Chapter 1 Flashcards
(26 cards)
Financial accounting
given specific transactions or events –> determine how they should be recorded and appear in the F/S
- quantitative
- concrete “right” answer
- rules
Auditing (as opposed to financial accounting)
given a set of F/S –> check for conformity with GAAP
- ask “how should we test in order to figure that out?
- less quantitative, more conceptual
- focus on analytical and logical skills
- backing into things after the fact
agency problem
Public companies, owned by thousands of shareholders, hire managers to serve as agents for the owners and manage the co’s assets.
- conflict of interest? Manager may not always act in the best interest of owner
- info. asymmetry and info. risk
- users depend on accurate/reliable information to make decisions
- management needs to be monitored
auditing origins
occurred during the industrial revolution, when companies became larger and needed to raise capital to finance expansion. A capital market was formed, allowing public companies to sell ownership/borrow to raise funds.
information asymmetry
seller has more information than the buyer (leads to information risk)
information risk
risk that information circulated by management will be false of misleading
House inspector analogy
Similar to audit context - people want to make sure a house is safe before they buy it just as investors want to know they have accurate information about a company before the invest
Major difference from audit context - house inspector is paid for by the buyer. In audit context, the co. selects and pays the auditor
management responsibilities
- maintaining internal controls
- preparing F/S
- management asserts that the F/S are “right” (fairly stated in accordance with GAAP)
auditor responsibilities
- testing assertions of management and determining whether they are true
- rendering an opinion on the F/S
desired characteristics of auditor
competitence, objective, honest, skeptical, responisble
desirable traits of audit service
timely, reasonably priced, complete, effective, systematic, informative
____ + _____ = information risk
information asymmetry and conflict of interest
assurance services
independent (third party) professional services that improve the quality of information , or its context, for decision makers (they provide info to buyers to help them make decisions
-attest and audit are special types of assurance services
audit
systematic process that objectively searches for and evaluates the relevance and validity of evidence and communicate results to interested users
skepticism
questioning (the client); don’t accept everything at face value
-especially important for new hires because new hires think others are more experienced and they’re afraid they might look stupid for asking questions
materiality
mistakes big enough to matter to interested users
audit risk
auditors don’t look at 100% of the evidence for the sake of time so there is risk that something they missed is wrong
sampling
take a sample and project findings out to represent the whole population of information
evidence
data and documents used to form opinions about the sample (ie ledgers)
management assertions
management asserts that the F/S are “correct” (conform with GAAP)
- auditor’s job to test that assertion
- “correct” = general concept because there are multiple ways F/S can end up not “correct” (5 typical ways/5 things to test)
Ways the F/S could fail “to be correct”
- omit something that should be included
- include something that does not belong (fictitious or not legitimate) (ex: adding inventory that isn’t actually there)
- include items that belong to someone else (ex: goods on consignment)
- items are not adequately presented/disclosed according to gaap (ex: cost flow of inventory does not conform with gaap)
- include items in the wrong period, at the wrong dollar amount or using the wrong valuation (fob shipping point error, inconsistencies of fifo vs lifo)
Ways the F/S fail “to be correct” terminology
- Existence assertion
- Rights and Obligation assertion
- Presentation and Disclosure assertion
- Completeness assertion
- Valuation allocation assertion
PCAOB for management assertions
AS No. 1105
valuation or allocation assertion consists of (subcomponents)
accuracy - includes math, positing and tie-in, authorization
cut-off - refers to timing (will always have completeness problem too)
classification - often mean presentation issues too
valuation/realizable value - amount amount you actually expect to receive/collect