Chapter 2 Flashcards
(22 cards)
Scientific Method
a systematic way to pursuing answers to questions
1) Pose a question
2) Hypothesis
3) Conduct a study/experiment
4) Draw a conclusion - Do results support, or nah?
Theory
organized set of assumptions or premises based on logic, observation, and/or a set of facts, that possibly explain a particular phenomenon and how the various assumptions or premises are interrelated; TESTABLE; BASED ON CREDIBLE EVIDENCE; useful for explaining or predicting phenomena
Operationally Defined
Process of making variables measurable
Variables
Anything that varies!
Hindsight
“Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc” - “After the fact” reasoning; logical fallacy; when individuals are told something, and then they reason why - yes - that thing is obviously true
Theory of Evolution
idea that “advanced” organisms evolved from “less advanced” organisms - has scientific basis
Intelligent Design
Life is too complicated and complex to have happened by chance (or by evolution); some “supreme power” must have caused life to begin, including creation of the universe; BELIEF NOT THEORY
5 Methods of Research
1) Correlational
2) Experimental
3) Survey
4) Case Study
5) Naturalistic-Observation
Correlational Method
As the values of one variable increase, do the values of the other variable increase (or decrease) as well?
Ex: eating ice cream and drowning.
THIRD VARIABLE present: temperature
Resist making casual conclusions - may be correlated, but not causes of each other
Experimental Method
Determine if one variable CAUSES another variable
Independent variable vs. Dependent variable
Experimental Group vs. Control Group
Must be randomly assigned; preferably (to reduce risk of confound variables)
Independent Variable
causes something
Dependent Variable
DEPENDS on the IV; affected (is caused by…?)
Experimental Group
participants in a study receive treatment
Control Group
participants receive a placebo, or nothing
Randomly Assigned
participants not permitted to select a group in which they would like to be; bias
Confound Variables
cause misinterpretation of the meaning of results (e.g. letting participants decide for themselves)
Double-Blind Study
1) participants do not know their group (i.e. experimental or control)
2) researchers measuring variables do not know participants’ groups
Goal: NO BIAS
Robust
findings of a study are consistent findings; can replicate study
Internal validity
degree to which a study’s outcome was due to the independent variable
Survey Method
LIMITATIONS:
1) Honesty - people lie
2) Fallible people - faulty memories
3) Q Phrasing - may elicit desired response on survey (e.g. push poll)
HOW?:
1) open-ended Q’s (pro: free to answer; con: how to “score”?)
2) Likert-type rating scale [SD, D, N, A, SA] (pro: easy to quantify; con: force answers into narrow range)
Case Study Method
involves studying rather intensely one (or a handful) of individuals on a case by case basis
Naturalistic-Observation Method
subjects merely “observed” in their own natural environment; goal: describe and understand behavior - NOT determine causality or correlations between variables;
BUT “reactivity” - subjects do not behave as they otherwise would honestly when being watched