Chapters Flashcards
(139 cards)
Scientific Enterprise
-Social scientific inquiry generates knowledge through logic and observation
-Three key aspects
~Theory
*Theory precedes observation
*Observation proceeds theory
~Data Collection
*Quantitative
*Qualitative
~Data Analysis
-Goal
~Discovering what is
*NOT what should be
**Social Phenomenon
~CANNOT settle debates on value
*Stay neutral
*No value judgments
*EX:
**CANNOT determine GOOD parole officers
Finding Trends in Social Behaviors
-Social science aims to find patterns of regularity in social life
~What are the trends that exist for behaviors
-Social regularities represent PROBABILISTIC patterns
~Behavior trends can inform policy
*Probable listing for a group
**The likelihood of something happening within that range that is given (overall group)
Different Avenues for Inquiry
-Ideographic Explanation
~Explain a single situation
*NOT great for research examinations and studies
-Nomothetic Explanation
~Explain a class of situations or events
~Explain efficiently
*SETTLE for partial explanation
~Avoids evaluation of individual cases
-Social Science typically focuses on NOMOTHETIC approach
~Distingushes the activities of criminal justice researchers from the daily routines of most criminal justice practitioners
*EX:
**Parole decisions
-Researchers want to figure out how it affects the overall population
-TWO APPROACHES TO INQUIRY
~QUALITATIVE
Non-numerical
**Greater richness of meaning
**Text, images, or conversations to help get a deeper meaning of the research
~QUANTITATIVE
Numerical
**Carries the focusing of attention and specification of meaning
**Being specific on what the researcher is counting and how something does or doesn’t change over time
*BOTH are useful and legitimate
**Choose based on the topic or combine aspects of both
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning?
-Inductive Reasoning
~Specific to General
*Looking at a few key elements and making an overall assumption that all of the elements are the same
**Logically, the idea is true
**However, this may or may not be accurate
~Specific argument to a general conclusion
~Used in mathematics
~Uses conjecture
*A hypothesis that has NOT been proven
-Deductive Reasoning
~General Argument to a specific conclusion
*Logically true
*Realistically true
Hypothesis Testing Video
If you are only getting answers that end in “yes,” it is true; try to find possibilities that can disprove the hypothesis that can give more information than the yes responses
Ethical Issues in Criminal Justice Research
-Ethics
~Moral principles governing human behavior
*Often associated with right and wrong
-Ethical concerns
~Consideration of appropriate behavior
*Outcome informed by professional guidelines
-Particular considerations for social science research
~Especially criminal justice research
-How does the research affect the overall benefits and decline of the study, and is the behavior appropriate without jeopardizing the population by being overpowered by the benefit that could come?
-Behavioral Guidelines
~What are appropriate behaviors, and what are inappropriate behaviors potentially harming others in said actions
-What are the ethics of giving or not giving an intervention that the researchers are testing?
Main Ethical Issues in CRJ Research
-Human Rights Violations
~Excessive physical and/or emotional harm caused by scientific research
-Utilitarianism
~Ask the question, do the potential benefits of the research outweigh the potential costs to research participants
-Scientific Integrity
-Occurs when a researcher falsifies or distorts the data or methods of data collection or plagiarizes the work of others
Human Rights Violations
-No Harm to Participants
~Must consider harm participants might experience
~Types of harms
*Psychological harm
**Remembrance of traumatic experience
*Physical harm
**Collecting information from active criminals
*Social harm
**NOT receiving intervention
~DILEMMA
*Balancing potential benefits against possible harm
**Possible harm be justified by the potential benefits of the study
**Still arbitrary thought
-VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION
~CJ Research often intrudes into people’s lives
*Asks them to reveal what is generally unknown
**Criminal activity
~Participation must be voluntary
*VOLUNTARY CONSENT
**People should never participate in research unless they explicitly and freely agree to participate
*INFORMED CONSENT
**A statement, usually written that explains aspects of a study to participants and asks for their voluntary agreement
*SPECIAL POPULATIONS
**Specific regulations exist for certain populations, such as juveniles and prisoners
~HOWEVER, voluntary participation can threaten generalizability
*What about the people who didn’t participate?
