Chapter 3 Flashcards
(43 cards)
The employment relationship is regulated by three sources of law. What are they?
- The Constitution
- Labour legislation
- The law of contract
What is the definition of an employee, as found in s213 of the LRA?
Any person, excluding an independent contractor, who works for another person or for the State, and who receives, or is entitled to receive, any remuneration and any other person who in any manner assists in carrying on or conducting the business of an employer
Why is it important to establish whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor?
Because independent contractors are not protected by the Labour Relations Act
Name the tests used to determine whether a person is an employee of an independent contractor. Give a brief explanation of each
- The control test (employment relationship characterized by element of control)
- The organization test (whether person for part of employer’s organization- dress code, etc)
- The dominant impression test (looks at main impression of relationship)
In 2002 a rebuttable presumption regarding who is an employee was added to the LRA. S200A states:
Pg27
What was the importance of the rebuttable presumption?
It incorporates the elements of control, organization, and dominant impression tests and reverses the onus of proof
When do the rebuttable presumption apply?
When employees earn less than the prescribed threshold amount
Recent court decisions have stated that the true test to determine the nature of the relationship between parties is the …..?
Reality test
What is the criteria for the reality test?
- The employer has a right to supervise or control the employee
- The employee forms an integral part of the organization of the employer; and
- The employee is economically dependent on the employer
Must all the criteria of the reality test be met in order to determine the nature of the relationship?
No, any one of the factors is sufficient
True or false: the existence of an employment relationship is determined by the conclusion of a written contract of employment
False. It is not determined by a written employment contract, despite a provision in the BECA requiring a written contract
Written employment contracts can reveal a lot about the nature of the relationship; but the are not conclusive, especially where it is abused by the employer to escape legal obligations. Name cases that demonstrate this
- Denel v Gerber
- Building Bargaining Council v Melmons Cabinets CC
- Dyokhwe v De Kock
- Murray v Minister of Defense
True or false: the existence of an employment relationship is determined by the conclusion of a written contract of employment
False. It is not determined by a written employment contract, despite a provision in the BECA requiring a written contract
Written employment contracts can reveal a lot about the nature of the relationship; but the are not conclusive, especially where it is abused by the employer to escape legal obligations. Name cases that demonstrate this
- Denel v Gerber
- Building Bargaining Council v Melmons Cabinets CC
- Dyokhwe v De Kock
- Murray v Minister of Defense
What is the definition of an employer?
An employer is any person that employs or provides work to an employee and that remunerates the employee for such services, or permits such employee to assist it in the carrying on or conducting of its business
Why do Temporary Employment Services (TES) or labour-brokering agreements make identification of the employer problematic?
- Because the traditional “methods” for determining the employer do not apply to TES agreements. Such as:
1. The dominant impression test
2. The control test
3. The organization test,
4. The rebuttable presumptions, and - The above would indicate that the client is the employer; however the TES is in fact the employer
5. The reality test
The employment contract between a TES and its employees usually contains a ….. clause
Automatic termination
Why have automatic termination clauses been regarded as being contrary to the LRA and to public policy?
- Because it allows for the cancellation of the employment contract if the client cancels the service contract for any reason.
- And because in theses circumstances the client does not have to conduct disciplinary enquiries, or comply with the requirements for unfair dismissal.
- As such employees are left vulnerable
Name a case that pertains to the impermissibility of automatic termination clauses. What was the justification for the impermissibility?
SATAWU v Fidelity Supercare Cleaning Services Group (Pty) Ltd.
Justification: these clauses limit an employee’s right to fair labour practices
Why was the Labour Relations Amendment Act 6 of 2014 introduced?
In order to address the abuses that were occurring
Define temporary employment in terms of s198A
Work by an employee for a client:
- For a period not more than 3 months
- Irrespective of the length of the contract, as a substitute for an employee of the client that is temporarily absent for, eg maternity leave
- In a type of work that is classified as a temporary service by a bargaining council agreement, sectoral agreement or ministerial notice
True of false: the new s198A applies only to employees earning below the prescribed threshold
True
What is the result of employees not fitting into the s198A definition of temporary employment?
The are deemed to be employees of the client and to be employed on an indefinite basis by the client. They are to be treated no worse (in terms of pay, benefits, ect) than a permanent employee performing the same/similar work
Are workers that are engaged in illegal contracts of employment entitled to protection by the LRA? Why?
Yes they are. Because a valid contract of employment is not required for workers to be classified as employees and protected by the LRA. The substance of the relationship is more dominant than the legal form it takes