Chapters 1 - 3: Unit 1 Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Introduction and the Meaning of ‘Law’

A

Defining ‘Law’: Difficult to define precisely due to its diverse types and continuous development.

Function of Law: Sets standards of acceptable behaviour. Generally aligns with societal views and incorporates moral considerations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legal Rules vs. Social Rules & Law vs. Morality

A

Legal Rules: System of rules governing daily life. Enforced (fines, prison)

Social Rules: Conventions influencing conduct. NOT legally enforced (e.g., queuing)

Law & Morality: Morality underpins law (e.g., murder, rape). Immoral but Legal: Adultery, tax loopholes. Legal but Not Universally Immoral: Soft drugs, speeding slightly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Private v Public law:

A

Private Law:
Concerns: Individuals/companies relationships.
Enforced by: Individuals in court.
Example: Customer claims vs. manufacturer.

Public Law:
Concerns: Individuals vs. State relationship.
Enforced by: The State (e.g., criminal prosecution, planning enforcement).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Civil vs. Criminal

A

Criminal: Individual vs. Community/State, objective is to Punish (prison, fines), Prosecutor (State: Police/CPS) vs. Defendant, “Beyond reasonable doubt”.

Civil Law: Individual vs. Individual, objective is to Remedy/Compensate (damages, injunctions), Claimant vs. Defendant, “On the balance of probabilities”,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Doctrine of Stare Decisis (Judicial Precedent):

A

Means “to stand by things decided.” Earlier decisions of higher courts are binding on lower courts in similar cases. This created consistency and predictability in the legal system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Equity:

A

Arose as a response to the rigidity and harshness of Common Law.

“Equity looks on that as done which ought to be done.”

Equitable Remedies: Discretionary court orders (not awarded as of right, unlike common law damages). Injunctions, specific performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Process of Becoming an Act:

A

Green Paper, White Paper, Bill, Stages of a Bill: First Reading, Second Reading (debate), Committee Stage (detailed scrutiny), Report Stage (amendments considered), Third Reading, then progresses to the other House, Royal Assent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types of Legislation:

A

Public Bills: Affect the public as a whole (e.g., Stalking Protection Act 2019). Most common type.

Private Bills: Affect specific persons or localities (e.g., an Act to allow a new railway line in a specific area).

Consolidating Legislation: Re-enacts law from several existing statutes into one new statute, without making material changes (e.g., Insolvency Act 1986). Simplifies existing law.

Codifying Legislation: Gathers all the law on a specific topic (from common law, custom, and existing statutes) into one comprehensive new statute, potentially changing pre-existing law (e.g., Theft Act 1968). Aims for a complete statement of the law on that topic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Delegated (Subordinate) Legislation

A

Definition: Law made by bodies other than Parliament (e.g., government ministers, local authorities, the Crown) under the authority of an “enabling” or “parent” Act of Parliament.

Statutory Instruments (SIs): Most common form of delegated legislationxdff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Structure of the Court System

A

Hierarchy (from top):
- Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (final court of appeal for UK, replaced House of Lords in 2009 by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 for judicial independence/transparency).

  • Court of Appeal (Senior Courts of England and Wales)
    Criminal Division
    Civil Division
  • High Court (Senior Courts of England and Wales)
  • Queen’s Bench Division
  • Chancery Division
  • Family Division
  • Crown Court (Senior Courts of England and Wales)
  • Magistrates’ Courts
    County Court (single court established 2013, “hearing centres”)
  • Family Court (established 2013 by Crime and Courts Act 2013, consolidated family jurisdiction).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Classification of Courts - Criminal vs. Civil

A

Criminal Courts:
- Objective: Decide guilt/innocence, punish wrongdoers.
- Examples: Crown Court (almost exclusively criminal), Magistrates’ Courts (primarily criminal, some civil).

Civil Courts:
- Objective: Decide disputes between parties, grant remedies (usually compensation).
- Examples: County Court (only civil).

Courts with BOTH Civil & Criminal Jurisdiction: Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, Family Court, Magistrates’ Courts (limited civil).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Classification of Courts - Trial vs. Appellate

A

Trial Courts (Courts of First Instance):
Function: Hear cases for the very first time. Rule on issues of fact and law.

Examples: County Court, Family Court, High Court (dual role), Crown Court, Magistrates’ Courts.

Appellate Courts:
Function: Reconsider application of legal principles to cases already heard by a lower court. May also reconsider disputed facts in some cases.
Purpose: Correct errors of fact, law, or procedure; assist in development of law.

Examples: Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court (dual role), Crown Court (hears appeals from Magistrates’).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Overview of Civil Procedure (Money Claims)

A

Stage 1: Pre-commencement

Stage 2: Commencement of proceedings

Stage 3: Interim matters

Stage 4: Trial

Stage 5: Post-trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when are cases appealed?

A

Permission is asked to the court that made the decision, or if not a written one to the appelate court. It must have a prospect of success and be on a point of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

“Leapfrog Appeals”:

A

Direct appeals from the High Court to the Supreme Court are possible in a handful of cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Criminal Courts of First Instance: Magistrates’ Courts

A

Trial of summary offences (minor offences, must be dealt with here). Mode of trial procedure for either-way offences (decide if case goes to Magistrates’ or Crown Court).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Indictable Only Offences:

A

Most serious (e.g., murder, robbery). Can only be tried in the Crown Court.
If defendant pleads not guilty, trial is by judge and jury. Jury judges facts, judge directs on law.

19
Q

Criminal Appeals System - General Principles

A

Public policy dictates greater freedom to appeal due to the serious damage to reputation and potential deprivation of liberty associated with criminal convictions.

