Chapters Flashcards

(139 cards)

1
Q

Scientific Enterprise

A

-Social scientific inquiry generates knowledge through logic and observation

-Three key aspects
~Theory
*Theory precedes observation
*Observation proceeds theory
~Data Collection
*Quantitative
*Qualitative
~Data Analysis

-Goal
~Discovering what is
*NOT what should be
**Social Phenomenon
~CANNOT settle debates on value
*Stay neutral
*No value judgments
*EX:
**CANNOT determine GOOD parole officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Finding Trends in Social Behaviors

A

-Social science aims to find patterns of regularity in social life
~What are the trends that exist for behaviors

-Social regularities represent PROBABILISTIC patterns
~Behavior trends can inform policy
*Probable listing for a group
**The likelihood of something happening within that range that is given (overall group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Different Avenues for Inquiry

A

-Ideographic Explanation
~Explain a single situation
*NOT great for research examinations and studies

-Nomothetic Explanation
~Explain a class of situations or events
~Explain efficiently
*SETTLE for partial explanation
~Avoids evaluation of individual cases

-Social Science typically focuses on NOMOTHETIC approach
~Distingushes the activities of criminal justice researchers from the daily routines of most criminal justice practitioners
*EX:
**Parole decisions

-Researchers want to figure out how it affects the overall population

-TWO APPROACHES TO INQUIRY
~QUALITATIVE
Non-numerical
**Greater richness of meaning
**
Text, images, or conversations to help get a deeper meaning of the research

~QUANTITATIVE
Numerical
**Carries the focusing of attention and specification of meaning
**
Being specific on what the researcher is counting and how something does or doesn’t change over time

*BOTH are useful and legitimate
**Choose based on the topic or combine aspects of both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning?

A

-Inductive Reasoning
~Specific to General
*Looking at a few key elements and making an overall assumption that all of the elements are the same
**Logically, the idea is true
**However, this may or may not be accurate
~Specific argument to a general conclusion
~Used in mathematics
~Uses conjecture
*A hypothesis that has NOT been proven

-Deductive Reasoning
~General Argument to a specific conclusion
*Logically true
*Realistically true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hypothesis Testing Video

A

If you are only getting answers that end in “yes,” it is true; try to find possibilities that can disprove the hypothesis that can give more information than the yes responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ethical Issues in Criminal Justice Research

A

-Ethics
~Moral principles governing human behavior
*Often associated with right and wrong

-Ethical concerns
~Consideration of appropriate behavior
*Outcome informed by professional guidelines

-Particular considerations for social science research
~Especially criminal justice research

-How does the research affect the overall benefits and decline of the study, and is the behavior appropriate without jeopardizing the population by being overpowered by the benefit that could come?

-Behavioral Guidelines
~What are appropriate behaviors, and what are inappropriate behaviors potentially harming others in said actions

-What are the ethics of giving or not giving an intervention that the researchers are testing?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Main Ethical Issues in CRJ Research

A

-Human Rights Violations
~Excessive physical and/or emotional harm caused by scientific research

-Utilitarianism
~Ask the question, do the potential benefits of the research outweigh the potential costs to research participants

-Scientific Integrity
-Occurs when a researcher falsifies or distorts the data or methods of data collection or plagiarizes the work of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Human Rights Violations

A

-No Harm to Participants
~Must consider harm participants might experience

~Types of harms
*Psychological harm
**Remembrance of traumatic experience
*Physical harm
**Collecting information from active criminals
*Social harm
**NOT receiving intervention

~DILEMMA
*Balancing potential benefits against possible harm
**Possible harm be justified by the potential benefits of the study
**Still arbitrary thought

-VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION
~CJ Research often intrudes into people’s lives
*Asks them to reveal what is generally unknown
**Criminal activity

~Participation must be voluntary
*VOLUNTARY CONSENT
**People should never participate in research unless they explicitly and freely agree to participate
*INFORMED CONSENT
**A statement, usually written that explains aspects of a study to participants and asks for their voluntary agreement
*SPECIAL POPULATIONS
**Specific regulations exist for certain populations, such as juveniles and prisoners

~HOWEVER, voluntary participation can threaten generalizability
*What about the people who didn’t participate?

