Chapter 3 Flashcards
The need for justice
The author states that justice is required because it is not the nature of human beings to be generous, openhearted or fair
And that if we behaved all the time with these virtues we would not need justice
Fairness:
the condition of being impartial.
It is related to equal treatment. It is the allocation of equal
shares and equal opportunities
Equality:
refers to equal treatment for similar people and acts.
Impartiality:
it is the core of our system of criminal justice
-it is not favoring one party or interest more than another
Origins of the Concept of Justice
The concept of justice originates in the Greek word dike, which refers to everything staying in its proper place.
Plato
believed justice was achieved by maintaining the social status quo. He classed it as one of the four civic virtues (along with wisdom, temperance, and courage).
Aristotle
believed justice was the basis of law, defining
it as the unwritten customs of a people that distinguish between what is and is not honorable.
Aristotle, Cont.
He believed that each individual is suited to a certain role
And that those with the highest intellect should be given schooling, those that are musical should be trained as musicians for society,
An those without qualities should serve as slaves
Distributive Justice (1 of 4)
Distributive justice concerns what measurements should be used to allocate society’s resources
e.g. issue such as affirmative action, welfare, free schooling,
Economic goods (income or property)
Opportunities for development (education or
citizenship)
Recognition (honor or status)
Since some possessions are scarce, justice requires what?
Since some possessions are scarce, justice requires that goods be distributed using standards of entitlement such as need and desert.
Distributive Justice (2 of 4) (Egalitarian theories)
start with the basic premise of
equality or equal shares for all
Marxist theories
place need above desert or
entitlement
Libertarian theories
promote freedom from state
interference
Utilitarian theories
attempt to maximize benefits for
society
What is the concept of the Veil of Ignorance
That an ideal system of justice and distribution would be designed as if the people did not know which status in society they had.
This would insure that the system was fair to everyone.
- E.g. the original American rights were designed by land-owning whites so it gave only these people rights and power = under the veil the original lawmakers would have to act as if they did not know what position they
had in
Rawls Veil of Ignorance, Cont.
Under Rawl’s theory of justice, retributive punishment is limited in such a way as to benefit the least advantaged.
The just benefit for any offense must be considered as if one does not know whether one is the offender, the victim, or a disinterested bystander.
Pay
The author states that most people believe that police are underpaid.
Corrective Justice (1 of 4) ( Substantive justice)
refers to issues of inherent fairness in what we do to people in the name of justice
Retributive justice
is based on balance
Justice demands that the criminal must suffer pain or loss proportional to what the victim was forced to suffer.
E.g. an eye for an eye
A life for a life can make simple sense
The status of the victim
Historically, the status of the victim was important in determining the level of harm and therefore punishment
Mercy
Concept of mercy: when even if the offender is guilty they are not punished for various reasons such as need and context of the crime.
The Law of Sanctuary
allows a person respite from
punishment within the confines of church grounds.
Utilitarian justice:
Utilitarian justice: only supports punishment if it
benefits society
Beccaria and Bentham
Punishment should be based on the seriousness of the crime.
And How well it prevents crime in the future
The Hedonistic Calculus
Bentham said we must calculate the potential rewards of a crime so that the amount of threatened pain could be set to deter people from committing the crime.
And that it would be immoral to punish or hurt people more than needed to deter future crime.