20
Q

Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)

A

ECJ Jurisdiction:
Ensuring uniform application of EU law (e.g., preliminary rulings on interpretation/validity of Treaties/EU acts).
Actions against Member States for failing Treaty obligations.

21
Q

European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

A

Purpose: Uphold human rights, democracy, and rule of law in Europe.
Jurisdiction: Hears applications concerning alleged violations of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) by Member States.
Can be inter-state cases (e.g., Cyprus v Turkey) or individual petitions (e.g., Hirst v UK on prisoner voting rights).

22
Q

Necessity of Interpretation:

A

Language used in statutes is not always clear or unambiguous.
Societal changes and new technologies mean statutes must apply to unforeseen issues (e.g., Internet shopping for Sale of Goods Act 1979, jet skis for Merchant Shipping Act 1995).

23
Q

Drafting tradition is “all-embracing,”

A

aiming to cover every eventuality, thus using general terms. Many words have more than one meaning, leading to ambiguity if context isn’t clear (e.g., “woman without her man is nothing” vs. “woman; without her, man is nothing”).

24
Q

Corkery v Carpenter [1951]

A

: Court held a bicycle was a “carriage” for the Act’s purpose. (Illustrates crucial impact of word meaning).

25
26
Quintavalle Case Example (Purposive Approach in Action)
Decision (House of Lords): Adopted a purposive interpretation. The Act's aim was to protect and regulate all embryos created outside the human body, creating a comprehensive system of regulation. Applied the "always speaking" principle: the statute could be construed in light of new scientific knowledge to apply to current conditions.
27
Three Rules:
The Literal Rule The Golden Rule The Mischief Rule
28
The Literal Rule
Words are given their plain, ordinary, literal meaning. Applied even if the result is harsh, undesirable, or appears contrary to Parliament's intent. However, Can defeat Parliament's true intention and lead to absurd results or injustice (London & North Eastern Railway Co v Berriman [1946] - Widow denied compensation.)
29
The Golden Rule (Narrow Sense)
An adaptation of the literal rule. Apply ordinary meaning unless it leads to an absurd or totally obnoxious result. If words have two meanings, choose the one that avoids absurdity.
30
31
The Golden Rule (Wider Sense)
Meaning: Used to avoid a result "obnoxious to public policy," even when words have only one apparent meaning. Example: Re Sigsworth [1935] Issue: Son murdered his mother. Under intestacy rules (Administration of Estates Act 1925), he was legally entitled to inherit as "issue." Golden Rule: Court held he could not inherit, effectively writing an exclusion into the Act, to uphold the public policy principle that a murderer should not benefit from their crime.
32
The Mischief Rule
Aims to ascertain the legislator's intention by identifying the "mischief" (harm or wrong) that the statute was intended to remedy. Corkery v Carpenter [1951] (revisited from Card 2) Mischief: Injury/disorder from drunken persons in charge of transportation. Application: Bicycle was a "carriage" as it contributed to this mischief.
33
Interaction of Rules:
Different rules can lead to different results from the same facts
34
The Purposive Approach
Judges look at the reasons why the statute was passed and its overall purpose, even if it requires departing from the ordinary meaning of words. Now commonly used for all types of UK statutes, not just EU-related ones.
35
Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA)
"So far as it is possible to do so, primary and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect in a way which is compatible with the Convention rights." If compatibility is not possible, the court may make a declaration of incompatibility (s.4 HRA).
36
Rules of Language - Noscitur a Sociis
A word's meaning is derived from the surrounding words in a list or phrase. The context helps define the word. In "dogs, cats, hamsters and gerbils," "cats" would imply domestic cats, not leopards, due to the company of other domestic pets.
37
Rules of Language - Eiusdem Generis
If a general word follows two or more specific words, the general word is interpreted to apply only to items of the same type or kind as the specific words. Any gun, pistol, hanger, cutlass, bludgeon or other offensive weapon" (Vagrancy Act 1824). Did a piece of broken glass count as "other offensive weapon"? Broken glass was not an "other offensive weapon." (Note: "whatsoever" after "weapon" would have made it inclusive).
38
Rules of Language - Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius
The mention of one or more specific things may be taken to exclude others of the same type that are not mentioned. Poor rate on "lands, houses and coal mines." Did it apply to other types of mines? The specific mention of "coal mines" excluded other types of mines.
39
Aids to Interpretation - Intrinsic Aids
Aids found within the statute itself that help interpret its meaning. Not Normally Used: Marginal notes (not debated in Parliament). Example: Chandler v DPP [1964] – "spying" marginal note ignored for "espionage" (Official Secrets Act 1911).
40
Aids to Interpretation - Extrinsic Aids
Aids found outside the statute itself Interpretation Acts: General definitions for common legislative words (e.g., Interpretation Act 1978, s.6: masculine includes feminine, singular includes plural). Dictionaries: Useful when a word has no specific legal meaning, especially for the literal approach. Statutes, hansard
41
Common Presumptions:
Against alteration of the common law (unless expressly stated). Against retrospective operation of statutes (especially in taxation/criminal law), unless explicitly stated (e.g., War Crimes Act 1991). Against criminal liability without guilty intention (mens rea). Example: Sweet v Parsley [1970] – Teacher not guilty of drug offence if unaware of cannabis cultivation in her rented house, applying presumption of mens rea. Against deprivation of individual liberty (ambiguity in criminal statutes interpreted in citizen's favour). Against deprivation of property or interference with private rights. Against binding the Crown (unless clearly stated).