-PROTECTING PARTICIPANT IDENTITY
~Anonymity
*When a researcher cannot identify a given piece of information with a given person

~Confidentiality
*A researcher can link information with a subject but promises not to do so publicly

~Safeguard
*Replace names/addresses with IDs
*Securing data on locked rooms or servers
*Specify that info will not be disclosed to third parties
*Get a waiver for signed consent

-DECEIVING SUBJECTS
~Generally considered unethical
*PASSIVE DECEPTION (OMISSION)
**Withholding or omitting of information
**Omitting information about the study purpose
ACTIVE DECEPTION (commission)
**Presenting of misinformation about the study to participants
**
Use of confederates
JUSTIFIED DECEPTION
**Significant benefits that outweigh the risks to the participants
**
MUST consider all alternatives to deception

~IF deception is used, participants must receive a debriefing
*Provides a full description of the true study purpose after complete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Human Rights Violations Studies

A

-Nazi Medical War Crimes (1939-1945)
~Medical Research involving human beings has created a lot of potential pitfalls that have led to tragedies in the last century

-Tuskegee Syphilis Study (Alabama)
~The study was stopped in 1973 by the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare only after its existence was publicized and it became a political embarrassment
~In 1977, under mounting pressure, President Clinton apologized to the study subjects and their families

-Trouble in the Tearoom
~Laud Humphrey’s class study, Tearoom Trade, was a study of “Sexual deviance”
~Two part Research
*COVERT OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF IMPERSONAL SEX
**Among men in public restrooms
**Adopted “Watch Queens”
*“HEALTH STUDY”
**Involved the men who tearoom participants
**And other men

~Tearoom participants were unaware of the research purpose
*No information consent
**Sexual deviance
*Researchers tracked down men’s home info via license plates

-The Stanford Prison Experiment (Aug. 15-21, 1971)
~Ad in the paper for college males to see the psychological effects of prison life
*75 participants were tested for mental health issues, and only 24 passed the normal mental health part
**The men split into two roles: the CO or the inmate
~Conclusion
*Situational factors, not dispositional ones (personality) are more important in shaping behavior
**However, the study has been fiercely criticized for its ethics and validity

-Milgram Experiment (1963)
~Research to improve the memory
*Two participants each had a different role
**If the person answering the questions wrong, they would have to increase the voltage and send a shock to the other participant
~The point of the research was to see if standard Americans should portray similar acts that the Nazis did during the Holocaust. The finding showed that with an authority figure standing over them had similar effects as the Holocaust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Guideline and Safeguards

A

-Helsinki Declaration
~The World Medical Association (WMA) has developed the Declaration of Helsinki as a statement of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
*Addresses research on identifiable human material and data
*The first version was adopted in 1964 but has been updated six times since

-The Belmont Reports (1979)
~National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
*Respect for persons
*Beneficence
*Justice

-Code of Professional Ethics
~The American Psychological Association (2010) Code of Ethics
*Reflects different professional roles of psychologists in research, clinical treatment, and educational context
~Other professional ethics standards
*Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Ethical Standards
*American Society of Criminology Code of Ethics
*US Department of Health and Human Services
*American Bar Association Code of Professional Responsibility

-Institutional Review Boards (IRB)
~Also known as an INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEE (IEC) or ETHICAL REVIEW BOARD (ERB) is a committee that has been formally designed to approve, monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving humans to protect the rights and welfare of the research subjects.
*MUST have at least five members
*Members must have enough experience, expertise, and diversity
*IRB should have members who are familiar with research using vulnerable populations

-IRB Committee Guidlines
~IRB should include both men and women
~Members of the IRb must not be all of the same profession
~IRB must include one scientist and at least one non-scientist
*NOT defined in the terms or the regulations
~IRB must include at least one person who is not affiliated with the institution or the immediate family of a person affiliated with the institution
*These are commonly called “Community Members”
~IRB members may not vote on their own projects
~IRB may include consultants in their discussions to meet requirements for expertise or diversity, but only actual IRB members may vote

-Responsibilities of the IRB
~MUST collect and review all study material and procedure
*Informed consent is obtained and appropriately documented
*Adequate provisions for monitoring data collection to ensure safety of the study participants
*Participant privacy and confidentiality is protected
*Risks to study participants are minimized
~Many social research study desigs are regarded as exempt
*Exempt means that research proposals do not have to be subject to full IRB reviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Causation in the Social Sciences

A

-As social scientists, we seek to explain the causes of some phenomenon
~Crime
*Procucutors looking at what cases to take to court and which to offer a plea deal
~Focus of explanatory research

-Cause in social science is inherently probabilistic
~Certain factors make crime/delinquency more or less likely
*Poverty is associated with crime rates
~Cretain factors exacerbate inequality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Criteria for Causality

A

-Correlation
~Empirical relationship between variables
*One outcome goes up, and the other goes up
**Offense severity and the level of punishment
*One outcome goes up, and the other goes down

-Temporal order
~Cause precedes effort

-Non-spuriousness
~No alternative explanation

-Any relationship that satisfies all these criteria is causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Correlation

A

-Correlation is a measure of association that tests whether a relationship exists between two variables

-Statistically speaking
~It indicates both the strength of the association and its direction
~Denoted by r(-1 to +1)

-FOR CJ RESEARCH, what factors are related to crime? Criminal justice outcomes?

