Chapter 6: Sentencing Flashcards
Overview
1.1 The Sentencing Code
The ‘Sentencing Code’ is a consolidation of existing sentencing procedure law. It brings together
over 50 pieces of primary legislation relating to sentencing procedure into one single Sentencing Act 2020 (‘SA 2020’).
Parts 2 to 13 of the SA 2020 make up a code called the ‘Sentencing Code’ (the ‘Code’). Unless referring specifically to sections 1 or 2 of the SA 2020, it is acceptable to refer to either the
SA 2020 or the Code. As well as the Code, courts also refer to sentencing guidelines published by the Sentencing
Council.
1.2 Types of sentence
There are a variety of disposals available to a court when dealing with an offender; all of which meet, to a greater or lesser degree, the principles of sentencing. They fall into custodial and non-custodial sentences. One of the main advantages of the SA 2020 is that it brings the wide range of disposals together ‘under one roof’ as it were
1.3 Purposes of sentencing (adult)
When determining the proportionate sentence to be imposed, the court will have regard to the various purposes of sentencing. Section 57 SA 2020- In cases involving those aged 18 and over (at the date of conviction) the court must have regard to:
(a) The punishment of offenders,
(b) The reduction of crime (including its reduction by deterrence),
(c) The reform and rehabilitation of offenders,
(d) The protection of the public, and
(e) The making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences. The purposes are given equal weight though in a particular case some may be more important
than others
1.4 Approach to sentencing
The mechanics of how a court sentences an offender is essentially the same irrespective of which
court is dealing. The only key differences are:
* The availability of certain sentences; and
* The limits to the powers of the magistrates’ and youth courts.
In order to decide both the type and length of any particular sentence, the court must assess the seriousness of the case before it. To do so, it will refer to the sentencing guidelines.
1.5 Sentencing procedure
Sentencing happens once a defendant is convicted. This occurs either by the defendant entering a guilty plea or being found guilty after a trial.
The magistrates’ court, youth court and Crown Court are all courts of first instance with powers of sentence. It is important to appreciate the difference between the maximum sentence which can be imposed for a specific offence and the maximum sentence which can be imposed by a particular
court for that offence
1.5 Sentencing procedure
This means that statute also allows for defendants, where necessary and appropriate, to be committed for sentence to the Crown Court which has greater powers. Section 14 SA 2020 for example, provides that magistrates can commit an adult for sentence to the Crown Court for offences triable either way where greater sentencing powers are required.
1.6 Powers of the courts
The following tables summarise which courts can sentence depending on the type of offence involved:
* Summary only
* Either-way
* Indictable only
1.7 On what basis is the defendant being sentenced?
For the purposes of this section, let’s use a simple example. The defendant is charged with a single count of Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (s.47 Offences against the Person Act 1861). The prosecution alleges that he punched the complainant in the face twice. The complainant fell to the ground. The defendant is alleged to have kicked the
complainant twice in the ribs whilst the complainant remained on the ground
1.7 On what basis is the defendant being sentenced?
Let us assume that the defendant’s instructions are that he did assault the complainant, and he accepts that this did cause actual bodily harm, but that he takes issue with the facts asserted by the prosecution. If this is his position, he would need to:
* Enter a guilty plea, but on a written basis, the prosecution would indicate whether they viewed the basis as acceptable; if accepted
* The court will then proceed to consider whether this basis is an acceptable one; and
* The court will consider whether or not a Newton hearing is required.
1.8 Newton hearings
Where a defendant pleads guilty on a basis that will make a material difference to sentence, the
court must hold a Newton hearing to decide the factual basis upon which it should pass sentence (R v Newton).
What happens at a Newton hearing?
1.8 Newton hearings
In the magistrates’ court, a Newton hearing is presided over by magistrates or a District Judge much like a regular trial. In the Crown Court it takes place without a jury. This is one of the limited
number of occasions where a Crown Court Judge acts as the arbiter of both law and fact. A Newton hearing is an exception to the rule that where a defendant enters a guilty plea there is
no ‘trial’ phase to the process
1.8 Newton hearings
The prosecution makes an opening speech and calls evidence in the usual way and their witnesses can be cross-examined by the defence. The defendant is able to give evidence and call witnesses if they so wish. Both parties are entitled to address the judge by way of a closing speech.
