Chapter 10-11: Aggression & Prejudice Flashcards
Two types of aggression
Hostile aggression
Stems from anger and is aimed at inflicting pain
Instrumental aggression
Means to some goal other then causing pain
Ie aggression to get ahead
Cultural differences:
Culture of honor
Southern males supposedly have a heightened sense of masculinity, and react aggressively when it is threatened.
Cohen 1996
Males from south who were bumped into and threatened had heightened levels of cortisol and testosterone. They also walked further into a threatening game of chicken.
Gender differences in aggression:
Men are more physically aggressive
Women are more relationally aggressive
-gossip, backstabbing rumors etc
Bettencourt 1996:
Men are more aggressive but: The gender difference dissolves when either gender is threatened.
Rewards for aggression
Positive reinforcement
It gets you things you want
Negative reinforcement
Stops bad things from happening
Using aggression to discourage something
Reducing aggression by punishment
Reducing by Punishments
Can be effective under certain circumstances
Must:
- Immediately follow behavior
- be strong enough to deter aggressor
- Consistently applied and seen as fair/legitimate
However
- May provoke retaliation
- provides model to imitate
Social learning theory and experiment
Social learning theory
People learn social behavior by observing others and imitating them
Children imitate aggression in degree and kind (bandura, 1961)
- Experimenters beat up a bobo doll
- Kids would match that behavior in degree and kind, and not in control
Media exposure
Effects and study
Violent TV (short and long term) Correlational study shows positive correlation in the short term violence and the long term violence
Violent video games and music
(Anderson & dill, 2000)
People played violent or nonviolent video game/music
Then they delivered noise blasts to others
Participants who played violent games sent much longer times
How does media exposure increase aggressions?
Five ways
Weakened inhibitions via social influence
-When you see other people engaging in aggressive behaviors it tells
you it’s ok, others do it, so your inhibitions are chipped away
Imitation, ie social learning theory
-You see others doing it so you imitate
Priming anger appraisals
-When you encounter or engage in aggression it primes aggression to
make it more accessible
Habituation to violence
-We see it all the time and so we get used to it.
Increasing defensiveness
-You perceive the world as a dangerous violent place, and are violent
Frustration aggression hypothesis
Frustration aggression hypothesis
Frustration occurs when you’re being blocked from being able to attain a goal, it increases likelihood of a aggression
Interrupting progress toward goal leads to frustration leads to aggressiveness
Claims all aggression is caused by frustration
Catharsis and experiment
Catharsis: letting out anger makes you feel better
This is wrong, evidence against
Green 1975
Participants were shocked by a confederate. They were either aggressively shocked or lightly shocked, supposedly the aggression would create a need for catharsis. In the second part, the confederate was shocked by no one, an experimenter, or the participant. If catharsis, the participant should shock less if they’ve already had chance to shock. However, those who got to shock already shocked more instead of less, knocking down catharsis, pushing that violence perpetuates violence
Engaging in aggression increases future aggression likelihood. Creates aggression reward chain.
Negative affect
When you don’t feel good you’re more aggressive
Eg:
People are more aggressive in heat
-murders rapes up
-baseball batters hit
Provocation and humor
Baron & ball
Yes it leads to aggression but humor can neutralize the situation
Participant was attacked like first study
Then they were supposed to rate cartoons or neutral pics
Dependent was average shocks
Provocation lead to higher shocks only with neutral participants, funny ones had no difference
Associated cues
Associated cues
Just the presence of guns or accessibility of them increases aggression
Berkowitz and lepage 1968
Subjects were angered or not
There were either actual guns on the table or badminton rackets or nothing
Dependent was how much participant shocks
Increase on aggression with guns
Prejudice- ________ component
Prejudice- affective component
Hostile or negative attitude based solely on group membership
Persists despite evidence to the contrary
Implicit v explicit attitudes
Implicit attitudes
- Automatic,
- uncontrollable,
- involuntary,
- unconscious
Explicit attitudes
Consciously endorse or verbally agree to
In American culture the structure of prejudice has shifted to a decrease of explicit prejudice values yet implicit attitudes still lie there
Stereotype: ________ component
Stereotype: cognitive component
Geteneraoizealtion of a group of people where certain traits are assigned to all members
Ignoring individuability of members
Seeing people less of person more as group member
Cognitive ______
Confirmation bias
Cognitive misers”
people tend to spend as little effort as they can resulting in stereotypes
Confirmation bias-
when we see someone act in these stereotypes if confirms it but we ignore when they act against
Discrimination: _______ component
Micro aggression
Discrimination- behavioral component
Negative harmful action toward member of a group solely because group membership
Microaggressions- not intended to be hostile small ways we act different
Talking down to women
Telling Asian his English is good
Three parts and components:
Prejudice
-Affective, how we feel
Stereotypes
-Cognitive, how we think
Discrimination
-Behavioral, how we act
Scapegoating and displacement
When frustrated taking it out on safe targets and displace aggression on them
Reaction formation
Reaction formation
Reduces unacceptable feelings you’re uncomfortable with so you’re uncomfortable with
Eg:
Homophobia is associated with homosexual arousal
The most homophobic were the most attracted to gay porn
Economic theory of discrimination
Economics
Group conflict stems from competition over limited resource
Eg:
Robbers cave experiment
Inter group conflict arose immediately when competition was introduced
Super-ordinate goals (goals above each group) reduced inter group conflict
Motivational hypothesis of discrimination
Minimal groups paradigm
Motivational
Inter group hostility can develop in the absence of competition
Minimal groups paradigm
Hostility arises even in dumb meaningless groups with no competition, shown in underestimator overestimator experiment
Social identity theory and study
Social identity theory
Self concept and self esteem derive from status and accomplish from groups
Boost status of in groups, boosts own self esteem (BURGing)
Can derogating out group members boost ones self esteem?
(Fein, 1997) eg are people motivated to discriminate out group to boost ones self esteem
People took an exam, those who had self esteem hurt by gold they did badly released racism against Jews when rating profiles, actively making themselves feel better