-There is a statistical correlation over months of the year between ice cream consumption and the number of assaults. Does this mean ice cream manufacturers are responsible for crime?
~NO; the correlations occur statistically because the hot temperatures of the summer cause both ice cream consumption and assaults to increase
*CORRELATION does NOT imply CAUSATION in this example

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Temporal Order

A

-The cause must have occurred before the effect
~How is police culture formed?
*People self-select into law enforcement based on traits and preferences
*Police work affects officer’s outlook on the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Non-Spuriousness

A

-It must be established that the IV, and only the IV, was the cause of changes in the DV
~Confouds must be ruled out

~Positive correlation between ice cream consumption and frequency of assaults
*Confound = temperature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Validity and Causal Inference

A

-When we make a cause-and-effect statement, we are concerned with its validity
~Internal validity
~External validity

-Ensure that claims are TRUE and VALID
~Be aware of threats to validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Other Types of Validity

A

-Construct Validity
~Does our test measure what we intend to measure?
*Implicit Association Test

-Statistical Conclusion Validity
~Can we determine a statistical relationship between variables?
~DId we detect a relationship by chance?
*Issue with small samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Summary of Validity

A

-The 4 types of validity threats can be grouped into two categories

~Bias
*Internal Validity
*Statistical Conclusion Validity

~Generalizability
*Construct Validity
*External Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Units of Analysis

A

-What or who is studied
~Individuals
~Groups
~Organizations
~Social artifacts

-Provides data for analysis
~Informs our conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Study Designs

A

-Cross-Sectional Design

-Longitudinal Design
~Trend
~Cohort
~Panel

-Retrospective Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Cross-Sectional Design

A

-Provides a snapshot of the variables included in the study
~At one particulate point in time
~Can be used to APPROXIMATE time dimension
*Can’t look at long-term data
*Simple: collecting one data point over time and it is cost-effective
**However, it is limited in temporal overviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Longitudinal Designs

A

-Collects data over long periods
~Moves from T1 to T2
*Collects data repeatedly over time
**Asking the same questions in different periods with the same people
**Gives a better picture of the effects that could change within a study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Retrospective Designs

A

-Asks people to recall their past for approximating observations over time
~Statr with T2 and asks about T1

-Limitations
~People have faulty memories
~People lie
~Records may be missing or inaccurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Conceptions and Concepts

A

-Clarifying abstract mental images is an essential first step in measurement
~Crime = Murder, Gangs, Police, DUI, etc.
-Why does the phrase “justice” require further conceptualization?
~

