Chapter 5 Labour and Conservative governments Flashcards

(43 cards)

1
Q

Who took power of Britain in 1964?

A

Harold Wilson with Labour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When was Wilson and the Labour government’s national plan published?

A

September 1965

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many seats did labour win in majority in the 1966 general election?

A

96 seat majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When did the labour government devalue the £?

A

November 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When did President de Gaulle veto Wilson’s entry to the EEC?

A

November 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When was ‘In Place of Strife abandoned?

A

June 1969 in return for TUC pledge to monitor strikes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When was the Equal Pay Act enacted?

A

May 1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When did the Conservatives under Heath win the general election?

A

June 1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When did the Industrial Relations Act become law?

A

August 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When did the House of Commons vote in favour of British entry to the EEC with the conservatives?

A

October 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When did the miner’s strike begin and end?

A

Began in Jan 1972 (ends in Feb)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When did Britain join the EEC?

A

January 1973

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When did the second miner strike of this time begin and end?

A

Feb 1974, ends March

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When did the Conservatives lose the general election back to labour?

A

February 1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Did labour have a majority in 1974?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When did Labour win a small majority after not having one?

A

October 1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When was there a referendum on Britain’s membership in the EEC by labour government after Heath had brought Britain in?

A

June 1975

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When did Wilson resign as Prime Minister?

19
Q

Who replaced Wilson when he resigned?

A

James Callaghan

20
Q

When did Britain accept a loan from the IMF?

A

December 1976

21
Q

When was the Lib-lab pact and what was it?

A

March 1977. The Liberals agreed to support the Labour government in parliament.

22
Q

When was ‘winter of discontent’?

23
Q

When did the conservatives win back the general election at the end of the chapter?

24
Q

Why did Labour win the 1964 election?
Wilson’s leadership of the party.

A

Labour seemed much more united than it had been in either 1955 or 59. Divisions over Europe, nuclear weapons and nationalisation had not disappeared but Wilson was able to gloss over them by presenting Labour as modern, dynamic and progressive.

His election manifesto promised a range of policies to promote faster growth, full employment as well as improved welfare and health services, better housing and a programme of comprehensive education.

He pledged to ‘harness science to our economic planning’ and create a ‘Britain that is going to be forged in the white heat of this [technological] revolution.

Seemed to personify the new Britain that was progressive and talented people could come from modest backgrounds. Although he was a teacher of economics at Oxford he stressed how different from traditional Torys he was. He created the image of a Yorkshire grammar-school boy who was a football fan.

