Chapter 3 Flashcards
(24 cards)
What are interpretive theories?
- Theories that draw attention to people’s intersubjective understandings of the world around them, other people, and themselves
- Focus on meanings that emerge from interactions between people who are engaged in symbolic dialogue
- Symbolic interactionism, labelling theories, and theory of deviant career
What are critical theories?
- Theories that focus on power dynamics that underlie creation of social rules and they have emancipatory foundation
- Self-reflective, value-orienting foundation
- Power relations that underlie creation of social rules
- Goal of social justice
- Conflict theories, power-reflexive theories, feminist theories, and post-modern theories
What approach do labelling theories and conflict theories make up?
- Constructionist approach
What is symbolic interactionism?
- Theoretical perspective that describes society as composed of social interaction, which occurs via communication through symbols; foundation for all interpretive theories - communication is source of all meaning and understanding
- Develop understanding and attribute meaning to world around us and to ourselves on basis of interactions we have had with others
- Society is created by social interaction; interaction occurs via symbols; symbols have different meanings in different contexts
What are the various processes involved in symbolic interactionism?
- Role taking: Place ourselves in roles of other to see from their point of view, which influences our own attitudes and actions
- Looking-glass self: Our assumptions about what others think influences how we think about ourselves and how we act
- Significant others: People who are personally important to us (perceptions and reactions matter)
- Generalized others: Perception of the viewpoints of generic “people” in society (what would “people” say)
- Based on these processes, individuals come together and form groups based on shared perceptions
- Deviance dance can emerge - some will type others as deviant while others will say the are normal
What are labelling theories?
- Interpretive theories that describe process by which individuals are labelled as deviant, which then has implications for how others treat them and their own subsequent behaviours and identities
- Identities will begin to incorporate label
What is tagging? What is the dramatization of evil?
- Tagging: Deviant label we initially attach to an individual’s behaviour
- Dramatization of evil: Judgement that is no longer a particular behaviour that is deviant, but rather it is the person themselves that is deviant
- Initially identify particular act as deviant (“tagging”) but then come to generalize judgement to person as a whole (“dramatization of evil”)
- Results in changes to identity, subsequent behaviour correspond to label
What is the difference between primary and secondary deviance? What is master status?
- Primary deviance: Occasional rule breaking everyone engages in, seldom noticed and rarely caught
- Secondary deviance: Lifestyle and identity based on chronic rule breaking - getting caught sets in series of processes that result in secondary deviance
- Master status: Core characteristic by which others identify a person (labelled as deviant = master status)
What is stigmatization? What is dramaturgy? What are the front-stage and back-stage selves?
- Stigmatization: Process of exclusion that follows deviant master status
- Dramaturgy: Interpretive school of thought that suggests social life is similar to performing in theatre - front-stage selves and back-stage selves
- Front-stage self: Social roles people play when in front of variety of audiences
- Back-stage self: Individuals’ identities and behaviours when they are no longer in front of any audience
What is a spoiled identity? What is a discredited or discreditable stigma? Impression management?
- Stigmatization faced when an individual assumes a deviant role on front stage
- Discredited: Stigma is clearly known and visible
- Discreditable: Stigma can be hidden and is unknown
- Impression management: Techniques used by individuals to manage their stigmatization (e.g., humour, educational, defiance, cowering)
What is disintegrative shaming? Reintegrative shaming? Tertiary deviance?
- Disintegrative shaming: Process by which deviantized persons are rejected from the community
- Reintegrative shaming: Individuals are temporarily stigmatized for their deviant acts, but then accepted back into the community (positive consequence of stigmatization; stigma is temporary)
- Tertiary deviance: Following person’s transition to secondary deviance, his or her efforts to resist deviant label and instead redefine normal in a way that includes the deviantized behaviour or characteristic
What is the deviant career?
- Interpretive theory of deviance that claims deviance emerges, progresses through stages, and changes over time, similar to developmental stages of a career
- Career contingencies: Various turning points that influence directions people take (entrance phases, management phases, exit phases)
What is the pure, falsely accused, and secret deviant?