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Operationalization Choice
-Operationalization ~The process of developing operational definitions *How can we measure the concept? *Must determine what might work as a data-collection method -Measurement ~Assigning numbers or labels to units of analysis to represent the conceptual properties
26
Summarizing the Process
-Conceptualization -Conceptual Definition -Operational Definition -Measurements
27
Levels of Measurements
-Qualitative ~Nominal *Aren't numbers or can be put in any order ~Ordinal *Follows strict rules and is organized by an order -Quantitative ~Interval *Does not have a true zero or zero is meaningless **Temperature ~Ratio *Has a true zero **Lengths
28
Criteria for Measurement Quality
-The key standards for measurement quality are RELIABLE and VALIDITY ~Consistency
29
Tests for Reliability
-Test-retest methods ~Make the same measurement more than once *Should expect the same response both times -Interrater Reliability ~Compare measurements from different raters *Initial measurements -Split-half Method ~Make more than one measure of any concept *See if each measures the concept differently
30
Test for Validity
-Face Validity ~On its face, does it seem valid? ~Does it jibe with our common agreements and mental images? -Criterion-related validity ~Whether your variable relates to another in the logically expected direction -Content validity ~Does the measure cover the range of meanings included in the concept?
31
What is an Experiment?
-Research method in which ~Conditions are controlled ~So that 1 or more independent variables ~Can be manipulated to test a hypothesis ~About a dependent variable;e -Allows ~Evaluation of causal relationships among variables ~While all other variables are eliminated or controlled
32
Choosing Independent Variables
-Experimental Group ~Group of subjects exposed to the experimental treatment -Control Group ~groups of subjects exposed to the control condition ~Not exposed to the experimental treatment ~May receive placebo -Experimental Treatments ~Alternative manipulations of the independent variable being investigated
33
Design Type
-Between Subjects ~Dependent measures taken one time ~Data are independent -Within Subjects ~A "repeated measures" design ~Dependent measures taken multiple times ~Data are dependent -Mixed ~Between and within
34
Selecting Subjects
-Steps ~Decide on the target population *Who to recruit? ~Decide distribution of participants across groups *How to assign participants? -Cardina RULE ~Ensure that groups are as similar as possible *Randomization or "Random Assignment"
35
Experiments and Causal Inference
-Experiments potentially control for many threats to the validity of causal inference -Experimental design ensures ~Empirical correlation exists ~Cause precedes effects ~No spurious third variable -However, threats to validity still exists
36
Controlling Confounds
-Randomization ~Groups should be identical with respect to all variables except the experimental treatment -Blinding ~Technique used to control subjects knowledge of whether or not they have been given the experimental treatment -Constancy of Conditions ~Only the Independent Variable varied, while all else is controlled
37
Treats to External Validity
-Experiments often conducted under carefully controlled conditions ~Reduces internal validity threats ~Increases issue of generalizability -How do we know that the findings generalize to ~Other populations? ~The real world?
38
Variation in the Classical Experimental Design
-Quasi-Experimental Design ~When randomization isn't possible for legal or ethical reasons ~Introduces internal validity threats -Includes "natural" experiments ~Moratorium on the death penalty
39
Alternative Approaches
-Surveys -Qualitative Interviews -Field Observations -Secondary Data
40
Academic Freedom
-A guarantee that researchers are free to examine all topics and discuss all ideas without any restrictions, threat, or interference from outside the scientific community
41
Scientific Integrity
-Legal Liability ~Research may expose themselves to criminal liability by *Failing to repot observed criminal activity to the police *Engaging in participant observation studies where crimes are committed -Reporting of Research ~Researches DO NOT FABRICATE DATA *Fraud = an explicit effort to falsify or misrepresent data ~IF they discover significant errors in their published data, they take reasonable steps to CORRECT SUCH ERRORS in a correction, re-traction, erratum, or other appropriate publication means *Error = an unintentional mistake in design or analysis ~They do not present portions of another's work or data AS THEIR OWN, even if the other work or data source is cited occasionally *Plagiarism -Safeguards Against Fraud ~Citations for related ideas and research ~A safeguard against fraud is PEER REVIEW, which takes place when a researcher submits a research article for publication ~REPLICATION is repetition of a research study using the same basic procedures used in the original to test the accuracy ~Emphasis on successful experiments *File drawer bias **A tendency to publish positive results but not to publish negative or nonconfirmatory results *Promotes questionable research practices (QRPs) *Selective reporting of dependent variables *Adding more participants than planned *Failing to report all independent variables ~Growing call for per-registration: Publishing hypothesis and methods before data collection *Prevents HARKing ("hypothesizing after results are known") *Improves transparency
42
Empirical
-From experience -Social science is said to be empirical when knowledge is based on what we experience
43
Methodology
-The study of methods used to understand something; the science of finding out
44
Variables
-Logical groups of attributes ~The variable "gender" includes the attributes of "female" and "male"
45
Replication
-Repeating a research study to test the findings of an earlier study, often under slightly different conditions or for a different group of subjects
46
Theory
-A systematic explanation for observed facts and laws that describe and predict