25
Why did the Labour Party win the 1964 election? How the electorate regarded the conservatives.
Cons had been in power since 1951 and many voters blamed them for the economic problems that became apparent in the 1960s. Tories didn't have control of unemployment, inflation, industrial unrest and growing regional wealth inequality. '13 wasted years' Cons seem out of touch, Douglas-Home was an aristocrat and 60 years old, Wilson was just 47. Sex scandals, electorate given the impression of an old-fashioned, self-indulgent elite.
26
Why did the Labour party win the 1964 general election? Revival of the liberal party
Conservative unpopularity in the 1960s benefitted Liberal as it was a way for middle-class voters to express protest but weren't prepared to vote for Labour. This was shown by by-election results such as Orpington in 1962, when a conservative majority of 14,700 was overturned by Liberal candidate with a 7,850 majority. Liberal revive brought more funding, publicity and new recruits. As a result able to contest more seats, only gained 3 in reality but doubled their votes. Took votes from conservatives and helped hand victory to labour in many seats.
27
Why did Labour win the 1964 election? Changes in British society in the 1950s.
Living standards improved in the 1950s, more money to spend made people, especially young, more independent and less willing to accept traditional authority. These attitudes encouraged by cultural change in the 50s, novels, plays and TV examined class structure and poked fun at politicians, also changed attitudes to sex. Grammar schools gave bright pupils from underprivileged backgrounds opportunities to go to uni and careers. A new climate where the young aspired to create a new, modern classless Britain run with professionalism and science. Labour benefit from this and were more popular with under 44s.
28
How close was the 1964 general election?
VERY. If a mere 900 voters in 8 critical constituencies had voted Tory not Labour the Cons would have won. The Labour got less votes than in 1959 so shows the election was more a rejection of conservatives than endorsement of labour. The opinion polls showed that Labour had a 20% lead after 1963 Profumo Affair but was whittled down by the election.
29
Why was the 1964 general election so close? Douglas-Home leadership
He was much more effective than he was expected to be. He appeared modest, decent and trustworthy where Wilson was more sly and cunning.
30
Why was the 1964 general election so close? Conservative tax cuts.
Chancellor of the Exchequer, Reginald Maulding, cut taxes in his 1963 budget. Although the cuts contributed to a trade deficit of $800 million, they also helped narrow the gap between parties as incomes rose and unemployed dropped from 900,000 in Feb 1963 to 300,000 by July 1964.
31
Why was the 1964 general election so close? Attitudes towards the Labour party
Many voters still dislike Labour and don't trust links to TUs and so strikes against the gov's pay policies weaken support. Internal divisions not resolved still, middle-class dislike commitment to nationalisation. Very few of their leaders had held office before and voters doubted their competence to deal with crises. Conservatives picked up midlands votes as immigration was a big issue.
32
What problems did Wilson face when he entered office?
-Only a majority of 4 seats. -Promises about modernising British society needed to be fulfilled. -Pressing foreign and colonial issues to be dealt with. -Senior figures talented but often dislike each other. -Economic situation was serious.
33
What important characteristics did Wilson display as PM?
-Highly intelligent, hard working with a memory for detail. -Optimistic, resilient, patient and cool in crises. -Kind, charming and generous. -Distrust of party ideology, preferring practical solutions. -A leader who sought compromise rather than conflict. -Acceptable to both wings of labour.
34
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? Navigating a small majority.
A majority of 4 presented great difficulties. In the March 1966 election, the government was returned with a 96 majority. Showed Wilson's leadership style worked, he avoided splits in the party. Labour appeared powerful and resolute. Wilson, exuding confidence and authority made Heath seem dogged and ponderous.
35
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? Transformation of British society.
Labour had promised to modernise society and enacted a series of reforms, some of which Wilson was not comfortable with but let more reform-minded members take charge, most notably Roy Jenkins, the home secretary. Major programme of social change that introduced many of the ideas we now take for granted such as race relation. BUT traditionalists outraged, laws on contraception, homosexuality and abortion encouraged promiscuous sex.
36
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? Race relations under social change
Many new arrivals from the commonwealth settled in less affluent areas, this was bad for Labour as immigration was unpopular. One reason was racial prejudice, but there was also fear it would lower wages. Due to this, the gov tightened rules on immigration in 1965 and 68. Race Relations Act attempted to tackle discrimination but enforcement methods were weal.
37
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? Education policy under social change
1965 Anthony Crosland, the education secretary replaced the system of grammar and secondary schools with comprehensive schools for children with all abilities. Led to controversy where grammar schools had been seen as an opportunity that had previously only been to private schools. Major expansion of university education. Introduction of Open University.
38
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? Foreign and colonial issues, Vietnam
Wilson believed that Britain's economic recovery and security depended on a close alliance with the USA. In April 1965, a few weeks after Johnson committed troops, Wilson told the commons that 'we have made absolutely plain our support of the American stand against communist infiltration in South Vietnam'. BUT, to appease left he didn't send troops, also criticised Johnson's bombing of N. Vietnam and in 1967 tried to broker peace. His actions annoyed Johnson but didn't go far enough to appease left.
39
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? Foreign and colonial issues, Southern Rhodesia
Wilson attempted to balance different sections of opinion in his handling of the illegal declaration of independence in November 1965 by the white minority government of Ian Smith in Southern Rhodesia, a British colony. Labour left and most commonwealth wanted gov to send troops to crush rebellion. Instead WIlson tried economic sanctions but these weren't working and so tried twice personal diplomacy. He proposed a settlement that would leave Smith in power if he agreed a majority rule would be put in place. This risked inflaming left-wing opinion, unity of labour and future of commonwealth. Smith's refusal let Wilson off the hook. Wilson's tactics were risky but there was no simple solution.
40
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? The common market
Wilson thought he could persuade Charles de Gaulle, who had vetoed the 1963 application, to change his mind. He failed, in 1967 the veto was repeated. Pro Europeans happy about application and anti-europeans were happy by the rejection.
41
How effective was Harold Wilson as Prime Minister? Management of the Labour cabinet.
Wilson was anxious to avoid internal squabbling that had weakened labour in the 50s and he hoped to achieve this by giving ministerial jobs to senior party figures from all shades of opinion, not just to his associates and supporters. BUT there were often quarrels. Cabinet minister Barbara Castle observed in her diary that 'We spend three-quarters of our time in these personal pro and anti intrigues instead of getting down to real jobs'. BUT this was common for all parties.
42
What economic difficulties were there in the 1960s?
43