Chapter 5 Flashcards
(43 cards)
In many cases, transactions performed by solicitors will fall outside the scope of FSMA regulations (i.e. there will be no need to obtain FCA authorisation in order to perform these transactions), due to which three reasons?
(a) they are not regulated investments at all (e.g. National Savings products, which are specifically excluded from the definition of securities); or
(b) although they are regulated investments, the activity relating to the investments is not regulated (e.g. they are providing generic advice only); or
(c) while the activity relating to the investments is regulated, one or more exclusions apply under the RAO (e.g. the ATP exclusion).
Where a person, acting in a business capacity, carries on by way of business an ‘activity of a specified kind which relates to an investment of a specified kind’ to which no exclusion applies, what must that person do?
obtain authorisation from the FCA (see Chapter 4 above); or alternatively
avoid authorisation if it can claim any of the exemptions.
What are the four big exemptions to ‘activity of a specified kind which relates to an investment of a specified kind’ ?
1) The Treasury can make an order under section 38 FSMA providing that a certain person or class of persons are exempt from the general prohibition. It has done this in order to exempt, inter alia, the Bank of England and the International Monetary Fund.
2) Agents which only sell the products of one particular company and which are not employed by that company (“tied agents” or “appointed representatives” under section 39 FSMA) will also be exempt, because the authorised person will be responsible for any regulated activity carried on by its authorised representatives.
3) Where the agent is employed by the authorised person, then the latter’s authorisation will cover him (although he would need to be approved too).
4) A general exemption (the ‘incidental’ exemption - provided the activity arises out of a professional service being provided to the client - see below), particularly important for solicitors, under section 327 FSMA, for members of professions carrying on exempt regulated activities.
In the context of UK law, what does incidental mean?
In the context of UK law, incidental means something that is not the main or primary purpose or activity, but rather something that is secondary or additional to it. An incidental activity is one that is subordinate or connected to a main activity but is not essential to it.
Part XX of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) provides an exemption from FCA regulation for professional firms. What was it?
Part XX of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) provides an exemption from FCA regulation for professional firms that carry out regulated activities. But these are not their main business activity (the activities are “incidental”). This exemption also applies to firms that provide services that do not require FCA protection for reasons of investor protection or market integrity. To qualify for this exemption, the profession must be supervised by a designated professional body (DPB), and the Treasury has designated The Law Society as one such body.
What is the “COPS rule” and how does it compare to the “necessary exclusion” according to section 67 of RAO?
The Complementary to Other Professional Services (COPS) rule (embedded in section 327 FSMA - part XX) exempts certain professional firms, including solicitors, from FCA regulation if their regulated activities are incidental to their main professional activity, and their profession is supervised by a designated professional body (DPB) recognized by the Treasury. This means that solicitors can carry out certain regulated activities, such as giving advice on investments, without being regulated by the FCA if it is incidental to their main business of providing legal services.
In contrast, Article 67 of the RAO provides a general exclusion from the requirement to be regulated by the FCA for any activity carried out in the course of carrying on a profession or business which does not otherwise consist of regulated activities, and which may reasonably be regarded as a necessary part of other services provided in the course of that profession or business. This exclusion is not limited to any specific profession or body, and the activity in question must not be remunerated separately from the other services provided.
Therefore, while both the COPS rule and Article 67 provide exemptions from FCA regulation for certain activities carried out by professional firms, the COPS rule is more specific to solicitors and other designated professional bodies, while Article 67 is a general exclusion that applies to any profession or business as long as certain conditions are met.
What does the “COPS rule” stipulate?
The regulated activity (i.e. the financial work) cannot be carried on in isolation for a client; rather, it must arise out of or be complementary to some other (non-regulated) professional service being provided by you to the particular client concerned (e.g. legal work).
Give examples to the “COPS rule” for corporate or matrimonial work, conveyancing, winding up an estate, or divorce settlement.
In corporate or matrimonial work: giving legal or tax advice or drafting documents (the primary service) where regulated investments are also involved.
In a conveyancing transaction on behalf of a client: dealing with the Land Registry (the primary service) and also arranging an endowment or pension mortgage as a complementary part of your service to that client.
Selling securities as part of winding up an estate or transferring securities as part of a divorce settlement.
The “COPS rule” requires the “incidental only test”. What criteria have to be assessed?
1) The activities carried out by the firm (which would otherwise be regulated) must constitute a minor part only of the firm’s professional services to its clients (i.e. less than 50% of the firm’s income must come from investment business).
Further qualitative factors, however, will also be relevant in judging whether activities are incidental, viz.:
2) The scale of regulated activities in proportion to other professional services provided to the client;
3) whether and to what extent the exempt regulated activities are held out by the firm as separate services (e.g. as a separate business conducted in isolation from the provision of professional services); and
4) The impression given of how the firm provides those activities (e.g. through advertising its services).
Thus, even if the regulated services can be shown to contribute a minor part only of the firm’s services as a whole, the way in which the services are advertised and/or presented as a separate business within the overall practice could mean that the services will not be considered as being ‘incidental to’ the firm’s services as a whole.
What does the abbreviation viz. stand for (legal context)?
The abbreviation “viz.” is short for “videlicet,” which is a Latin term that means “namely” or “that is to say.” It is often used in legal writing to introduce a specific example or to clarify a previous statement.