47
Intersubjective Agreement
-Norm of science whereby different researchers studying the same problem arrive at the same conclusion
48
Paradigm
-A fundamental model or frame of reference that we use to organize our observation and reasoning
49
Grounded Theory
-A type of inductive theory based on (grounded in) field observation
50
Ethical
-Conforming to the norms or standards of a group
51
Informed Consent
-Agreement to participate in research after being informed about goals, procedures, and potential risks
52
Special Populations
-Groups such as juveniles and prisoners who require special protections if they are research subjects
53
Validity
-Whether statements about cause or measures are correct
54
Validity Threat
-Possible sources of false conclusions about cause or measurement
55
Units of Analysis
-The things-what or whom-being studied in a research project
56
Cross-sectional Studies
-Data collected at a single time point
57
Longitudinal Studies
-Data collected at multiple time points
58
Concept
-Words or symbols in language that we use to represent mental images
59
Conceptualization
-The mental process of making fuzzy and imprecise notions, such as concepts, more specific and precise
60
Conceptual Definition
-The work definition of a concept or term
61
Operational Definition
-A statement specifying what operations should be performed to measure a concept
62
Reliability
-Consistency -Obtaining the same results when measuring something more than once
63
Classical Experiment
-Research design with three components ~Pre and posttest ~Experimental and control groups ~Random assignment to group
64
Control Group
-Subjects in an experiment who do not receive the experimental treatment
65
Experimental Group
-Subjects in an experiment who receive the experimental treatment
66
Quasi-experiment
-Research design that includes most, but not all, elements of an experimental design
67
Time-series Design
-A type of quasi-experimental design where changes in a dependent variable are monitored over some time period
68
Case Study Approach
-Construct Validity ~Multiple sources of evidence ~Establish chain of causation ~Member checks -Internal Validity ~Pattern-matching ~Time-series analysis -External Validity ~Replicate through multiple case studies
69
Sampling Error Video
-Random Samples ~Even the best random samples are going to be different from the true population -Sampling Error ~Occurs when a random sample is taken rather than observing every subject in a population *Any sample size over 1,000 participants only lowers the error by one percent. **The only way to get near zero error would be to study everyone in that population, but that is not possible due to financial difficulties and the amount of data
70
Confidence Intervals
-Inference ~The conclusion based on the sample from a population -Taking different samples of the same population will show the sampling error or Variation Due to Sampling -Confidence Intervals ~The mean for the population lies between the samples of said population *Use a range to find the mean of a population -Greater variation in a population leads to a wider confidence interval ~More variation = wider confidence interval -Small samples vary more from each other and have less information, which leads to wider confidence intervals
71
Sampling
-The process of selecting observations -Why Sample? ~Learn something about a large group without having to study every member of that group ~Improve data quality *Obtain in-depth information about each subject rather than superficial data on all ~Want to minimize the number of things we examine or maximize the quality of our examination of those things we do examine ~When is sampling unnecessary? *The number of things we want to sample is small *Data is easily accessible *Data quality is unaffected by the number of things we look at ~Elements *Kind of thing the researcher wants to look at
72
The Logic of Probability Sampling
-Enables us to generalize findings ~Oberved cases *Larger unobserved population -Samples must be representative of the variations that exist among us ~Representative *Each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected into the sample ~"One spoonful can reflect the taste of the whole pot if the soup is weel-stirred" George Gallup
73
Conscious and Unconscious Sampling Bias
-Conscious Bias *When the sample is not fully representative of the larger population from which it was selected
74
Probability Theory and Sampling
-Sample Element ~Who or what are we studying -Population ~Whole group -Population Parameter ~The value for a given variable in a population -Sample Statistic ~Description of a given variable in the sample *Use sample statistics to make estimates or inferences about population parameters
75
Sample
-Target Population -Study Population -Sample -Sample is a smaller (but hopefully representative) collection of units from a population used to determine truths about that population *Gives results with known that can be calculated mathematically -The sampling frame is the list from which the potential respondents are drawn ~Registar's office, class rosters ~UCR, NCVS
76
Estimating Sampling Error
-Sampling Error ~Any difference between the characteristics of a sample and the characteristics of the population from which the sample is drawn
77
Confidence Levels and Intervals
-Two key components of sampling error ~Confidence levels ~Confidence intervals
78
Sampling Distribution Summary
-Random selection permits the researcher to link findings from a sample to the body of probability theory to estimate the accuracy of those findings -All statements of accuracy in sampling must specify both a confidence level and a confidence interval -The researcher must report that he or she is x percent confident that the population parameter is between two specific values
79
Simple Random Sampling
-Randomly selecting samples from a larger population -Advantages ~Estimates are easy to calculate ~Simple random sampling is always an equal probability approach -Disadvantages ~Sampling frame large, this method can be impractical ~Minority subgroups of interest in the population may not be present in the sample in sufficient numbers for the study
