Chapter 4: Organizational Context: Reward Systems Flashcards
(36 cards)
Why are rewards systems important?
- In social cognitive theory, reward consequences or contingencies play an important role in organizational behavior.
- An organization may have the latest technology, well-designed structures, and a visionary strategic plan, but unless the people at all levels are rewarded, all these other things may become hollow and not be carried out for performance improvement.
- emphasize the emerging importance of human capital
- Because intellectual/ human capital is now recognized as being central to competitive advantage in the new paradigm environment, attention must be given to rewarding this capital to sustain/ retain it and leverage it
Money: four of the important symbolic attributes
1) achievement and recognition
2) status and respect
3) freedom and control
4) power
Money affects:
motivation, job attitudes, and retention
In particular, money helps people attain both physical (clothing, automobiles, houses) and psychological (status, self-esteem, a feeling of achievement) objectives
Agency Theory
- agency theory is concerned with the diverse interests and goals that are held by a corporation’s stakeholders (stockholders, managers, employees) and the methods by which the enterprise’s reward system is used to align these interests and goals
- widely recognized finance and economics approach to understanding behavior by individuals and groups both inside and outside the corporation
- The theory draws its name from the fact that the people who are in control of large corporations are seldom the owners; rather, in almost every case, they are agents who are responsible for representing the interests of the owners
- Agency theory also examines the role of risk and how owners and managers may vary in their approach to risk taking.
Pay for Performance
- One study showed that the greater the pay spread, the worse the players performed
- a growing number of corporate shareholders are demanding that the chief executive officer pay be tied to a multiple of the lowest worker’s pay, thus controlling the range between the lowest and highest paid person in the organization
- A public poll indicated that a vast majority (87 percent) believe that executives “had gotten rich at the expense of ordinary workers
- overall, reward does not decrease intrinsic motivation
Effective Pay System Requirements
- The organization must clarify it’s goals (increased sales, higher profits, more market share).
- Results must be measurable
- Tie rewards to the outcomes
Base Wages or Salary Approach
- the amount of money that an individual is paid on an hourly, weekly, monthly, or annual basis
- If base pay is not in line with the market rate, organizations may find that they are unable to hire and retain many of their personnel
Merit Pay Approach
- employees a cost-of-living allowance and then allocate additional funds for those who are judged “meritorious.”
- the criteria for determining merit are often unclear
- difficult to quantify merit pay criteria
Individual Incentive Pay Plans
- individual incentive plans also pay people based on output or even quality.
- Some might include a combination payment plan in which the individual receives a guaranteed amount of money, regardless of how the person performs
- provide a “drawing account” against which the individual can take money and then repay it out of commissions
Bonuses
- Bonus pay for KPI’s met
- most companies are moving to bonus pay based on performance rather than fixed pay increases
Stock Options
- Option to buy company stock in the future at a predetermined fixed price
- if the executives are successful in their efforts to increase organizational performance, stock price will also increase
Pay for Performance - Potential Limitations
- one problem with bonuses and stock options is that they may have led to the excesses and ethical breakdowns experienced by too many firms in recent years
- The results of a study indicate that stock options prompt CEOs to take high-variance risks (not simply larger risks), but importantly it was also found that option loaded CEOs deliver more big losses than big gains
- measurement of KPI is another limitation
- narrow range of behaviors focused on bonus KPI’s
- individual incentive plans may pit employees against one another that may promote healthy competition, or it may erode trust and teamwork
Group Incentive Plans Types
- gainsharing plans
- profit sharing
- employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)
Gainsharing Plans
- share with the group or team the net gains from productivity improvements such as reduced product damage, customer complaints, accidents, or shipping errors.
- if everyone works to reduce cost and increase productivity, the organization will become more efficient and have more money to reward its personnel
- The first step is to determine the costs associated with producing the current output
- Then, at some predetermined point, such as six months, costs and output are measured and productivity savings are determined
- These gainsharing savings are then passed on to the employees, say, on a 75:25 basis
Profit-sharing Plans
- typically some portion of the company’s profits is paid into a profit-sharing pool then distributed to all employees.
- Some plans defer the profit share, put it into an escrow account, and invest it for the employee until retirement
employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)
- employees gradually gain a major stake in the ownership of the firm
- The process typically involves the company taking out a loan to buy a portion of its own stock in the open market. Over time, profits are then used to pay off this loan. Meanwhile the employees, based on seniority and/or performance, are given shares of the stock, a key component of their retirement plan. As a result, they eventually become owners of the company.
Group Incentive Plans Limitations
- often distribute rewards equally even if the contribution to the result is not the same
- rewards may be realized decades later as in the case of an employee’s profit-sharing or ESOP that is placed in a retirement account
- if group rewards are distributed regularly, such as quarterly or annually, employees may regard the payments as part of their base salary and come to expect them every year
New Pay Techniques
- Commissions beyond sales to customers
- Rewarding leadership effectiveness
- Rewarding new goals
- Pay for knowledge workers in teams
- Skill pay
- Competency pay
- Broadbanding
Commissions beyond sales to customers
- are aligned with the organization’s strategy and core competencies
- besides sales volume, the commission is determined by customer satisfaction and sales team outcomes such as meeting revenue or profit goals
Rewarding leadership effectiveness
- includes an employee-satisfaction measure to recognize a manager’s people-management skills
Rewarding new goals
- rewards under this approach are aimed at all relevant employees (top to bottom) contributing to goals such as customer satisfaction, cycle time, or quality measures
Pay for knowledge workers in teams
- part of this pay is initially given to individuals who have taken additional training
- the assumption being that their performance will increase in the future as a result of their newly acquired knowledge or skills.
Skill pay
- This approach recognizes the need for flexibility and change by paying employees based on their demonstrated skills rather than the job they perform.
- Although it is currently used with procedural production or service skills, the challenge is to apply this concept to the more varied, abstract skills needed in new paradigm organizations (e.g., design of information systems, cross-cultural communication
skills)
Competency pay
- This approach goes beyond skill pay by rewarding the more abstract knowledge or competencies of employees, such as those related to technology, the international business context, customer service, or social skills