Chapter 13: Genuineness of Asset and Undue Influence Flashcards
(23 cards)
genuineness of assent (situations where missing)
the requirement that a party’s assent to a contract be genuine (mistake, fraudulent misrepresentation, duress)
rescission
an action to undo a contract
unilateral mistake (rescind-able?)
a mistake in which only one party is mistaken about a material fact regarding the subject matter of a contract (not in most cases)
three types of situations in which a contract may not be enforced due to a unilateral mistake
- One party makes a unilateral mistake of fact, and the other party knew (or should have known) that a mistake was made.
- A unilateral mistake occurs because of a clerical/mathematical error that is not the result of gross negligence
- The mistake is so serious that enforcing the contract would be unconscionable
mutual mistake of a material fact (rescind-able?)
a mistake made by both parties concerning a material fact that is important to the subject matter of a contract (yes on the grounds that there was never a contract such as ambiguity)
mutual mistake of value (rescind-able?)
a mistake that occurs if both parties know the object of the contract but are mistaken as to its value (no- almost all contract would then rescind by the party who got the bad end of the deal)
fraudulent misrepresentation (fraud)
an event that occurs when one person consciously decides to induce another person to rely and act on a misrepresentation
the four elements needed in order to prove fraud
- the wrongdoer made a false representation of material fact
- the wrongdoer intended to deceive the innocent party
- the innocent party justifiably relied on the misrepresentation
- the innocent party was injured
actionable/non-actionable factors of misrepresentation of a material fact
actionable: the misrepresentation must be of a past or existing material fact that was a significant factor in inducing the innocent party to enter into the contract; may occur by written or spoken words, or by the conduct of the parties
non-actionable: statements of opinion or predictions about the future
scienter (“guilty mind”)
knowledge that a representation is false or that it was made without sufficient knowledge of the truth
actionable factors for intent to deceive
accused must have acted with scienter and with intent to deceive the innocent party (intent can be inferred from the circumstances)
reliance on a misrepresentation (exclusions)
an innocent party who acts must justify his or her reliance (justifiable reliance is generally found unless the innocent party knew that the misrepresentation was false or was so extravagant as to be obviously false)
economic injury measures (alternative)
the measure of damages is the difference between the value of the property as represented and the actual value of the property in order to give the innocent party the benefit of the bargain (or the buyer can rescind the contract and recover the purchase price)
fraud in the inception (void/voidable?)
fraud that occurs if a person is deceived as to the nature of his act and does not know what he is signing (such contracts are void)
fraud in the inducement (void/voidable?)
fraud that occurs when the party knows what he is signing but has been fraudulently induced to enter into the contract (such contracts are voidable by the innocent party)
fraud by concealment
fraud that occurs when one party takes specific action to conceal a material fact from another party
three situations where silence is misrepresentation
- non-disclosure would cause bodily injury or death
- there is a fiduciary relationship between the contracting parties
- federal and state statutes require disclosure
Restatement (Second) of Contracts’ duty of disclosure
Nondisclosure is a misrepresentation if it would constitute a failure to act in “good faith”
non-actionable/actionable factors of misrepresentation of law
non-actionable: the innocent party cannot generally rescind the contract because each party to a contract is assumed to know the law that applies to the transaction, either through his own investigation or by hiring an attorney
actionable: if one party to the contract is a professional who should know what the law is and intentionally misrepresents the law to a less sophisticated contracted party
innocent misrepresentation (consequences)
fraud that occurs when a person makes a statement of fact that he honestly and reasonably believes to be true even though it is not (not truly fraud- aggrieved party may rescind the contract but may not sue for damages; often treated as a mutual mistake)
duress (enforceable?)
a situation in which one party threatens to do a wrongful act unless the other party enters into a contract (such contract is not enforceable against the innocent party because the assent is not voluntary)
equitable doctrine: undue influence
a situation in which one person takes advantage of another person’s mental, emotional, or physical weakness and unduly persuades that person to enter into a contract; the persuasion by the wrongdoer must overcome the free will of the innocent party
two elements in order to prove undue influence (and one situation where presumed)
- a fiduciary or confidential relationship must have existed between the parties
- the dominant party must have unduly used his influence to persuade the servient party to enter into a contract
OR
any contract between dr/patient or lawyer/client is presumed to be entered into under undue influence (can be overcome through proper evidence)