Charles I and how he infringed upon civil liberties in 1626 - 28. Flashcards

(5 cards)

1
Q

Forced Loans:

A
  • Charles needed funds and couldn’t raise money with the consent of parliament -> he had to do so without their agreement.
  • JP’s refused Charles unless parliament granted a subsidy.
  • City of London offered only £20,000.
  • Had to get a forced loan instead -> needed funds for ships as war with France was likely.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Billeting:

A
  • Extra parliamentary taxation needed.
  • Aroused opposition, but collected £240,000.
  • Some of this left in the hands of the counties to pay for raising troops.
  • The forces were billeted on local communities at little charge to the crown.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Clergy preaching on Divine Right:

A
  • Some clergy gave this taxation their support and preached sermons arguing that it was a Christian duty to obey the King.
  • Charles liked the sermon given by Robert Sibthorp, that he asked Abbot to license it for publication.
  • When the Archbishop refused he was confined to his house and his role in the church courts handed to commission.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dismissal of Lord Chief Justice :

A
  • The Lord Chief Justice, Sir Randolph Crew, refused to sanction the forced loan as a legal measure and was so dismissed by Charles.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The 5 Knights case & Habeus Corpus:

A
  • There were some who refused to pay and risked prison or even forced service in the navy.
  • Sir John Eliot, John Hampden and Sir Thomas Wentworth were among them.
  • 5 of the 76 who were imprisoned for refusing the loan, claimed a writ of Habeas Corpus.
  • Under this ancient right they could not be held in prison indefinitely without being brought to trial.
  • Judges who heard the case found it a difficult decision as precedents unclear
    -> eventually decided Charles did have the right to imprison his subjects for an indefinite period “for reasons of state”, as part of his prerogative.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly