Chapter 10- Jury Flashcards
Challenge for Cause
A challenge of a prospective juror before a trial begins, a legitimate reason must be given to the court.
Disqualified Jurors
People who are prohibited from being on a jury because of something they have done in the past that makes them not suitable. E.g can be having a criminal record.
Excused Jurors
People who have been granted permission to not attend jury service by the Juries Commissioner
Foreperson
A member of a jury who has been elected by the other members of that jury as the spokesperson for the jury
Hung jury
A jury that cannot reach a verdict
Ineligible jurors:
people who are not eligible for jury service because of their inability to comprehend a task or because of their occupation, such as Lawyers, Police officers etc
Jury:
An independent group of people summoned to a court and empanelled to decide on the evidence in a case and reach a verdict
Majority Verdict:
A majority verdict in criminal cases is 11 out of 12 jurors. A majority verdict in civil cases is 5 out of 6
Peremptory Challenge:
A challenge of a prospective juror before a trial begins, no reason needs to be given.
Unanimous Verdict:
A verdict of all the jury
Role of the Jury:
Be the decider of the facts of the case, they make a decision on which facts they believe to be true.
Also need to:
Listen to all evidence, understand all evidence, form an opinion on which party is right, or whether the accused is guilty or not guilty.
Advantage for Reason to be given for the decision:
- Jurors would be more likely to follow the law if they had to give a reason for their decision.
- the parties would know whether the law was followed
- the accused would know whether the reasons were reasonable.
- juries may be less likely to discriminate against the accused on inappropriate grounds
Disadvantages for reason to be given for the Decision:
- Juries would have to make decisions that strictly follow the law rather than be free to make decisions in line with community thinking.
- could result in more appeals because the reasons given may seem unreasonable.
Criminal Trial:
- Decision by the jury must be beyond reasonable doubt
- jury must try and reach a unanimous verdict, but if that is not possible after six hours, a majority verdict can be accepted.
Civil Trial:
- Jury must make a decision on the balance of probabilities; that is which party is most in the right and which party is most in the wrong.
- Decision can be majority decision (5/6) if they are unable to reach a unanimous decision after at least three hours of deliberation.
- Jury also has to decide on the amount of damages to be paid to the plaintiff if the plaintiff is successful and damages are sought.