Chapter 14 Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

randomized experiment

A

Assigning a group randomly to the control or experimental group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

placebo

A

Control group receives
Inert or ineffective treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

experimental subject/unit

A

Units randomized to control or experimental group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

random assignment

A

Used to provide or withhold an intervention or treatment following a procedure to flipping a coin
Researcher must randomize assignment of the IV
Participants randomly assigned to treatment and control groups
Helps ensure all groups are identical on all z variables
Have random assignment but not random sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

statistical equivalence

A

Balances the treatment and control groups in terms of both measured and unmeasured variables with bounds of chance as differences
Experiments are the “gold standard” for getting close to causality
Note: we still can’t observe causation here. The book does a bad job of explaining this
But, out of all the research designs we have, it the design that generally gives us the most confidence in arguing for cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

haphazard randomization

A

Less formal procedure that mimics true random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why random assignment?

A

Statistical equivalence on all variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

randomized experiment

A

Seeks to isolate the causal relationship between one explanatory variable, the treatment (x) and one or more response variables or outcomes (y)
Treatment → outcome or x → y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

exogenous

A

X, the treatment is known to independent from and uncorrelated with all the other variables causing y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

experiments have what kind of internal and external validity

A

high internal low external

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

internal validity

A

Confidence that the effect of X on Y is real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

external validity

A

Confidence that relationship between X and Y generalized beyond experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

threats to internal validity

A

Internal - differences between participants in treatment and control groups (other than X)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

selection

A

Individuals selected into treatment are different from those in control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

experiment mortality

A

Ppl. turning out and not receiving treatment
Only threat if creates difference between treatment and control group so if don’t mess up random assignment should be no threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

threats to external validity

A

any differences between participants in study v. non participants and setting of lab v. real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

unrepresentative population

A

doesn’t represent real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

realism

A

setting we are in for experiment does not look anything like real world where might get this treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

mundane realism

A

events look way they do in real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

experimental realism

A

subjects don’t take the experiment seriously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

psychological realism

A

the events triggered the same thoughts and emotions and processes as real-world events

22
Q

Hawthorne effect

A

subjects behave differently when they know they are being watched or monitored

23
Q

lab experiments

A

Take place in lab or specialized location
Intervening to create exogenous change in one variable while holding other variables constant

24
Q

field experiments

A

Takes place in real world setting not in artificial lab or simulation like school sor businesses → substantial time, organization

25
survey experiments
Method of incorporating an experiment in the design and structure of the survey instrument itself Often used to test effects of variation in questionnaire or wording also referred to as split-ballot survey
26
split-ballot survey
print off copies of survey A and survey B and randomly assign
27
cluster randmoizibiliity
Groups or clusters rather than individuals are randomized Helps prevent leakage of the treatment to the control group Less statistical equivalence from randomization
28
arms experiment
Various possible treatments Basic experiment has two arms - treatment and control Randomized study can compare multiple possible treatment or control conditions
29
does-response relationship
How the effect of the experiment varies as dosage increases Ex. large class size v. small, but how large?
30
linear trend
large the does larger the response
31
curvilinear trend
as when an increasing dose reaches a point of diminishing response
32
abrupt trend
effect kicks in all at once only when the dosage reaches a particular level
33
analysis of randomized experiments
Usually just a difference of means
34
sample size
Number of units in each group Each group must be large enough to achieve balance and to get desired precision of treatment effect Can use power analysis to determine sample sizes
35
drawbacks of randomized experiments
Not all IV’s are controllable Ethical considerations prevent some experiments Low external validity Can resolve some of these problems with natural and quasi experiments
36
factorial experiments
Experiments that try to measure the effects of more than one independent variable called factors
37
main effects
Average of one factor across levels of the other factors in experiment
38
interaction effects
Effect of both factors together is more or less than the sum of the two main effects
39
between subjects experiments
When a group could end up i either one group or the other but not both Comparison is between subjects or units in treatment or control group
40
within-subjects experiments
Experiment applies to two or more treatments to same people at different times Experimental conditions are within each person or unit so they each are exposed to both treatment and control conditions
41
repeated - measures experiments
Repeated outcomes measures taken on each sub experimental and simply observe people repeatedly over time
42
unobtrusive measures
Measures that occur naturally or routinely or otherwise do not disturb the subjects in an experiment
43
blind experiments
Help correct the problem of the placebo effect by keeping subjects ignorant of which group they are in
44
double-blind experiments
Researcher and participant don't know what groups are which
45
contamination
When something happens in the course of implementing the study that compromises the integrity and logic of the experiment
46
noncompliance
Treatment group fails to fully follow the treatment
47
attrition
Participants dropping out from experiment
48
minimal detectable effect
Smallest effect that would still have practical significance
49
heterogenous treatment effect
Different people respond differently to treatment
50
average treatment effects
Suggest the average of the various individual effects that the treatment ha on each person who participates in study