chapter 19 and 20 Flashcards
early classification of organisms
aristotle- species are fixed made the SCALA NATURAE (scale of nature) organisms on scale of increasing complexity and they are fit for their specific environment “god created organisms for each environment”
carolus linnaeus- binomial nomenclature and nested classification kpcofgs
lammarck- use/disuse theory- body parts being used grow and ones that aren’t being used disintegrate or shrink. - inheritance of acquired characteristics and change that an organism acquires in their life time is directly passed on to its offspring (single organism can evolve (wrong))- organisms had a drive to change. people regarded him as very wrong but he did realize that organisms do evolve which is very important
Darwin
naturalist, went on the HMS beagle and found evidence that allowed him to make his theory of evolution. he observed an earth quake- fossils can surface and natural processes shape the earth- thats why he found ocean fossils in the andes ( lyell slow earth geological processes)
galapagos-islands off the coast of south america, darwin found similar birds that were different species and that were unique to each island but resembled animals in south america – therefore the galapagos islands were colonized by a species of bird from the mainland. The species adapted to the new environment and new species evolved that are closely related
adaptations
- inherited characteristics that enhance survival and reproduction in specific environments – adaptations to new environments can result in a new species closely related to another species
- new species result from a gradual accumulation of adaptations (this happened to the finches-beaks and behaviours adapted to resources available
natural selection
process in which individuals with certain inherited traits tend to survive and reproduce more then others because of the traits. this is the mechanism of descent with modification. (evolution)
-substantial modification of a species over many generations- the less favourable traits will disappear
- natural selection increases match between an organism and their environment
-change in environment results in natural selection and adaptation to new conditions and sometimes a new species.
IMPORTANT
** individuals do not evolve ( lamarck wrong) -a population does
** natural selection only increases or diminishes only inheritable traits that differ among individuals in population- if all members in population have a genetically identical trait evolution by natural selection does not occur
**environmental factors vary over time and natural selection is always operating, traits favoured depend on the environmental pressures.
ideas from Darwins book
descent with modification by means of natural selection explains why - theres a huge diversity of life -unity of life (shared characteristics of life) -match of organisms to their environments
descent with modification
organisms share many characteristics (unity of life) -descent of all organisms from one common ancestor - the descendants all live in varied environments which results in diverse modifications or adaptations that fit to environments. - common ancestor lead to all life today- history of life tree - the gaps in evolution of closely related species can be explained by their extinction - organisms that are similar to one may have gone extinct at some point in time leaving a gap
artificial selection- humans have modified species by selecting and breading individuals with desired traits - a similar process happens in nature
2 observations–1. members of population vary in inherited traits —— advantageous traits allow these animals to survive and reproduce a lot. 2. all species produce more offspring then can survive so many don’t—— leads to accumulation of favourable traits in a population over generations
CONNECTION- natural selection connected to over production of offspring (over production - thomas malthus)
characteristic of all species- organism has advantageous traits it will pass them on to offspring - more survive then others in the species increasing the frequency of this trait throughout generations –natural selection leads to increase in amount of favourable traits in a population
support of evolution (plant)
PLANT EXPERIMENT- soapberry bugs use beak(hollow mouth part) to feed on seeds inside fruit- beak length corresponds to seed depth = effective. prediction; fruit with seeds closer to the surface will result in natural selection of bugs with shorter beaks prediction correct. conclusion; change in size of food resulted in evolution by natural selection for matching beak size ( same if fruit was larger)– natural selection caused rapid evolution in a wild population
support of evolution ( bacteria)
evolution of bacteria results in bacteria resistant drugs- that can be very harmful like MRSA and there has been an increase of in virulent forms. USA300 form of MRSA is a flesh eating disease
-1943 penicillin used as antibiotic until strains became resistant, other strains became resistant to other antibiotic strains as well.
ex methicillin deactivates proteins used in cell wall and some MRSA populations had variations some could synthesize their cell wall without this protein which could survive and the treatment and reproduce at higher rates once the other bacteria had been killed.
how bacteria become resistant; they exchange genes. present day multi drug resistant strains may have emerged over time as MRSA strains that were resistant to different antibiotics and have exchanged genes.
conclusion of support of evolution
natural selection edits organisms and does not create them– the drug selects for resistant individuals in population– it also depends on time and place- favours characteristics in genetically variable population that have advantage in current time and place
Homology (evidence of evolution)
-similarity resulting from common ancestor- related species have similar characteristics with a different function
–anatomical homologies- forelimbs of mammals have the same arrangement of bones but appendages of species or even class of mammals have different functions such as flying or walking.
homologous structures- variations on structural them present in common ancestor– embryos also show anatomical homologies- vertebrates all have a posterior tail pharyngeal arches and these and these all develop into structures with different functions
vestigial structures ( evidence of evolution)
features present in organisms no longer being used, but their ancestors may have used them- ex; hip bones in snakes no longer used.
