Chapter 6- Central Contributions to Motor Control Flashcards
(43 cards)
**
open-loop control systems
you know the entirety of all movements you need to produce in advance
-instructions for a movement are structured in advance -> executive processing (brain) has a program/instructions to send to the effectors
-movements are executed without regard to the effects on the environment -> the effector carries out the program without possible modification
in open-loop control systems, is behavior sensitive to feedback?
NO
-no reference of correctness
is there a feedback component in open-loop control systems
NO
-once you start doing these movements, it doesn’t matter if you are doing them well or not
**
difference between open- + closed-loop control system
no feedback in open-loop
**
steps for open-loop control system
(input) ->
executive ->
(instructions) ->
effector ->
(output)
**
response-chaining hypothesis
-assumes a movement begins with a muscular contraction caused by an external/internal signal -> this generates a sensory response-produced feedback
-feedback is just stimulus information, serving as a trigger for the next contraction in the chain (every time you complete a contraction, that completion itself is what triggers the next muscle contraction within the list of instructions)
-continued until all contractions in a sequence are completed
-response could be in same or different limbs
another name for response-chaining hypothesis
reflex-chaining hypothesis
who created response (reflex)-chaining hypothesis
William James
**
deafferentation
method for interrupting the flow of sensory information to the spinal cord; involves the lack of afferent signals
-very common method for evaluating sensory information coming into system
-can be temporary or permanent
temporary deafferentation
-ex: local anesthetics injected at the dentist
-ex: blood pressure cuff- stops blood flow to a particular region so that it becomes numb + loss of sensation; once you release the cuff, regain sensation
permanent deafferentation
-dorsal rhizotomy
-sensory neuopathy
-joint replacements
**
dorsal rhizotomy
removal/cutting of dorsal roots but leaves the efferent intact
-subject is still able to do motor movements but doesn’t have sensory coming upstream
**
sensory neuropathy
complete/near-complete loss of sensory information due to regenerated afferent pathways
-can be caused by disease, due to issues with afferent pathways
**
joint replacements
removal of joint + joint capsule, providing no joint-receptor feedback
how can loss of feedback/sensory information affect us
can have consequences to our capability to move normally
do we always need feedback?
NO
-sometimes, when we are really good at a task, we don’t need feedback
**
internal model /motor program
a brain network that can adapt to practice + contain a skill representation
-basically, any time I do a movement I create a file + every time I do that movement AGAIN, I can pull out that file + reference it
-humans + animals have this
what does CNS use to control movement
internal model
-when I send instructions to muscles to do a movement, I also send copies of instructions to other parts of the brain -> the internal model will take that set of instructions sent to the brain to plan out trajectory
-this is why we get better at a movement with practice
why do we get better at movement with practice
internal model
Ian Waterman case study
19 year old male with flu-like virus which caused damage to dorsal nerves + therefore loss of proprioception
-he learned to move based on visual information to deliberately plan movements in response-chaining method
-he had to see his feet to walk- using this visual feedback even though he couldn’t sense things himself, he was able to control his locomotion
**
central control mechanisms
explain how movements occur even in the absence of sensory feedback
**
spinal preparation
spinal cord cut at a level below the brain so that supraspinal centers cannot influence lower ones
-stimulation shows efferent fiber activity, capable of producing a rhythmic output from motoneurons
**
half-center model
suggests interneurons alternatives stimulate flexor + extensor motor neurons due to neural circuitry producing oscillations via central pattern generators