Case: When winding up a deceased’s estate, the co-executor wants to have advice on how to invest his share of the estate. Does this arise out of or is complementary to the provision of the probate professional services?
No, this is not complementary to the legal professional services.
In a probate matter, where the executor is your client, can you give advice to the beneficiary following the COPS rule?
No, both services (legal service - primary service) and the sale (the otherwise regulated activity) has to be supplied to the same client.
You successfully broker a settlement for the specific performance of a contract in which your client will purchase a certain number of shares in the other side’s company.
The activities of presenting the other party with a cheque on behalf of your client, drawing up a stock transfer form and submitting the completed form to the company secretary for registration of the transfer of ownership would all constitute the regulated activity of arranging a deal under the FSMA. Does the COP rule apply here?
Even if the above activities were not reasonably regarded as comprising a necessary part of the negotiation services (‘the necessary exclusion’ under the RAO), the Part XX FSMA general exemption should apply, since the arrangements arise out of and are complementary to the provision of a professional service to the client (negotiation of a settlement), and the manner of providing the service will be incidental to the provision of the negotiation itself.
A case in which you negotiate a settlement in a personal injury case in which your client will receive a lump sum payment, and the client now seeks your advice on how best to invest the money. Does the COP rule apply here?
No, such investment advice would not arise out of or be complementary to the litigation work done for the client, and would not therefore be exempt under Part XX FSMA.
For the COP rule (Part XX of FSMA) to apply, numerous factors must be met. What are those?
1) Membership of a profession (e.g., solicitor)
2) Complementary to other Professional Service (COPS)
3) Incidental-Only Test
4) Duty to Account for any Commission
5) Activity not prohibited by SRA’s Rules
For the COP rule to apply, the Duty to Account for Any Commission must be tested. What does that mean? What does accounting mean?
A solicitor cannot receive any reward or benefit from anyone other than the client without informing the client and accounting for it. This includes any commission or financial benefit received from a third party.
Accounting to the client does not mean simply telling the client that the firm will receive commission (or notifying the client that the firm has received commission). Rather the rule is that the commission will be held on behalf of the client.
What is a commission?
A commission refers to a payment received by a solicitor or their firm from a third party, such as a life assurance company, for arranging a product or service for their client. This commission is often a percentage of the premium paid by the client for the product or service, and it represents a financial benefit to the solicitor or their firm.
For the COP rule to apply, the Duty to Account for Any Commission must be tested. Accounting means that the commission will be held on behalf of the client. In which case is this not true?
The solicitor must hold the commission on behalf of the client, unless the client agrees in writing to set off the commission against any fee or gives their informed consent to the solicitor keeping the commission after full disclosure of the amount.
For the COP rule to apply, the Duty to Account for Any Commission must be tested. Accounting means that the commission will be held on behalf of the client. What happens if the client gives ‘negative consent’, i.e. does not object to the commission being kept by the solicitor?
‘blanket’ consent (e.g. obtaining the client’s consent to retain commission through standard terms) or ‘negative’ consent (where the client omits to indicate that he does not consent to the solicitor’s retention of commission) will not suffice.
For the COP rule to apply, the Duty to Account for Any Commission must be tested. If the client gives his informed consent to the firm’s keeping all commissions, having had full disclosure of the amount, what is the consequence?
If the client gives informed consent to the firm’s keeping all commissions, having had full disclosure of the amount, then the commission does not need to be held on behalf of the client. In other words, the solicitor or firm can keep the commission as their own financial benefit without breaching their professional duty to the client. However, it’s important to note that the client must be fully informed and give their consent in writing, and ‘blanket’ or ‘negative’ consent is not sufficient.
For the COP rule to apply, the Duty to Account for Any Commission must be tested. Accounting means that the commission will be held on behalf of the client. What does ‘holding on behalf of the client mean’?
“Holding on behalf of the client” means that the commission received by the solicitor or the firm is not the property of the solicitor or the firm but rather belongs to the client. The solicitor or the firm must keep the commission in a separate client account and not use it for their own purposes.
Under section 332 of the FSMA, what is the requirement to Designated Professional Bodies?
Designated professional bodies (DPBs) must make rules applicable to their members who are not authorized persons but carry on regulated activities in relation to the profession for which the DPB is established. These rules must ensure that the member only carries out regulated activities that are necessary for providing a particular professional service to a particular client.
What are the two sets of rules that the Law Society has created following section 332 of the FSMA?
1) The SRA Financial Services (Scope) Rules
2) The SRA Financial Services (Conduct of Business) Rules
1) The SRA Financial Services (Scope) Rules
2) The SRA Financial Services (Conduct of Business) Rules
What are the two most important differences between the two?
Purpose: The Scope Rules define the activities that are solicitors undertake without FCA authorization. The Conduct of Business rules regulate the manner in which solicitors’ firms should carry on regulated activities of the kind permitted by the Scope rules.
Violation: Violating the Scope Rules may result in a criminal offence according to section 23 FSMA. A breach could also result in a disciplinary action. Also, contracts resulting from the offence wouldn’t be enforceable. A violation of the Conduct of Business rules may ‘only’ result in disciplinary action by the SRA.