At the conclusion of the hearing the court must decide whether the prosecution has proved its version of the facts beyond reasonable doubt. If it has, the defendant will be sentenced on the prosecution version of the facts. If it has failed to prove their factual basis to that standard, the
defendant will be sentenced on the defence version of the facts as set out in their basis of plea
1.8 Newton hearings
If the prosecution is able to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt and the defendant sentenced on their version of the facts, a further consequence for the defendant is that they lose
some of the credit that they receive for pleading guilty. The Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea guideline says that the reduction which would have been available at the stage of proceedings the plea was indicated should normally be halved. Where witnesses are called, it may be appropriate to further decrease the reduction. The rationale must be that the defendant has used up some court time that otherwise would have been saved due to their plea and/or that
witnesses who would have been spared from giving evidence due to their plea instead had to come to court and give evidence at the Newton hearing.
1.9 Totality
When sentencing for more than one offence, a court must consider what the total sentence should be and arrive at one that is just and proportionate. This is not as simple as adding the two (or more) sentences together, the judge will consider whether consecutive or concurrent sentences are more appropriate in the circumstances. Where the various offences arise out of the same facts it will usually be appropriate to pass concurrent sentences for each, and where they arise out of different facts, consecutive sentences are likely to be passed.
1.10 Deferring sentence
A court can defer sentence for up to six months, the idea being that the defendant is allowed this
time to prove to the court that D has either ‘changed’ or that the offence was an absolute ‘oneoff’ and thus allowing D the ability to present to the court at the end of the deferral period in a
much better light, and often, receive a lighter sentence as a result.
1.10 Deferring sentence
The deferral period cannot be extended save for where the magistrates’ court defers sentence for a period, at the end of which they commit to the Crown Court for sentence, the Crown Court then has the option of deferring for a further six month period.
1.11 Indications of sentence
There are two formal procedures for seeking an indication of sentence in the event of a guilty plea. One in each court:
1.11.1 Magistrates’ court
The offence is either-way and the court has accepted jurisdiction during the allocation process. At this stage, D is entitled ask for an indication of what their sentence would be were they to
remain in the magistrates’ court and plead guilty. The court does not have to give an indication of sentence but, if it does it can only say whether
the sentence would be a custodial or a non-custodial sentence. Only binding if D then pleads guilty.
1.11.2 Crown Court: Goodyear indication
D can ask for an indication of the sentence either before the PTPH or at any stage of the proceedings before the jury return their verdict. Before asking for an indication D must:
(a) Either accept the prosecution facts or a written basis of plea must be agreed by the parties
and the court
(b) Give clear instructions to their counsel that D wishes to ask for an advance indication of
sentence. The giving of an indication is discretionary and it remains the decision of the judge whether to
give one or not
1.12 Summary
This section considered the principles of sentencing contained in the Sentencing Act 2020:
* The purpose of sentencing
* Sentencing powers in both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court
* The purpose of Newton hearings.
* Totality of sentence
* Indications of sentence
2 Sentencing: Determining sentence
2.1 Seriousness
In order to decide on the appropriate sentence, the court will consider the Sentencing Code 2020
alongside any relevant sentencing guidelines. The court must determine the seriousness of the offence.
The starting point to determine seriousness is to consider culpability and harm.
Section 63 SA 2020: Where a court is considering the seriousness of any offence, it must consider
(a) The offender’s culpability in committing the offence, and
(b) Any harm which the offence (i) caused, (ii) was intended to cause, or (iii) might foreseeably
have caused.
2.1.1 Thresholds
Where appropriate the court must consider whether either statutory threshold has been passed to
justify imposing a custodial or community order.
Section 230 SA 2020:
(a) The court must not pass a custodial sentence unless it is of the opinion that:
(i) The offence, or
(ii) The combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it, was so
serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence’
Section 204 SA 2020:
(b) The court must not make a community order unless it is of the opinion that:
(i) The offence, or
(ii) The combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it, was serious enough to warrant the making of such an order.
2.1.2 Culpability
Culpability is essentially blameworthiness and is assessed with reference to the offender’s role, level of intention and/or premeditation and the extent and sophistication of planning.
The mere presence of a factor that is inherent in the offence should not be used in assessing culpability – so for example, intention to cause serious harm is a necessary element in a section 18 OAPA. What would increase culpability might be how the injuries were inflicted eg with a weapon.