(i.e., people’s tendency to change their usual patterns of behaviour because they are aware that they are under observation).
41
Observational measures in natural contexts mainly come in two forms:
Naturalistic observation and field experience
42
Naturalistic observation
which the researcher records behaviour as it unfolds naturally without manipulating the situation in any way,
43
Field experience
systematic yet unobtrusive manipulation of certain variables to observe the effects of that manipulation on the likelihood of aggressive behaviour.
44
laboratory experiments. In this setting, situations can be created by the investigator to meet three essential criteria:
1. that respondents are exposed to an experimental manipulation aimed at influencing their aggressive response tendencies 2.that they can be randomly assigned to the experimental and control conditions 3 that many factors which might influence participants’ behaviour over and above the experimental treatment can be controlled.
45
Goal direction
reactive (hostile) proactive (instrumental)
46
response quality
action vs failure to act
47
immediacy
direct vs indirect
48
visibility
overt vs covert
49
instigation
unprovoked vs retaliative
50
Types of damage
psysical vs psychological
51
duration of effects
trasient vs long term
52
social units involved
individual vs groups