Chapter 7 Juries: Facts And Finders Flashcards
(14 cards)
Types of offences
Summary, indictable, hybrid
Summary offence
Minor offence dealt with lower court, less severe penalties
Ex: public intoxication, minor theft
Indictable offence
Serious offence dealt in higher court, possibility of a jury, longer prison sentences
Ex: murder, sexual assault, robbery
Hybrid offence
Prosecuted either as summary or indictable, depending on circumstances
Ex: certain types of theft and assault
How jurors are selected in canada
Juries act: legislation that outlines the eligibility criteria for jury service and how prospective jurors must be selected
- community members receive jury summons
- preemptory challenge removed by billC-75
- challenge for a cause: remove potential juror based on specific reasons
Representativeness
For jury to be considered representative: must allow any eligible person from community opportunity to be in jury, random
- assists in selecting juries that will be favourable for the case
Impartiality
-jurors must set aside biases/prejudice and only use evidence
-must ignore any inadmissible evidence
-must have no connection to the defendant
Jury functions
- apply the law to a case and reach verdict
- wisdom of 12 rather than 1
- act as the conscience of the community
- protect against out-of-date laws
- increase knowledge about the justice system
How do we study juror/jury behaviour?
methodologies:
-post-trial interviews
-archival records
-simulation
-field studies
Simulation
-participants presented with simulated trial and render verdicts
-high internal validity
-limitations: fake cases w no consequences, undergraduate students, generalizability to real world questionable
Reaching a verdict - deliberation
Jury members discuss evidence privately among themselves to reach a verdict that is provided to the court
Jury decision-making models: mathematical
-jury makes set of mental calculations
-mathematical weight assigned to each piece of evidence
- not really used
Jury decision-making models: explanation
- evidence organized into coherent whole
- story model: create story structure integrates evidence, decide which story fits evidence best
- jurors decision making process is coherent with this approach
Listening to the evidence
Note-taking, asking questions