Chapter 1 - Roots of Commutative Algebra Flashcards
(54 cards)
Discuss number theory motivations for commutative algebra
Rings of integers
- Z
- Z[i] integers of quadratic number field
- Z[zeta] integers of cyclotomic field
Question: Is this ring a UFD?
Commutative Algebra: Picard Group Pic(R) - invariant measuring how far from UFD
Much of this early development was motivated by the search for a proof of Fermat’s last theorem. Adjoining a root of unity to Z, we can factor x^n + y^n = z^n and arrive at product_i (x - zeta^(2i+1)y) = z^n. If the ring Z[zeta] is a UFD, we are essentially done. Unfortunetly, Z[zeta] is rarely a UFD. Search for generalization of UFD
- Facorization of ideals into prime ideals in Dedekind domains
- Primary decomposition
Discuss algebraic geometry motivations for commutative algebra
Coordinate rings
- generated by coordinate functions
1. k[x,y] - ring generated by coordinate functions on k^2
2. k[x,y] /(y^2 - x^3 +x) coordinate ring of eliptic curve
Question: How are points of curve related to coordinate ring?
Commutative Algebra: points <=> maximal ideals
Discuss invariant theory motivations for commutative algebra
Invariant Rings
Consider action of icosahedron on R^3 - group of order 120. Action on R^3 yields an action on R[x,y,z]
Invariants = polynomials fixed by symmetries
Obvious: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = a
Two other of degree 8 and 10.
Question: Is invariant ring finitely generated?
Commutative Algebra: Hilbert’s Basis Theorem - yes for G reductive
In the 1830s, people became interested in the geometric properties of plane curves invariant under certain classes of transformations. Give a sort of function that associates to a geometric configuration, a number that is invariant under group action. The functions studied were mostly polynomial functions of quantities defining the geometric objects - such as the coefficients of the equations of algebraic plane curves.
Central problem: Given a “nice” action of a group G as automorphisms of a polynomial ring S, find the elements of S that are left invariant by G.
Define: ring, module
Set with two operations: + *. Abelian group under +, commutative with identity
Module over a ring is like a vector space over a field - more flexible than ideals
abelian group + scalar multiplication by elements of ring
Examples of non-commutative rings?
- Matrix rings
- Quaternions
- Group rings
- Rings of differential operators
- Non-commutative polynomial rings
- Universal Enveloping Algebra of Lie Algebra
Discuss constructions which turn out to be special cases of modules
- Z-modules = abelian groups
- k-module = vector space
- k[x]-module = linear transformation
- Submodule of R = ideal
- R/I as R-module = quotient ring
- k[G]-modules = representation theory
How does a group G act on polynomials?
Given an action of G on spaces X and Y, get an action of G on the ring of functions f:X –> Y given by (gf)(x) = gf(g^-1 x)
Discuss the invariant ring of S_n acting on k[x1, … , xn]
Elementary symmetric polynomials
e_1 = x_1 + x_2 + … + x_n
e_2 = x_1x_2 + x_1x_3 + …
(y-x_1)(y-x_2)…(y-x_n) = y^n - e_1y^n-1 + e_2y^n-2 - …
Thm. Every invariant polynomial in x_1, …, x_n is a polynomial in e_1, … , e_n
Borcherds pg 18 - 20 Eisenbud e1.7
Discuss ring of invariants of A_n acting on k[x1, … , xn]
Define A_n as the subgroup fixing Vandermonde determinant. Then clear that invariants of A_n = elementary symmetric polynomials plus VD
Have first order Syzygy
Borcherds 20 - 21
Discuss the invariants of Z/3Z acting on C^2
Generated by homogeneous degree 3 polynomials
1st and 2nd order syzygies
B 22
What are the key questions about ring of invariants? Answers?
- Is ring of invariants R fg as k-Algebra?
- Are syzygy modules fg as R-module?
- Is chain of modules finite? - finite free resolution
Hilbert: Yes if G is reductive k char 0
Example of ideal that is not f.g?
k[x1….] ideal of all polys with constant term 0
Example of f.g. module over Noetherian ring without finite free resolution?
