Chapter 5-8 Flashcards

(63 cards)

1
Q

Pavlov and the factors that determine a CR development

A
  1. The CS and the US must be paired together in time
  2. The CS must consistency lead up to the occurrence of the US.
  3. CS must provide more reliable information
  4. the strength of the CS affects the strength of the CR following a CS-US pairing
  5. Strength of the CR is affected by the intensity of the US,CS or both
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Trace conditioning

A

CS begins and ends before US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Simultaneous conditioning

A

CS and US are presented together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Backward Conditioning

A

least effective, US is presented and terminated before the CS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Temporal Conditioning

A

On schedule, no CS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blocking

A

prevention of the acquisition of a CR to a seconf stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vicarious Conditioning

A

modeling

respond to a stimulus after observing the experiences of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

contingency

A

relationship between behavior and reinforcement

environment determines this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Skinner Box

A

an enclosure in which an animal is maintained free from distracting stimuli and receive reinforcement for reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fundamental Law of Operant Conditioning

A

the occurrence of a operant is followed by an reinforcer then the rate of responding will increase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Shaping

A

slowly coaxed them into doing a desired behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Two types of chaining

A

Forward and Backward chaining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Edward Throndike and his Research

A

focused on animal intelligence, he would present animals with a problem and then give the problem again to see if performance was improved, and his conclusions were given behavior has one of two kinds of consequences or effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Examples of throndikes research

A

chicken in maze and puzzle box

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Law of effect

A

the relationship between behaviors and its consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Barry 1958

A

his study was rats divided into 2 groups and one group didn’t have food for 26.5 hours and the other group for 2.5 hours the rats that didn’t have food were a longer amount of time ran faster to get to the food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Contiguity

A

time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Contingency Managent

A

1st the assessment phase
2nd contingency contracting
3rd Implementation Program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Response Cost vs Time Out

A

Response Cost is having a consequence because you did something and Time out is limited time that you are kept from reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Aversives

A

unpleasant stimuli that induces change in behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Azrin, Hutchinson, and McLaughlin

A

squirrel monkey and a ball they found that is was pleasing to agress to something after punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Learned Helplessness

A

shock seemed to teach dogs to do nothing and learned to be helpless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Learned industriousness

A

increases the tendencies to work hard at difficult tasks for a long period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Seligmans Research

A

prepared and contraprepared, tend to give up then fight for control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Bramel, Taub, and Blum
Their study was that people reported feeling good after being aggressive
26
Bandura, Ross, and Ross
Frustration Study- kids seen a preschool model act aggressive towards a doll and the kids that seen the model ended up acting aggressive towards the doll too
27
Hokanson and colleagues
looked at blood pressure and blood pressure was high when punished and angry after releasing anger blood pressure was lowered
28
Dryer and Church
looked at rats in a T-maze and the rats that were shocked those rats would attack other rats so they could release aggression
29
Graduated vs. Participant Modeling
this was introduced by Bandura Grusecianel and Menlove, patient sees model move closer and closer until feared object is encountered.
30
Dollard, Doob, Miller, Mowrer, and Sears
came up with the stimulus/response theory social attachments are acquired as the result of classical conditioning experiences attachment to other people reflect the development of acquired motives
31
Premack's Principles
different behaviors have different relative values because some behavior occur more. high probablity behavior can be used to reinforced low probability behavior
32
Relative Value Theory
attributes a reinforcer effectiveness to its probability relative to other behaviors
33
Drive Reduction Theory
Hull; learning>>> adaptive process, drive is an internal arousal produced by deprivations and to reduce drive
34
Equilibrium Theory
seeks order
35
Response Deprivation Theory
animals programmed to exhibit specific level of responding to object importance to survival NEED BALANCE
36
Types of Punishment
Positive- organism responds and then receives some form of aversive stimulation Negative- loss of reward or not being able to obtain reward
37
Types of Reinforcement
positive- reinforcer that reinforces by its presentation negative- reinforcer that reinforcers by its removal primary- innate reinforcing properties (food) secondary- reinforcing properties through its association with a primary reinforcer
38
Olds and Milner
Pleasure is within the brain, brain stimulation reward, small wire in the rats brain
39
Stretching the ratio
this is when there is a gradual building up of responses for small amounts of reward ex: increasing gambling behavior
40
Ratio Strain
this the general weakening of responding found when large response reinforcer ratios are used
41
Extinction
elimination of the CR
42
3 factors that lead to extinction
1. strength of the CR 2. percentage of trials 3. length of exposure `
43
Matching Law
Herrenstein; the organisms behavior will come to mirror the contingencies of reward behavior 1 = reward 1
44
Hull vs. Hall
Hull; extinction process is a mirror image of acquisition - stronger the CR the slower the extinction, of that response Hall; omission of the US during extinction changes the subjects motivation level - getting rid of motivation
45
FR
constant number of responses are necessary to produce reinforcement - continuous reinforcement - most rapid way of reinforcement - post reinforcement pause
46
VR
an average number of responses produces reinforcement -number of responses change within different environments - produces a consistent response rate - no reinforcement pause
47
FI
the occurrence of reinforcement depends on both the passage of time and the exhibition of the appropriate behavior - no reinforcement until after a specific time period - scallop effect
48
VI
interval of time between available reinforcement is an average the interval of time varies from one reinforcement to the next - steady rate of responding - the longer the interval the lower the response rate
49
DRH
effective min number of responses occur in a given time period people tend to respond to a DRH schedule, as if it were an FI if level of responding is too high, lack of reinforcement will decrease response rate until, no response
50
DRL
rate of low responding reinforcement can be scheduled contingent up on a low rate of responding decreases responses reinforcement is reinforced with the last behavior of the interval
51
DRO
differential reinforcements of other behaviors getting rid of unwanted behavior reinforce only if there is an absence of a particular response in a specific period of time reinforces failure to do a specific behavior
52
DRI
differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior reinforces behavior that cannot be performed at the at the same time unwanted behavior rate lowers
53
Concurient Schedule
widely studied more of a choice and getting a pattern matching law
54
Tandem Schedule
must complete the requirements of each schedule in succession before reinforcement is given ex: task>>task>>task>> REINFORCEMENT
55
Chain Schedule
each separate schedule is signaled by an external | ex: driving and stoping at stop signs
56
Mixed Schedule
may obtain reinforcement during each individual schedule but schedules are presented sequentially and in random order ex: starting with the chores that I want to do then getting praise for each chore that I do
57
Multiple Schedule
each schedule is signaled by a cue, obtain reward during each schedule but they are presented in random and sequential order
58
Sidman Avoidance Schedule
a procedure where brief aversive stimuli are presented at fixed intervals in the absence of a response
59
Conditioned Reinforcers
Delayed, trace, simultaneous, backward, temporal, higher order
60
Types of Reinforcement
positive, negative, punishment and extinction
61
Types of Punishment
positive and negative
62
Punisher
this leads to fear
63
Two-process theory of punishment
involves both pavlovian and operant procedures | rat presses lever(CS) and receives shock