Chapter 4: Operational, Financial, and Strategic Risk - Review (Part 3 - Financial cont'd) Flashcards
(19 cards)
VaR and EaR
Value at Risk (VaR): method of determining probability of loss on an investment portfolio over a certain, usually short, time
Earnings at Risk: the maximum expected loss of earnings within a certain degree of confidence. Usually used for nonfinancial organizations
How does VaR work?
VaR measures the probability of a loss in an investment’s value exceeding a threshold level. For example, a one-day, 5% VaR of $300,000 means there is a 5% probability of losing $300,000 or more over the next day.
Three benefits of VaR as a risk measure
- The potential loss associated with an investment decision can be quantified
- Complex positions (typically involving multiple investments) are expressed as a single figure
- Loss is expressed in easily understood monetary terms
Limitation of VaR as a measure
- It does not accurately measure the extent to which to which a loss may exceed the VaR threshold.
- This can be addressed with Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), which also takes into account extremely large losses that may occur
How can Earnings at Risk be determined
- Determining EaR entails modeling the influence of factors such as changes in sales; production costs; and the prices of producs, commodities, and components used in production
- Monte Carlo simulation can simulate effects of types of uncertainty
- The probasbility that an organization’s earnings will be greater than the EaR threshold is represented by the area under the distribution curve to the right of the EaR threshold
What is regulatory capital?
- Amount presribed by governments for financial institutions under their jurisdiction
- Dictates the amount of capital these institutions must hold to guard against risks
- Provides a sufficient cushion against unexpected reduction in the value of capital
What is Basel I and how does it define capital?
Basel I is an agreement to create standard RBC requirements for credit risk.
Capital is defined on two tiers:
- Tier 1: Core capital, essentially the same as equity capital
- Tier 2: supplementary capital, includes all capital other than core capial (ex. gains on investment assets, long-term debt that matures after 5 years, excess reserves for loan losses)
Weakness of Basel I and how Basel II addressed them
Basel I weak because it did not sufficiently take into account changes in assets’ risks or systemic risk
Basel II improved with three pillars:
* Minimum capital requirements that address risk
* Supervisory review of organization’s internal assessment process and capital adequacy
* Effective use of disclusre to strengthen market discipline and complement supervision
Basel II’s two approaches to measuring a financial institution’s credit risk
- Standardized approach (ratings from international rating agencies to determine an instution’s creditworthiness)
- Internal ratings-based (IRB) approach: allwos banks to use their internal rating systems and credit-scoring models to evaluate boorowers’ creditworthiness and calculate regulatory capital
Goals of Basel III to improve on Basel II
- Introduced a global liquidity framework
- Goals include improving quality, consistency, and transparency of banks’ capital base to help the commercial banking sector better absorb shocks from financila and exconomic stressors
- Offers improved risk management and governance
- Created a capital requirement (surcharge) for systemically important banks
Four ways that Basel III accomplishes its goals
- Capital planning
- Continually monitoring risk exposures and capital needs
- Establishing procedures to control or mitigate banks’ risk exposures and capital positions
- Reporting requirements
Five categories of capitalization under Basel III
- Well capitalized
- Adequately capitalized
- Undercapitalized
- Significantly undercapitalized
- Critically undercapitalized
Under Basel III, regulators and banks can take the folloiwng actions when they are not well capitalized
- Suspend dividends and management fees
- Restrict asset growth
- Require institution to obtain approval for acquisitions or to develop a capital-restoration plan
- Restrict deposit interest rates or officer’s pay
- Appoint a receiver/conservator within given time frames
RBC requirements for insurers
- Regulators establish minimum capital requirements for insurers to protect policyholders and claimants
- RBC system determines amount of capital an insurer needs to support its operations
- Asset risk, underwriting risk, and other risks applicable to the insurer are considered (i.e. credit risk for P&C comanies)
- RBC for Insurers Model ACt enables regulators to take action before an insurer becomes too financially weak
Asset risk for insurers
(Insurer RBC requirements)
- Asset risk: risk that the aset’s value will decrease
- Decrease in asset value reduces policyholder’s surplus
Credit risk for insurers
(Insurer RBC requirements)
- Reflects possibility that insurer will not be able to collect money owed to it
- Main sources: receivables; interest, dividends and real estate income; receivables from affiliates; receivalbes relating to uninsured accident and health plans; aggregate write-ins for assets
Underwriting risk for insurers
(Insurer RBC requirements)
Insurer is at risk of underwriting loss if it collects insufficient premiums and/or significantly underestimates its loss reserves
Action levels for insurers
(Insurer RBC requirements)
- Results of RBC formula determine action to be taken
- Ex. no action required if RBC is 200 percent or more of computed minimum
- At the lowest RBC computed minimum level (70-100%) the insurer is placed under regulatory control