R = k[x] / (x^2) M = R / (x) = k
B 32
Discuss 3 equivalent definitions of Noetherian rings and prove equivalence
- All ideals are f.g.
- A.c.c
- Every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal element
B33-34
Example of non-Noetherian ring and failure of conditions
k[x1, x2, …]
- (x1, x2, x3, …) not f.g.
- (x1) < (x1, x2) < (x1, x2, x3) < … no acc
- {(x1), (x1, x2), (x1, x2, x3), … } no maximal element
Define: Artinian ring and give nonexample
- d.c.c.
- Every set of ideals has a minimal element
Much stronger than Noetherian
Z is non-Artinian
(2) > (4) > (8) > (16) > …
Give sequence of examples of Noetherian/non-Noetherian rings
R[x] polynomials –> Analytic functions on R –> Analytic on [-1,1] –> Analytic on (-1, 1) –> Analytic at 0 –> Smooth near 0 –> Formal Power Series
In Noetherian rings, zeros are very well behaved. Finite order. Can control them
B36
Is a subring of a Noetherian ring Noetherian?
No
- Analytic functions < Formal power series
- R a non-Noetherian integral domain < Q field of quotients
Discuss how quotient rings behave with Noetherian property
If R is Noetherian, so is any quotient R/I. Ideals of R/I <=> Ideals of R containing I
What is Hilbert basis theorem? Noether Proof? Gordan Proof?
Corollaries?
Thm. If R is Noetherian, then R[x] is Noetherian.
Pf. (Noether) Suppose I is an ideal of R[x]. Look at ideals I0 < I1 < … where Ik is ideal of leading coefficients of degree k elements. Since R Noetherian, chain stabilizes at some In.
S0, S1, … Sn, where Sk is finite set of polys in I of degree k whose leading coefficients generate Ik.
The union of these finite sets generates I
B40-41
Pf. (Gordan)
- Dickson’s Lemma. If S is any set of monomials, it has only a finite number of minimal elements (ordered by divisibility)
- Now look at ideal I < k[x1, … , xn]. Order monomials lexicographically. Look at set of leading terms of polys in I. This is a subset of monomials. It has finite number of min elements. Pick a polynomial for each min element. These generate I.
Corollary 1.3. Any homomorphic image of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian. If S is Noetherian and R is a f.g. algebra over S, then R is Noetherian pg 28
Prove R[[x]] is Noetherian if R is Noetherian
This is essentially Hilbert basis theorem for formal power series.
Now we can’t look at leading coefficients since no largest elements. Instead, look at smallest term of power series.
B43-44
If G is a group acting on a vector space, when do we know the algebra of invariants is finitely generated?
Proof?
Compact groups? Noncompact?
- We need G reductive
- We need V finite dimensional
- We need base field k to have characteristic 0
Say dim V = n. The algebra of all polys is k[x1, … , xn] which is graded by degree.
The key property of ring of invaraints has allowing this is RENOLDS OPERATOR - a homomorphism of I-modules from R –> I. Retraction onto I. Splits s.e.s.
B46-51
pg 31
Define: Noetherian module
A module M over some ring R is called Noetherian if one of the following hold
- Submodules are finitely generated
- Every nonempty set of submodules has a maximal element
- Every increasing chain M1 < M2 < … terminates acc
Note: R is Noetherian as a ring <=> R is Noetherian. as R-module.
Submodules = Ideals
Prove: Given a s.e.s. of R-modules 0 –> A –> B —> C —> 0, B is Noetherian <=> A and C are Noetherian.
Corollaries?
=> Easy. Recognize submodules of A and C as submodules of B.
<= Let M be submodule of B. Show M finitely generated. Im M in C is fg and Im A in M is f.g.
Special Case: A,B Noetherian => A (+) B Noetherian.
Even more special: R^n Noetherian if R Noetherian ring
Cor. Any fg module M over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian.
pg 28
Pf. R^n is Noetherian by above. M f.g. implies we have a map R^n –> M –> 0 so M is a quotient of Noetherian => Noetherian.
B52-53
Exercise 3