-PROTECTING PARTICIPANT IDENTITY
~Anonymity
*When a researcher cannot identify a given piece of information with a given person
~Confidentiality
*A researcher can link information with a subject but promises not to do so publicly
~Safeguard
*Replace names/addresses with IDs
*Securing data on locked rooms or servers
*Specify that info will not be disclosed to third parties
*Get a waiver for signed consent
-DECEIVING SUBJECTS
~Generally considered unethical
*PASSIVE DECEPTION (OMISSION)
**Withholding or omitting of information
**Omitting information about the study purpose
ACTIVE DECEPTION (commission)
**Presenting of misinformation about the study to participants
**Use of confederates
JUSTIFIED DECEPTION
**Significant benefits that outweigh the risks to the participants
**MUST consider all alternatives to deception
~IF deception is used, participants must receive a debriefing
*Provides a full description of the true study purpose after complete
Human Rights Violations Studies
-Nazi Medical War Crimes (1939-1945)
~Medical Research involving human beings has created a lot of potential pitfalls that have led to tragedies in the last century
-Tuskegee Syphilis Study (Alabama)
~The study was stopped in 1973 by the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare only after its existence was publicized and it became a political embarrassment
~In 1977, under mounting pressure, President Clinton apologized to the study subjects and their families
-Trouble in the Tearoom
~Laud Humphrey’s class study, Tearoom Trade, was a study of “Sexual deviance”
~Two part Research
*COVERT OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF IMPERSONAL SEX
**Among men in public restrooms
**Adopted “Watch Queens”
*“HEALTH STUDY”
**Involved the men who tearoom participants
**And other men
~Tearoom participants were unaware of the research purpose
*No information consent
**Sexual deviance
*Researchers tracked down men’s home info via license plates
-The Stanford Prison Experiment (Aug. 15-21, 1971)
~Ad in the paper for college males to see the psychological effects of prison life
*75 participants were tested for mental health issues, and only 24 passed the normal mental health part
**The men split into two roles: the CO or the inmate
~Conclusion
*Situational factors, not dispositional ones (personality) are more important in shaping behavior
**However, the study has been fiercely criticized for its ethics and validity
-Milgram Experiment (1963)
~Research to improve the memory
*Two participants each had a different role
**If the person answering the questions wrong, they would have to increase the voltage and send a shock to the other participant
~The point of the research was to see if standard Americans should portray similar acts that the Nazis did during the Holocaust. The finding showed that with an authority figure standing over them had similar effects as the Holocaust.
Guideline and Safeguards
-Helsinki Declaration
~The World Medical Association (WMA) has developed the Declaration of Helsinki as a statement of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
*Addresses research on identifiable human material and data
*The first version was adopted in 1964 but has been updated six times since
-The Belmont Reports (1979)
~National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
*Respect for persons
*Beneficence
*Justice
-Code of Professional Ethics
~The American Psychological Association (2010) Code of Ethics
*Reflects different professional roles of psychologists in research, clinical treatment, and educational context
~Other professional ethics standards
*Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Ethical Standards
*American Society of Criminology Code of Ethics
*US Department of Health and Human Services
*American Bar Association Code of Professional Responsibility
-Institutional Review Boards (IRB)
~Also known as an INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEE (IEC) or ETHICAL REVIEW BOARD (ERB) is a committee that has been formally designed to approve, monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving humans to protect the rights and welfare of the research subjects.
