Chapter 9 Flashcards
(47 cards)
Why is lifelong learning a valuable asset?
In an age in which information is everything and knowledge is the key to success. According to management guru Peter Senge, the distinctive feature of successful companies is their ability to learn (Senge, 1990)
Knowledge
Is the stock of ideas, meanings, understandings, and explanations of how phenomena of interest are structured and relate to other phenomena.
Knowledge management
Is the process of managing knowledge – know-how and know-why – to meet existing and future needs.
Organisational learning
is the process of detection and correction of errors.
Learning
is the process of acquiring knowledge and capabilities in addition to those already known
Which four sources of knowledge are important, according to Fulop and Rifkin (1999)?
- Learning by doing. 2. Hearing stories. 3. Being exposed to popular accounts. 4. Being curious and doing research
Learning by doing
a manager can learn most when they are involved in the work
Hearing stories
story is a good format because it relates the core of an experience and takes the freedom to embellish it to make it more interesting. Stories can also communicate the message of how things are done in the organization
Being exposed to popular accounts
stories that are printed and communicated through management seminars as exemplary cases drawn from a great organizational culture
Being curious and doing research
well designed research and executed research drives out ignorance
Tacit knowledge
Knowledge sed to do things that you cannot necessarily articulate. Ex. riding a bike. It is a personal cognitive map that helps you - consciously or not – though routines, practices and processes.
Explicit knowledge
Knowledge consciously talked about and reflected on, usually elaborated, and recorded for learning. Consists of formalised, accessible knowledge that can be consciously thought, communicated, and shared.
Four major movements by which knowledge is shared? (Nonaka 1991)
Socialization, Combination, Internalization, and Articulation
Socialization
(The move from tacit to tacit): People implicitly learn codes of conduct and rules of behavior from other people without having to think too much about their meaning. “A good example are the rules of behavior in traffic: while the explicit traffic regulations and informal expectations in Ho Chi Min City and Hamburg seem similar on the surface, the tacit knowledge you need to master the traffic in those places could not be more different.
Combination
(The move from explicit to explicit): People combine ideas they are already well aware of. When the UK government issued an urgent industry ‘call to arms’ to help the NHS fill the projected shortfall in ventilators to respond to the COVID-19 crisis, the likes of McLaren, Airbus and Rolls Royce, among others, joined forces by combining their explicit engineering knowledge to increase the production capability of ventilator devices from 55 per week to 1500. None of the organizations that formed the Ventilator Challenge UK consortium could have achieved this on their own.
Internalization
(The move from explicit to tacit): Things that you learned once become a pattern in your repertoire; you begin to take them for granted and you forget that you learned them in the first place. Newcomers are often a valuable source of insight because they are not accustomed to these routines.
Articulation
(The move from tacit to explicit): Through articulating and sharing within the organization, new knowledge becomes accessible and a part of official processes. It is very important for management to attempt to organize and manage tacit knowledge, and to try to transform elements of tacit knowledge into organizationally explicit knowledge – an idea that marks the birth of the concept of knowledge management.
Tacit vs. Explicit knowledge
Management tries to learn from tacit knowledge. Developing this resource and aligning it effectively with change have become the domain of what is known as organizational learning. Innovation occurs through learning. Organizations that are inward focused have an optimal pattern of internal knowledge reuse that does not differ markedly from that of more outward-looking firms. However, inward-looking firms are more likely to become embedded in what they already know. Inward-looking firms are more likely to become embedded in what they already know, exploiting rather than exploring knowledge.
Why should not only managers who should know what is happening?
Other members of the organization might also know and might even be able to think of better ways of doing things. The organization might learn from the tacit knowledge, short cuts, experience, and improvements introduced by its members. This can give them a competitive advantage
Why is the hierarchy of power the exact reverse image of the hierarchy of ideas?
Employees who meet customers on a daily basis and gain their feedback often know more about present practices and potential new innovations than management teams embroiled in internal meetings and planning processes.
What forms the character of an organization?
Its routines, processes, practices, and stories.
What is typically assumed when someone knows something?
That they can stop learning about it. (This is not true)
What was Nokia’s problem?
It already knew a lot, which made new learning seem like a waste of time. However, after the market and technology had changed, it was too late to learn the lessons that the competition had mastered. Nokia failed because it knew too much about what it did and had insufficient knowledge about competitors, technologies, and customers.”
“The consumer response to Nokia’s phones became increasingly negative between 2008 and 2010 because the improvements in product quality seemed modest compared with its challengers’ offerings.
What is the “competency trap”?
It occurs when an organization does something well and learns more about it until it becomes so expert that it does not see the limits of its achievements. It cannot adapt in response to the changes in its environment because it has become so focused on doing things its way, even when it becomes evident that the old routines are no longer working. Example: Nokia. It failed because it relied on its competencies. Its competencies made it blind to what it did not know. What top managers failed to appreciate and vehemently rejected was that software innovations were outflanking their existing knowledge base. In common parlance, they were about to expire as the future consigned their technology to the junkyard.