- Pure deviant: Engage in deviance and are perceived and responded to as such
- Falsely accused deviant: Perceptions and reactions matter, not objective reality
- Secret deviant: Aren’t caught and behaviour does not result in labelling/stigmatization
What are the limitations of interpretive theories?
- Most significant is lack of attention to social structure (structural considerations have been integrated with an integrative perspective - e.g., structural and individual considerations for drug addiction)
- Lemert’s version of labelling theory criticized for ignoring role of social structure - focuses on adolescents and not long-term; only looks at those who have been formally labelled (doesn’t compare those who have not been labelled); processes involved in transition from primary to secondary deviance not addressed sufficiently
- Many have argued that theories reflect processes rather than formal theories (no concepts to be operationalized, not testable)
- Have been integrated with many other theories to explain situations
What are the core assumptions of conflict theories?
- Social rules do not emerge out of consensus but rather out of conflict and serve interests of the powerful
- Powerful groups less likely to act out because the rules were made for them in the first place
- Members of less powerful societies more likely to act out because: their sense of oppression and alienation causes them to act out in rule-breaking ways, social rules have defined the acts of powerless as deviant in the first place
What are instrumental marxists vs. structural marxists?
- Instrumental Marxism: Proposes social rules are created to serve the interests of the powerful, becoming tools to control the proletariat - deviant label controls proletariat and maintains economic structure of society
- Structural Marxism: Proposes social rules are created to protect the capitalist economic system and may then be applied to members of the proletariat or bourgeoisie
What are pluralist, cultural, and group conflict theories?
- Pluralistic: Multiple dimensions to inequality or power as opposed to just economic dimension
- Cultural: Dominant culture within a society imposes its norms on everyone despite the fact that other cultures within that society have varying norms
- Group: Groups struggling for power with each group attempting to win the support of authorities (their norms will gain legitimacy)
What are ideology, hegemony, and false consciousness?
- Ideology: Worldview held by society’s powerful groups - idea about the way things should be, powerful groups are the source of these ideas but then promote ideologies as common sense
- Hegemony: Gramsci. Dominant way of seeing and understanding the world, as determined by ideology of powerful groups and then taught to citizens as common sense
- False consciousness: Frank school. False sense of freedom held by powerless groups
What are power-reflexive theories?
- Emphasize interconnections of knowledge and power and propose all claims to knowledge are socially situated, embedded within relations of power
- Multiple discourses (bodies of knowledge, all that is “known” about phenomenon) exist but power dynamics determine which discourses become legitimized - e.g., punishing criminals has more discourse due to powerful preferring this view as opposed to rehabilitation
- Pervasiveness of regulatory mechanisms within a panoptical society results in self-surveillance and self-control
What are feminist theories?
- Emphasis on female experiences and their divergence from male experiences (human experience is gendered)
- Mainstream (“malestream”) sociological theories have been criticized for: ignoring women altogether, assuming research on male experience can be generalized to female experience, treating women as peripheral “other” that stands in contrast to male normative standard
- Females are considered deviant if they differ from males
What is the difference between radical vs. liberal feminism?
- Radical = e.g., prostitution as example of sexual oppression
- Liberal = e.g., occupation in which women need to be given more control over working conditions
What are postmodern theories? What is skeptical vs. affirmative postmodernism?
- Based broadly on the conception of rejection (reality is too complex, grand, overarching theories don’t work)
- Skeptical postmodernism: Knowledge is impossible and only chaos and meaninglessness exist
- Affirmative postmodernism: Deconstructs master narratives, overarching theories, or knowledge and focuses analysis on the local and specific - can only gain knowledge in specific contexts, not generalizable
What has rapid social change since WWII resulted in postmodernist theories?
- Society being more commercial than industrial (produce and consume)
- People being consumers rather than citizens
- The “end of the individual” (lost sight of who we are as individuals, image constantly changes)
- Erosion of any dominant moral codes by which deviance can be judged (no longer exist)
What are the limitations of critical theories?
- Inconsistent empirical support for relationship between economic factors and crime and for structural bias in criminal justice system
- Reflect processes, perspectives, or ideologies rather than formal theories (in response to this, theoretical integration has occurred - interactionist and conflict theories to study racial profiling)
- Fail to recognize consensus that exists in society (there is more consensus in society than theory gives credit to)