Character Of Criminal Law Flashcards

1
Q

Theories of Punishment

What are the two overarching theories of punishment?

A
  1. Retributivism
  2. Consequentialism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Theories of Punishment

What are the 2 theories of Consequentialism?

A
  1. Deterrence
  2. Rehabilitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Theories of Punishment

Define the theory of Retributivism

A

Criminal punishment is justified b/c the person who is punished deserves to be punished for wrongdoing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Theories of Punishment

Define theory of Deterrence

A

Punishment justified by virtue of ability to deter people from committing criminal offenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Theories of Punishment

Define Deterrence economic theory

A

Crime is socially destructive and socially destructive behavior is best reduced by raising the price those who engage in such behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Theories of Punishment

Define General Deterrence theory

A

Punishment is justified by virtue of ability to deter other people (people in the community, generally) from committing criminal offenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Theories of Punishment

Define Specific Deterrence theory

A

Criminal punishment of a particular D is justified by virtue of ability to deter that particular defendant from re-offending.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Theories of Punishment

Define the Deterrence theory of Rehabilitation

A

Punishment to treat not punish offenders, so they are less likely to reoffend after they are released

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Principles of Statutory Interpretation

What are the basic steps to interpret criminal statute?

A

Apply rules developed by judges
1. Look to ordinary meaning
2. Unclear? Look to legislative history
3. Examine broad statutory framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Key Takeaway from Regina v. Dudley

A
  • Court focused on the letter of law and convicted
    • No greater necessity to kill Parker than anyone else
  • Queen granted mercy - discretion pervades in criminal law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Key Takeaway from People v. Kellogg

A

Conduct, not status, may be criminalized
* Culpability low + sanctions imposed low = no 8th amendment violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two broad classifications of crimes?

A
  1. Mala in se
  2. Mala prohibita
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Mala in se

A

Know that it is bad and it lines up with societal rules about what is bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define Mala Prohibita

A

As a society we choose to prohibit this behavior, because we say it is bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the standard to prove that someone is guilty of a criminal offense

A

“Beyond a reasonable doubt” (it remains undefined by the Supreme Court as to what is enough)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is it disproportionate to apply the death penalty?

A
  1. Rape
  2. D did not kill or exhibit extreme recklessness in felony murder
  3. D is intellectually disabled
  4. D is a minor
17
Q

How does the court apply proportionality in non-capital cases?

A

Only extreme sentences that are grossly disproportionate to the crime are forbidden

18
Q

What is the “void for vagueness” doctrine?

A
  1. Crimes must be precisely defined so people know how to avoid criminal punishment
  2. Crimes should be defined to prevent arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement
19
Q

What outcome if a law is found to be “void for vagueness?”

A

D is excused from criminal liability if the crime is so vague that people of common intelligence must guess at its meaning

20
Q

Void for Vagueness

Under what circumstances is a law invalidated?

A
  1. Crime fails to provide notice that enables ordinary people to understand what conduct is prohibited
  2. Crime authorizes and encourages abitrary and discriminatory enforcement
21
Q

Void for Vagueness

Takeaway from Nash

A
  1. Nash could not be surprised that rigging the market would be deemed a “conspiracy in restraint of trade”
  2. Punishment does not depend on if you do not intend or foresee the consequences
22
Q

Void for Vagueness

Takeaway from Gray v. Kohl

A

Statute is unconstitutionally vague if it
1. Fails to provide notice as to what conduct is prohibited
2. Authorizes or encourages arbitrary and disriminate enforcement