80
Systematic Sampling
-Elements in the total list are chosen (systematically) for inclusion in the sample ~List of 10,000 elements, we want a sample of 1,000; select every tenth element ~Choose the first element randomly -Advantages ~Sample easy-to-select ~ A suitable sampling frame can be identified easily ~Sample evenly spread over the entire reference population -Disadvantages ~Sample may be biased if hidden periodicity in population coincides with that of selection
81
Stratified Sampling
-Frame can be organized into separate "strata" ~Each stratum is then sampled as an independent sub-population ~Individuals randomly selected from the stratum -Advantages ~Ensures proportionate representation in the sample ~Adequate representation of minority subgroups of interest can be ensured -Disadvantages ~Sampling frame of the entire population has to be prepared separately for each stratum ~May require a larger sample than other approaches *Not always feasible
82
Multistage Cluster Sampling
-Used for difficult-to-sample populations ~Involves the repetition of two basic steps *Listing *Sampling -Advantages ~Cuts down on the cost of preparing a sampling frame ~This can reduce travel and other administrative coasts -Disadvantages ~Sampling error is higher for a simple random sample of the same size
83
Non-probability Sampling
-What about situations when it is impossible to select a probability sample? ~Nonprobability sampling can be used -Non-probability samples used when ~The population parameters are unknown ~The study population is difficult to find -Cannot generalize to larger population
84
Convenience Sampling
-Use results that are easy to get
85
Snowball Sampling
-Researchers recruit initial subjects ~Initial subjects recruit additional subjects who recruit additional subjects
86
Study Methods
-Interviewed 38 female officers of varying background ~Technique of snowball sampling -Open-ended questions designed to examine female officers' identification with police and gender roles ~Perceived distinctiveness from male counterparts ~How citizens view them ~They see themselves as masculine or feminine -Transcripts analyzed from emerging themes, concerns, and phrases that were presented by participants ~Discourse analysis
87
Findings
-Women bring distinctive characteristics to the task of policing compared with male counterparts ~Example *More empathetic; better communicators -Citizens see them more as police officers rather than as women ~But other did note that some comment on their appearance -Common were comparisons to other female police officers ("othering")
88
Purposive sampling
-The researcher chooses the sample based on who they think would be appropriate for the study ~Used primarily when there is a limited number of people who have expertise in the area being researched
89
Choosing a Sampling Technique
Is it desirable to sample at all, or can the whole population be used? Is it important to generalize to a larger population? ~Political preference polls Do you have the access and ability to perform probability sampling? -Major considerations ~Methods ~Theory ~Practicality ~Ethics
90
Types of Sampling
-Population refers to the whole, whereas sample is a smaller group within the population -Biased Samples ~Occurs when one or more parts of the population are favored over others *Voluntary Response Sample **Consists of people who have chosen to include themselves *Convenience Sample **Only included people who are easy to reach -Good Sample (Unbiased Sample) ~One that is representative of the entire population ~Gives each "thing" an equal chance of being chosen -Unbiased Sample ~Stratified Random Sample *Divide the group into stratum (people of similarities) and then do a SRS ~Multistage Sampling *Use a combination of two or more SRS ~Simple Random Sampling (SRS) *Similar to putting names in a hat and asking those to be in the research
91
Survey Research
-Common mode of observation in ~Sociology ~Political Science ~Criminal Justice Research -Self Reports ~Dominant method for studying the etiology of crime
92
Survey Research Topics
-Perceptions and Attitudes ~To learn how people feel about crime and CJ Policy -Counting Crime ~Asking people about victimization and criminal activity *Counters problems of data collected by police -Targeted Victim Surveys ~USed to evaluate policy innovations and program success
93
Guidelines for Asking Questions
-How questions are asked in the single most important feature of survey research ~Open-Ended *Respondent is asking to provide his or her answer ~Closed-Ended *Respondents select an answer from a list **Question range strongly disagree to strongly agree -Need a mix of open-ended and closed-ended questions for surveys -Make Items Clear ~Avoid ambiguous questions *DO NOT ask "double-barreled" questions *Emphasize the 5 W's **Who **What **Where **Why **When -Short Items are Best ~Respondents like to read and answer questions quickly -Avoid Biased Items and Terms ~DO NOT ask questions that encourage a certain answer *"How would you rate Michael Jordan's legendary career?" -Vary the response options ~Multiple choice ~Rank order ~Open-ended
94
Additional Guidelines
-Give mutually Exclusive Choices ~What is your age? *0-10 *10-20 *20-30 *30-40 *40+ **Error is those who fall into two categories because they are 10, 20, 30, or 40 ~ What type of vehicle do you own? *Van *SUV *Sedan **The error is that it does not give cars, trucks, motorcycles, hatchbacks, etc. -Use unbalanced scales carefully ~What is your opinion of Crazy Jim's auto-repair *Pretty Good *Great *Fantastic *Incredible *The Best Ever **Error only listing the positive attributes, not giving options for negative feedback
95
Don't Start From Scratch
-National Crime Victimization Survey -California Healthy Kids Survey -Center for Disease Control -Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey -Survey Monkey Questionnaire Templates -American Association for Public Opinion Research -General Social Survey -Existing Research *Peer Reviewed
96