molecular level-homologous genes - some have new function but some keep their function-ex; humans and bacteria share same genes but they each do a different thing
convergent evolution (evidence of evolution)
indépendant evolution of similar features in different lineages- two animals from two different ancestors evolved independently but have adapted to similar environments resulting in similar characteristics —-ANALOGOUS- similar function but not a common ancestory- similar function- different structure
Fossil record ( evidence of evolution
past organisms differed from present day organisms and species have become extinct- show evolutionary changes that have occurred in various groups of organisms- driven by natural selection-ex; fossils of cetaceans ( whales dolphins proposes) show that they are more closely related to even toed ungulates (dear pigs and camels) earliest cetacean was 50-60 million years ago - most mammals terrestrial so cetaceans originated from land mammals. in this case life on land moved to life in the sea. oner time descent with modification produced increasingly large differences among these two related groups of organisms resulting in diversity
biogeography
study of geographic distribution of species - influenced by factors such continental drift– (PANGAEA) fossils of different groups of organisms can be found in places corresponding to the previous arrangement of the continents
ENDEMIC SPECIES- species unique to a specific place ( usually island) – Darwin island– island species are closely related to species from nearest mainland- thesis species colonized the island and a new species evolved as the species from the island adapted to the islands environment
— this explains how tow islands with similar environments (far away from each other) are populated by species more closely related to species on the mainland instead of each other (the mainland environment may be very different)– this is also known as convergent evolution ( misleading when classifying organisms)
darwin theoretical view of life
darwins theory extremely strong- backed uo by incredible amounts of evidence and fills holes in many questions, however some things are missing- natural selection is only one mechanism for evolution.
phylogeny
phylogenetic tree
-evolutionary history of a species or group of species – grouping based on DNA ( i think)
- evolutionary history of a group of organisms- branching tree matches how taxonomists have classified groups of organisms nested within each other-
but taxonomists may have misplace species because they have lost key features - species looks more closely to another but its actually not( they may have undergone convergent evolution– have analogous structures) DNA evidence determines this - a phylogenetic tree represents a hypothesis of evolutionary relationships of different group
-branch points- divergent of two evolutionary lineages
sister taxa- two most recently related taxons in phylogenetic tree they are most closely related to each other
-basal taxon- lineage that diverges in early history of group
-tree rooted- most recent common ancestor of all taxon included
hierarchal classification
carolus linnaeus grouped species of increasing exclusive categories in a taxonomic system called the linen system- species in genus in family in order in class in phylum in kingdom- characteristics useful for classifying one group may not work for another group- larger categories not comparable between lineages- two groups may not have the same degree of morphological or genetic diversity
also carolus linnaeus created binomial nomenclature- two part biological name for every species– genus and the specific epithet ( unique for each species)
genus first letter capitalized the rest, species, all lower case, whole thing italicized
what do phylogenetic trees show
pattern of descent not phenotypic similarities - related organism may not physically be similar if lineages have diverged at different rates– ex: crocodiles are more closely related to birds then lizards
- sequence of branching of tree does not indicate age of species (unless you fricking make the branch lengths correspond to time)
- only shows most recent common ancestor of two species (page 384 3rd paragraph)
- taxon on phylogenetic tree did not evolve from the one next to t; they shared a common ancestor with is now extinct
applying phylogenetics
infer species identities by analyzing relatedness of DNA sequences from different organisms ( it was done with whale meat)
**phylogenies inferred from morphological and molecular data
morphological and molecular homologies`
phenotypic is morphological and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry –animals with same bones have morphological homology- genes and DNA sequences homologous if they are descended from sequences carried by a common ancestor- sometimes morphologic divergence of two species large but genetic divergence small vice versa
homology vs analogy
phylogeny based on homology( shared ancestry) analogous animals are very different sharing a distant common ancestor but appear as though they share a recent one due to similar characteristics pressured by convergent evolution.
ex; birds and bats both fly, but birds are more closely related to crocodiles and bats to cats thus a bats wing is analogous to a birds not homologous.
– distinguishing between analogy and homology loin at complicity of characteristics being compared- the more similar elements the more likely it is they shared a common ancestor—- same with genes-if two organisms share many DNA portions the genes are homologous
evaluating molecular homologies
closely elated species DNA is similar and distantly related species genes differ greatly –different bases and gene lengths. insertions and deletion mutations accumulate differences indicate lineages diverged a long time ago ( even if morphologically similar) - also organisms closely related if they have similar genes but are morphologically different.
molecular homoplasies (analogies)
organisms that do not appear closely related yet have very similar portions of DNA ???? check this one
Cladistics
common ancestor is primary criterion to classify organisms- species in group called clades
clade consists of ancestral species plus descendants – clades nested in larger clades - taxon= clade if clade is monophyletic
monophyletic- ancestral species +all of descendants
paraphyletic- ancestor + some but not all descendants
polyphyletic-includes members with different ancestors -most recent common ancestor not in group