Chapter 5 Part 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What is negligence

A

it deals with careless or reckless conduct rather than intentional conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the four basic elements to a negligence claim

A

Defendant has a duty to the plaintiff against unreasonable risks- Duty, Defendant fails to perform the duty-Breach, There is actual loss or damage to the plaintiff- Harm, A reasonably close connection between the defendant’s conduct and the plaintiff’s injury- Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Duty of Care - Duty in the element of negligence

A

A person should foresee that their conduct would create an unreasonable risk or harm to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Failure to Exercise Care - Breach in the element of negligence

A

Failure to do what the ordinarily prudent person would do under the same circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Injure or Harm in the element of negligence

A

Physical or mental harm like fright, humiliation, or emotional distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Causation in the element of negligence

A

A casual connection between the breached duty and the injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two types of causation that are required to maintain an action for negligence

A

cause in fact and proximate cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is cause in fact in the element of negligence

A

established by evidence showing that the complained-of act is the cause of the event that caused the injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is proximate cause in the element of negligence

A

The harm must be foreseeable (knowing the danger and harm it can cause to people) by the actor when he committed the negligence act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the defense to negligence

A

The assumption of the risk by the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s own negligence and superseding cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is assumption of risk

A

voluntary exposure to a known risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is contributory negligence

A

the failure of the plaintiff, the injured party, to exercise reasonable care, which contributes to the injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is comparative negligence

A

allows a proration of the damages resulting from the combined negligence of the parties. The plaintiff recovers, but only for the damages the defendant caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is moral hazard

A

under a simple negligence standard the people at risk have the incentive to take self-protective or loss-avoidance measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is superseding cause

A

Something occurs that breaks the causal connection required to have a negligence case (FIND EXAMPLE pg.161)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is strict liability in tort

A

liability without fault

17
Q

What was the reason the court created strict liability in tort

A

for cases involving “abnormal” or “ultra-hazardous” activities

18
Q

What does safety allow

A

it allows for the compensation of parties injured by unsafe products, and through market adjustments to unsafe products

19
Q

What was caveat emptor (beginning of product safety)

A

the buyer of the product was the one liable for injuries or harm if product was deemed dangerous

20
Q

What Is product liability based on negligence

A

when a supplier, such as a wholesaler, retailer, distributor, manufacturer, or other party in the supply chain, places a product the stream of commerce with inaccurate or inadequate labeling, or manufacturing or design defects or flaws

21
Q

If there is knowing express consent, assumption of the risk can still be used with what elements present

A

the plaintiff had knowledge of the facts making up the dangerous condition, making the plaintiff aware that the situation was dangerous, the plaintiff understood the nature and extent of the danger, and voluntarily undertook the dangerous activity

22
Q

What is express warranty

A

is created when a seller makes a guarantee to the buyer that the product/service being offered has certain qualities

23
Q

What is implied warranty

A

Warranties that arise due to the facts and situations of the case.

24
Q

What is implied warranty for fitness for particular purpose

A

occurs if a seller knows or has reason to know of a particular purpose for which some item is being purchased by the buyer. The seller then guarantees that the item is fit for that particular purpose

25
Q

What is strict liability

A

a defendant is liable when the plaintiff proves that the product is defective, regardless of the defendant’s intent.

26
Q

What is consumer expectations test

A

Consumers buy a product they have the right to expect that it is safe

27
Q

What are the four elements that the plaintiff must show to prove a strict liability case

A

Identifying the seller and the relationship between the product and the plaintiff’s injury, defective product and was substantial to the plaintiff’s harm, unreasonable danger, and defect existed when it left the manufacturer

28
Q

What are the two defenses of strict liability

A

abuse or misuse and assumption of the risk

29
Q

What is assumption of the risk

A

(1) had actual knowledge of the danger; (2) understood and appreciated the risks associated with such danger, and (3) voluntarily exposed himself to those risks.

30
Q

What are the five arguments to justify the use of the rule of strict liability

A

Consumers be give the maximum amount of protection from defects, only the producer can prevent dangerous and defective products, costs of duplicative lawsuits, since the manufacturers receive the sale they should responsible, and the manufacturer has more finances to be responsible for the injuries of their customers.

31
Q

What is the Restatement (Third) of Torts

A

it would create a one term of products liability (removing negligence, warranty, and strict liability) and divide the liability rules based on type of product, liability in design, and inadequate instructions or warnings

32
Q

What is market share liability

A

liability law that apportions liability against a set of defendants according to their respective market shares of sales of a harmful product during the period that the harm occurred

33
Q

absolute liability

A

full legal responsibility for damages or for an injury, without the need for proof and regardless of the degree of negligence or fault