Three Modes of Survey Distribution
-Self-administered questionnaires ~Can be home-delivered, mailed, or computer-based ~Issues with response rates -In-Person Interview Surveys ~Typically achieve higher response rates than mail surveys (80-85% is considered good) ~More costly, less efficient -Telephone Surveys ~Saves money and time, provides safety to interviewers, and is more convenient ~But it is challenging to recruit respondents
97
Purposeful Conversation
-Qualitative Interview ~Is an interactive between an interviewer and a respondent *Interviewer has a general plan of inquiry, including topics to be covered -Key Features ~Helps research specific populations ~Understand the subject's perspective ~Must consider researcher positionality
98
Interviewing Topics
-Firsthand accounts of their impressions and their lived experiences ~Exploring the defense attorney's justification for defending the guilty -Understand how people feel about their roles and identities ~Interviewing incarcerated fathers about fatherhood -Explores embeddedness in a "scene" ~Understanding the role of women within Brooklyn drug markets
99
Kinds of Qualitative Interviews
-Type Based on INTERVIEW SCHEDULE ~The structure of the interview that may have predetermined topical areas, questions, and PROBES -Types ~Structured ~Semi-structured ~Unstructured -The interview schedule will influence how in-depth and interactive your interviews should be
100
Focus Groups Interviews
-Bring people together for a guided topic
101
Note Potential Interview Issues
-Number of issues ~Double Barrel questions
102
Additional Considerations
-Build Rapport ~Consider appropriate attire, language, and location -Probes ~You can use *An attention probe **Lean in *A continuation probe **Nod *Clarification probe **Ask the respondent to clarify *Follow-up questions -Gaining access to participants ~Establish your role *Determine if you are an insider or outsider **May need to establish your identity as a researcher **May require a sponsor or "in" ~Compensation might be necessary
103
Application
-How would you use surveys or interviews to answer your research questions?
104
Literature Review Expectation
-Include an INTRODUCTION to the literature review ~General findings *One Paragraph -Synthesis of existing research ~By theory, methods, and/or conclusions *DO NOT DO study one, study two, study three found this *MAKE connections between the studies (similarities and differences between the studies) -Outline the limitations or challenges of this particular area of research ~WHAT IS MISSING? *One paragraph -Need for the paper ~2-3 pages ~5 Peer-reviewed articles and/or books *Sources after 2010 *Use in-text citations and references (APA guidelines)
105
Sampling
-Selecting some units of a larger population for study
106
Probability Sampling
-Sampling in which the probability that an element will be included in a sample is known
107
Population Parameter
-The value for a given variable in a population
108
Sample Statistic
-A summary characteristic of a sample used to estimate a population parameter
109
Sampling Distribution
-The range of sample statistics we will obtain if we select many samples
110
Sampling Frame
-A list or quasi-list of elements in a population that is used to select a sample
111
112
Field Research
-Encompasses two different methods of obtaining data ~Direct observation ~Asking questions -May yield qualitative and quantitative data -Benefits ~Helps generate hypotheses for future research ~Provides a comprehensive perspective ~Especially appropriate for natural settings
113
Recording Observations
-Videotaping, photographing, or voice recording ~May raise ethical or bureaucratic issues -Structured Observations ~Observers mark closed-ended forms *Produces numeric measures -Field Notes ~Observations are recorded as written notes *Requires re-writing immediately after observations
114
Ethnography -The Purpose
-Researcher embeds into the setting of interest for the purpose of gathering detailed data about ~Culture ~Symbols ~Processes ~Membership Boundaries -Studying social life in its natural setting
115
Ethnography -The Process
-A question or concern is identified for study -A group to study is identified ~Typically small and purposively selected -Permission to study the group is obtained -The researcher observes the group ~Must choose membership role -Take extensive note -Analyze data
116
Analyzing Data
-Asking questions about your data ~What are people doing? *What are they trying to accomplish? ~How exactly do they do this? *What specific means and/or strategies do they use? ~How do members talk about, characterize, and understand what is going on? ~What assumptions are they making? ~What do I see going on here? -What did I learn from these notes? -What themes or outcomes are present?
117
Discussion
-How could you use ethnography to answer your research? ~How would you gain access to your group? ~What role will you choose? Why? ~What would you look to observe? ~How would you record those observations?
118
Ethical Dilemmas in Ethnography
-Researchers may expose themselves to criminal liability by ~Failing to report observed criminal activity to the police ~Engaging in participant observation studies where crimes are committed
119
Strengths and Weaknesses
-Strengths ~Provide great depth of understanding ~More appropriate to measure behavior than surveys ~Can supplement other data -Weaknesses ~Generalizability *Findings may be population-specific ~Low reliability ~Probability samples cannot normally be drawn
120
Secondary Data Analysis -Introducation
-Agency records data, and content analysis do not require direct interaction with research subjects ~Data from agency records *Agencies collect a vast amount of crime and criminal justice data ~Content Analysis *Researchers examine a class of social artifacts **Typically written documents ~Secondary Analysis *Analyzing data previously collected
121
Agency Records Topics
-Most commonly used in descriptive or exploratory studies -Center on the important links between perceptions of crime problems, individual behavior, and criminal justice policy -Types of agency records ~Published studies ~Nonpublic Agency Records ~New Data Collected by Agency Staff
