Chapter 2 Flashcards
(11 cards)
Argument Premise Conclusion Statement Proposition
Is a systematic group of statements
Provides evidence and logical support for the main idea 👉🏽
Claimed to follow from the alleged evidence
Is a declarative sentence that has a truth value of true or false
Is the meaning or info content of a statement
Logic
Is a philosophical science that evaluates arguments or the art of reasoning
Two conditions that must be fulfilled to be Agm passage
A premise defn and a conclusion defn is the answer the two claims malet new the factual claim and inferential claim are the two types
Inferential claim
And the two types
Certain kind of reasoning
EXPLICIT. Has indicator words
IMPLICIT doesn’t have indicator words
Non arg passage
And the types
Which lack an inferential claim
Warning, Piece of advice, Statement of belief or opinion, Loosely associated statements, report( just states smt doesn’t argue abt anything), expository( elaborates smt), illustration( like a manual), explanation, conditional statement ( if then statement)
Two types of conditions that are important in logic
Necessary and sufficient
ASB if A occurs then B occurs when a is all that is needed for b to occur
ANB if B occurs then A occurs when B cannot occur w out the occurrence of A
The three factors that differ DED AND IND
The occurrence of special indicator words
The strength of the inferential link bw p and c
Form of argumentation the argues use
Phrases it must be the case that and must are ambiguous
Instances of DED
Argument based on:
Mathematics
Definition
Syllogism (Categorical… all, no, some & hypothetical….. 1/2 conditional statement & disjunctive…… either or)
Instances of IND
Prediction Analogy Generalization Authority Sign Casual inference Scientific arg (most of the time but not always) I is from p to g, d is from g to p based on Aristotle
Strong IND
Weak IND
- If p is t, improbable to be f
- If p is t, probable to be f
N.B validity & invalidity and strength & weakness doesn’t depend on the statements being true so it’s indirectly related to truth values
Df be sound and cogency
In sound arg it’s only required for both the p to be t but in cogent arg the p must not only be t they must also not ignore some important piece of evidence that outweighs the given evidence and entails a quite df c