Chapter risk 6 Flashcards
(60 cards)
what sort of view is taken on risk in this chapter?
We want to quantify risk in monetary units so that the risk of a position can be interpreted as how much buffer capital is required to provide sufficient protection agaisnt undisirable outcomes.
normal to see variance being used a a measure of risk. is it good?
No.
There are several downsides of using variance as a measure of risk.
1) variance doesnt differ between good and bad outcomes.
2) variance is not monetary value
how do we represent a portfolio in this chapter
as a random variable
sicne we measure portfolios as random variables, what do we need to do to measure the risk of the portfolio?
Consider the porbaiblity distribution of the portfolio
elaborate on using portoflio random variable’s probability distribution
Key is that it will differ in various contexts.
An asset manager will consider the entire porbability distribution and wiegh up scenarios.
A risk controller will focus on the negative side only.
For instance, a risk controller may find some portfolio acceptable, while the asset manager does not if the returns are not there.
what appears to be the keyword in this chapter
Acceptable
We are looking for acceptable portfolios
why not compare probability distributions against each other?
Very difficult to do.
It is much easier to have a single number used for comparison. this is one of the motivations for using a risk measure that computes a monetary value number.
define a risk measure
a function, p, so that p(X) assigns a real number to each value of X, and p(X) gives the capital requirement that we need to invest in risk free asset to consider the position as acceptable.
when is p(X) acceptable
if p(X)<=0, acceptable
if p(X) > 0, not acceptable.
elaborate on the good properties of risk measures
There are 6 properties.
1) Translation invariance
2) Monotonicity
3) Convexity
4) normalization
5) Positive homogeneity
6) Subadditivity
elaborate on translation invariance
Refers to the fact that id we add cash to the portfolio, then the capital requirement for an accetpable portfolio should be reduced by this same amount.
p(X+cR_0) = p(X) - c
elaborate on monotonciity
if the value of a portfolio is smaller than the value of another portfolio, then this must be shown wit hthe measure.
if X1 < X2:
then
p(X1) < p(X2)
elaborate on convexity
This is a risk sharing property saying that if we invest in something together, then the risk of the position when considered toegther is smaller than or equal to the risk of adding the two risks evaluated independently.
elaborate on normalization
p(0) = 0
elaborate on positive homogeneity
p(kX) = kp(X)
for all positive k (thus positive homogeneity)
if we double the size of the position, we double the risk, basically
elaborate on subadditivity
risk sharign.
p(X1 + X2) = p(X1) + p(X2)
how can we achieve subadditivity?
convexity together with positive homogeneity implies subadditivity
what is a coherent risk measure?
if we have:
translation invariance,
monotonicity,
positive homogeneity,
subadditivity
then we have a coherent risk measure.
A coherent risk measure is also convex.
what is a convex risk measure
must satisfy
translation invariance
monotonicity
conveixty
what is mean-variance risk measure
mean variance is a risk measure that balance expected value and variance. technically it use standard deviation. it is multiplied by a number of standard deviations so one can itnerpret it as being a balance between expected return and a certain multiplicative of standard deviations, and this balance must be negative in order to produce an acceptable portoflio. Therefore, the expected value term is negative, and the variance term is positive.
what is bad about mean variance risk measures
no monotoncitiy. This makes is non-convex.
what can we say about risk measure of X when X is normally distributed?
any risk measure that is translation invriant and positively homogeneous must look like a mean-variance measure, for some constant c where c = R_0 p(Z).
this is becasue we can write a normally distributed variable purely by using hte mean and standard deviation of it.
So, if we know that X is normally distributed, and we assume the basic axioms, then the risk measure must satisfy the mean-variance version.
mean variance risk measure does not have monotonicity. when is this not a big deal?
mistinerpreted the book, it isalways a big deal
what is VaR
Value at risk.
Value at risk is the smallest amount of capital that ensures you can cover your loss X with at least alpha probability.