122
Units of Analysis in Criminal Justice Data
-Criminal Activity ~Incidents ~Crime Violated ~Victims ~Offenders -Apprehension ~Arrests ~Offenders ~Charges ~Counts -Court Activity ~Defendants ~Filings ~Charges and Counts ~Cases ~Apperances ~Dispositions ~Sentence -Corrections ~Offenders ~Admission ~Returns ~Discharges
123
Potential Limitations
-Virtually all Cj records-keeping is a social process: "Social Production of Data" ~Records reflect decisions made by CJ personnel as well as actual behavior by juveniles and adults ~Discretion factors into record-keeping -Potential for clerical error increases with the volume of data
124
Secondary Analysis
-Data collected by other researchers are often used to address new research question -Advantages ~Cheaper, faster, benefit from work of skilled researchers -Disadvantages ~Data may not be appropriate to your research question *Least useful for evaluation studies
125
What is Content Analysis?
-Analysis of the contents of communication -Technique that allows us to study human behavior indirectly through analysis of communications ~Textbooks, newspapers, Essays, Magazines, Articles, Cookbooks, Songs, Political Speeches, Novels, Advertisements, and Pictures -Appropriate uses ~Obtain descriptive information ~Analyze observable/interview data ~Test hypothesis ~Check other research findings
126
Steps
-Develop a research question -Define important terms (Operationalisation) -Determine the method of sampling and unit of analysis -Formulae coding categories -Analyze Data -Conclude and Report
127
Sampling in Content Analysis
-Population ~Totality of artifacts we want to say something about -This is often more difficult than it seems ~All issues of the Reno Gazette over a period of a year? ~All coverage of terrorism in the elite press? -We can analyze a census or we can sample ~The same sort of sampling techniques used for surveys can be applied here *Random v. non-random sampling *Many non-random samples chosen for theoretical as well as convenience reasons
128
Importance of Categorization
-All studies must cover (code) descriptive information into categories ~Deductive *Researcher determines categories before analysis begins ~Inductive *The researcher becomes familiar with the descriptive information collected and allows the categories to emerge as the analysis continues -Major coding categories ~Manifest *Refers to the specific, clear, and surface contents **Words, pictures, images, and such that are easily categorized ~Latent *Refers to the meaning underlying what is contained in a communication ~Both *Combination
129
Advantages and Disadvantages of Content Analysis
-Advantages ~Unobtrusive ~Easy* -Disadvantages ~Limited to analysis of communications ~Difficult to establish validity
130
Era of Evidence-Based Policy
-Evaluation Research ~Process Evaluation ~Impact assessment -Problem Analysis -Evaluation Research + Problem Analysis = Policy Intervention
131
Evidence-Based Research Organization
-Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy -Vera Institute of Justice -Justice Reinvestment Initiative -Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation Center
132
The Policy Process
-Policy Demands ~Goal -Policy Input ~Resources -Policy Output ~Deliverables -Policy Impact
133
Design for Program Evaluation
-Randomized Evaluation Design ~Randomly assigning participants to conditions ~Avoid selection bias -However, MUST Consider ~Case Flow *Represents the process through which subjects are accumulated into experimental and control groups ~Treatment Fidelity *Whether an experimental intervention is delivered as intended **Related to reliability -Quasi-Experimental Design ~In some cases, random assignment is impossible or unethical ~Alternative approaches can be used, including *Time series analysis, non-equivalent groups, and cohort design -However, challenges exist ~Lack of built-in control for selection (internal validity threat) ~Potential issues with history and instrumentation effects
134
Problem Analysis
-Main Steps ~Carefully define a specific problem ~Conduct in-depth analysis of causes ~Search for solutions ~Evaluate the effectiveness of solutions -Coupled with SCIENTIFIC REALISM, can help public officials find alternative courses of action ~Consider the role of context
135
Ethical and Political Considerations
-Challenges to applied research ~Must consider the views of other stakeholders, including *Political officials *Community members *Law enforcement/corrections officers -Stakeholders may operationalize "success" differently *May have conflicting perspectives on goal and success
136
Methods Proposal
-For this paper, you should ~Re-state your research question *State your hypothesis ~Describe how you are operationalizing your variables *Must be measurable ~Describe the methods for obtaining the data *Interviews, observations, surveys, etc. ~Describe your sample, including *Units of analysis *Sample size *Sampling strategy ~Discuss reliability and validity *What are you doing to address threats to both? -This assignment should be between 3 and 4 pages *USE subheadings for organization
137
Methods Proposal Recommendations
-Separate paper by subheadings ~Research question and hypothesis ~Study design *Interviews, observations, surveys, etc. -Will vary based on the project but may include ~Sample *size and strategy *Gaining access ~Independent variables ~Dependent Variables *Questions *Measures ~Selected data sets ~Site locations/access
138
Final Paper Guidelines
-Paper Includes ~Problem of Interest ~At least 8 peer-reviewed sources *What researchers have already found out ~Propose study design *Sampling strategy *Type of method **In detail *Issues of reliability and validity **Issues on addressing threats and can't get around due to the study design -Combine Previous work ~Incorporate feedback ~Refine paper *Clear thread in the first paragraph *Analysing other research on the research question *Study proposal your research relates to other research -Should be 6-8 pages ~APA formatting
139