*MUST have at least five members
*Members must have enough experience, expertise, and diversity
*IRB should have members who are familiar with research using vulnerable populations
-IRB Committee Guidlines
~IRB should include both men and women
~Members of the IRb must not be all of the same profession
~IRB must include one scientist and at least one non-scientist
*NOT defined in the terms or the regulations
~IRB must include at least one person who is not affiliated with the institution or the immediate family of a person affiliated with the institution
*These are commonly called “Community Members”
~IRB members may not vote on their own projects
~IRB may include consultants in their discussions to meet requirements for expertise or diversity, but only actual IRB members may vote
-Responsibilities of the IRB
~MUST collect and review all study material and procedure
*Informed consent is obtained and appropriately documented
*Adequate provisions for monitoring data collection to ensure safety of the study participants
*Participant privacy and confidentiality is protected
*Risks to study participants are minimized
~Many social research study desigs are regarded as exempt
*Exempt means that research proposals do not have to be subject to full IRB reviews
Causation in the Social Sciences
-As social scientists, we seek to explain the causes of some phenomenon
~Crime
*Procucutors looking at what cases to take to court and which to offer a plea deal
~Focus of explanatory research
-Cause in social science is inherently probabilistic
~Certain factors make crime/delinquency more or less likely
*Poverty is associated with crime rates
~Cretain factors exacerbate inequality
Criteria for Causality
-Correlation
~Empirical relationship between variables
*One outcome goes up, and the other goes up
**Offense severity and the level of punishment
*One outcome goes up, and the other goes down
-Temporal order
~Cause precedes effort
-Non-spuriousness
~No alternative explanation
-Any relationship that satisfies all these criteria is causal
Correlation
-Correlation is a measure of association that tests whether a relationship exists between two variables
-Statistically speaking
~It indicates both the strength of the association and its direction
~Denoted by r(-1 to +1)
-FOR CJ RESEARCH, what factors are related to crime? Criminal justice outcomes?
-There is a statistical correlation over months of the year between ice cream consumption and the number of assaults. Does this mean ice cream manufacturers are responsible for crime?
~NO; the correlations occur statistically because the hot temperatures of the summer cause both ice cream consumption and assaults to increase
*CORRELATION does NOT imply CAUSATION in this example
Temporal Order
-The cause must have occurred before the effect
~How is police culture formed?
*People self-select into law enforcement based on traits and preferences
*Police work affects officer’s outlook on the world
Non-Spuriousness
-It must be established that the IV, and only the IV, was the cause of changes in the DV
~Confouds must be ruled out
~Positive correlation between ice cream consumption and frequency of assaults
*Confound = temperature
Validity and Causal Inference
-When we make a cause-and-effect statement, we are concerned with its validity
~Internal validity
~External validity
-Ensure that claims are TRUE and VALID
~Be aware of threats to validity
Other Types of Validity
-Construct Validity
~Does our test measure what we intend to measure?
*Implicit Association Test
-Statistical Conclusion Validity
~Can we determine a statistical relationship between variables?
~DId we detect a relationship by chance?
*Issue with small samples
Summary of Validity
-The 4 types of validity threats can be grouped into two categories
~Bias
*Internal Validity
*Statistical Conclusion Validity
~Generalizability
*Construct Validity
*External Validity
Units of Analysis
-What or who is studied
~Individuals
~Groups
~Organizations
~Social artifacts
-Provides data for analysis
~Informs our conclusions
Study Designs
-Cross-Sectional Design
-Longitudinal Design
~Trend
~Cohort
~Panel
-Retrospective Design
Cross-Sectional Design
-Provides a snapshot of the variables included in the study
~At one particulate point in time
~Can be used to APPROXIMATE time dimension
*Can’t look at long-term data
*Simple: collecting one data point over time and it is cost-effective
**However, it is limited in temporal overviews
Longitudinal Designs
-Collects data over long periods
~Moves from T1 to T2
*Collects data repeatedly over time
**Asking the same questions in different periods with the same people
**Gives a better picture of the effects that could change within a study
Retrospective Designs
-Asks people to recall their past for approximating observations over time
~Statr with T2 and asks about T1
-Limitations
~People have faulty memories
~People lie
~Records may be missing or inaccurate
Conceptions and Concepts
-Clarifying abstract mental images is an essential first step in measurement
~Crime = Murder, Gangs, Police, DUI, etc.
-Why does the phrase “justice” require further conceptualization?
~